Skip to comments.
Powell Says C.I.A. Was Misled About Weapons
The New York Times ^
| 5/17/04
| DAVID E. SANGER
Posted on 05/17/2004 5:33:58 AM PDT by JohnGalt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: ThatsAllFolks2
OOooooohhh. Well, that's different, although do we yet know with certainty what those "mobile labs" were for?
61
posted on
05/17/2004 12:26:48 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
Comment #63 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnGalt
Newsmax's first page has a streamer with this..
"...Powell said that he had cited intelligence that had been deliberately falsified in an effort to win public approval for the war."
Wonder what that's all about.
64
posted on
05/17/2004 11:49:59 PM PDT
by
The Raven
(<<----Click Screen name to see why I vote the way I do.)
To: JohnGalt
The wolves in this case would be to deliver the felon Chalabi to a Jordanian prison where he has been convicted of embezzlement.
That would be a nice ending, with the added bonus of tossing a bone to the Jordanians who have generally been a help to our nation.
Then we can settle up with the domestic guys who knew exactly what they were doing, and what they were getting, when they hired him.
Wolfie and Dougie being marched out of the Pentagon toting one carboard box of posessions each will probably be as close to a perp walk as we'll get....and I doubt we'll even get that.
65
posted on
05/18/2004 4:29:17 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: Atlantic Friend
Will we discover Iraqi WMDs in Syria, I really wonder.
The exact same group (along with the exact same media gang, and the one predictable "ally") who sold us the same shinola vis a vis Iraq, are now feverishly attempting to try the same towards Syria.
Someone should buy one of those little desk signs for the President that has the ole "Fool me once, shame on you...." slogan on it.
66
posted on
05/18/2004 4:37:06 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
I concur with the nefarious role of such dubious sources - but I'd like to get to the bottom of the sarin shell story.
Was it a leftover from the Iraqi army ? A shell taken out of a hidden stockpile ? Was the building a hidden factory for such devices ? And if genuine, as it seems to be, who is behind the explosion ? I really hope we get answers to these few questions real quick.
To: Atlantic Friend
Good questions and I share your couriousity re them.
Iraq did not invent sarin, and certainly is not the only nation to posess it.
There so many different folks from different nations running amuck there, with each pursuing their own interests and agendas, that getting the "answers" may be difficult.
68
posted on
05/18/2004 5:46:17 AM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
Indeed. I was, and right now still am, skeptical about the WMD story. Not that I doubt Iraq had some before the Gulf War, that is much documented. A few Chem mortar or artillery shells are certainly no big deal. A large stockpile, however disseminated throughout the country, or a factory able to produce thousands, or even hundreds of such shells would be quite a different matter to me.
What baffle me here are the initial reports, that said a small quantity of Sarin had been detected. Is "a small quantity" consistent with the explosion of a 155 mm Sarin shell ? I just hope further reports will make the whole thing crystal clear.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson