Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell Says C.I.A. Was Misled About Weapons
The New York Times ^ | 5/17/04 | DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 05/17/2004 5:33:58 AM PDT by JohnGalt

WASHINGTON, May 16 — Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said for the first time on Sunday that he now believes that the Central Intelligence Agency was deliberately misled about evidence that Saddam Hussein was developing unconventional weapons.

He also said, in his comments on the NBC News program "Meet the Press," that he regrets citing evidence that Iraq had mobile biological laboratories in his presentation to the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003.

The assertion about the mobile labs was one of the most dramatic pieces of the presentation, which was intended to make public the Bush administration's best case for invading Iraq. For days before his speech, Mr. Powell sat in a conference room at the C.I.A., examining the sources for each charge he planned to make.

But on Sunday, Mr. Powell argued that the C.I.A. itself was misled, and that in turn he was, too. "Unfortunately, that multiple sourcing over time has turned out not to be accurate," Mr. Powell said, going farther than he did on April 2 when he conceded that the intelligence was not "that solid."

On Sunday, Mr. Powell hinted at widespread reports of fabrications by an engineer who provided much of the most critical information about the labs. Intelligence officials have since found that the engineer was linked to the Iraqi National Congress, an exile group that was pressing President Bush to unseat Mr. Hussein.

"It turned out that the sourcing was inaccurate and wrong and in some cases, deliberately misleading," Mr. Powell said in the interview, broadcast from Jordan. "And for that, I am disappointed and I regret it."

That was a sharp contrast to comments four months ago by Vice President Dick Cheney, who said the administration still believed that the trailers were part of a program of unconventional weapons, and added that he "would deem that conclusive evidence" that Mr. Hussein in fact had such programs.

Taken with past admissions of error by the administration or its intelligence agencies, Mr. Powell's statement on Sunday leaves little room for the administration to argue that Mr. Hussein's stockpiles of unconventional weapons posed any real and imminent threat.

"Basically, Powell now believes that the Iraqis had chemical weapons, and that was it," said an official close to him. "And he is out there publicly saying this now because he doesn't want a legacy as the man who made up stories to provide the president with cover to go to war."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: feathers; powell; prewarintelligence; tar; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: ThatsAllFolks2

OOooooohhh. Well, that's different, although do we yet know with certainty what those "mobile labs" were for?


61 posted on 05/17/2004 12:26:48 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnGalt

Newsmax's first page has a streamer with this..

"...Powell said that he had cited intelligence that had been “deliberately” falsified in an effort to win public approval for the war."

Wonder what that's all about.


64 posted on 05/17/2004 11:49:59 PM PDT by The Raven (<<----Click Screen name to see why I vote the way I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
The wolves in this case would be to deliver the felon Chalabi to a Jordanian prison where he has been convicted of embezzlement.

That would be a nice ending, with the added bonus of tossing a bone to the Jordanians who have generally been a help to our nation.

Then we can settle up with the domestic guys who knew exactly what they were doing, and what they were getting, when they hired him.

Wolfie and Dougie being marched out of the Pentagon toting one carboard box of posessions each will probably be as close to a perp walk as we'll get....and I doubt we'll even get that.
65 posted on 05/18/2004 4:29:17 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Atlantic Friend
Will we discover Iraqi WMDs in Syria, I really wonder.

The exact same group (along with the exact same media gang, and the one predictable "ally") who sold us the same shinola vis a vis Iraq, are now feverishly attempting to try the same towards Syria.

Someone should buy one of those little desk signs for the President that has the ole "Fool me once, shame on you...." slogan on it.
66 posted on 05/18/2004 4:37:06 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink

I concur with the nefarious role of such dubious sources - but I'd like to get to the bottom of the sarin shell story.

Was it a leftover from the Iraqi army ? A shell taken out of a hidden stockpile ? Was the building a hidden factory for such devices ? And if genuine, as it seems to be, who is behind the explosion ? I really hope we get answers to these few questions real quick.


67 posted on 05/18/2004 5:37:56 AM PDT by Atlantic Friend (Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Atlantic Friend
Good questions and I share your couriousity re them.

Iraq did not invent sarin, and certainly is not the only nation to posess it.

There so many different folks from different nations running amuck there, with each pursuing their own interests and agendas, that getting the "answers" may be difficult.
68 posted on 05/18/2004 5:46:17 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink

Indeed. I was, and right now still am, skeptical about the WMD story. Not that I doubt Iraq had some before the Gulf War, that is much documented. A few Chem mortar or artillery shells are certainly no big deal. A large stockpile, however disseminated throughout the country, or a factory able to produce thousands, or even hundreds of such shells would be quite a different matter to me.

What baffle me here are the initial reports, that said a small quantity of Sarin had been detected. Is "a small quantity" consistent with the explosion of a 155 mm Sarin shell ? I just hope further reports will make the whole thing crystal clear.


69 posted on 05/18/2004 5:55:19 AM PDT by Atlantic Friend (Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson