Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black XXVII: "Dubyuh's Got Faith!!"
MUD's Fertile Cranial Cavity ^ | 21 May 2004 | Mudboy Slim

Posted on 05/21/2004 10:31:48 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim

"Dubyuh's Got Faith!!"
(To be sung to Eric Clapton's "Running On Faith"

One...two...three...four...

Lately Right's been running on Faith...
Searchin' fer Justice and Truth.
But our World will be Right...
When Dubyuh sings our tune.

Lately, I've been wond'rin' why I FReep...
Shrinkin' government's that fer which I pray.
Protect the World from Left's slime...
Please Dubyuh, join the fray!!

Right's always been...
Willin' to help thru taxes that we pay.
Seems like by now...
Right'd find a Prez who cares...fer Liberty!!

Then we'd go running on faith
All of Right's dreams shall come true!!
All the world will be Right...
When Dubyuh loathes Big Guv'ment, too!!

(Sweet guitar pickin' by the BigMan)

Right's always been...
One to fight fer that fer which we pray!!
Seems like by now...
We'd find a Prez who cares...fer Liberty!!

Won't believe Pubbies on faith...
All of Right's dreams shall come true!!
Lead the world 'cuz we're Right...
George Dubyuh, you can join US, too!!
Yes, you can...
And Rush shall support you...
Then Sean shall support you...
And MUD shall support you...
All of Right's dreams shall come true...
The Right shall support you...
Truth shall see you thru...

Mudboy Slim


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Kansas; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushwhupskerry; conservativism; devolvepower; federalleviathan; rightwingers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 621 next last
To: SamFromSC
"...he's innocent until proven guilty."

I don't think we can label any KKKer as "innocent"...perhaps he'd be found "Not Guilty of Lynching", but far from innocent, imho!!

Regards, fellow Christian...MUD

521 posted on 06/08/2004 12:45:04 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Back to the topic at hand...why shouldn't we vote for Kerry? Or, more to the point, why should we vote for Bush? Here's an interesting tidbit from MyDD:

Yesterday when I estimated that half of the new jobs created in May were probably part time jobs, I was way off. In reality, 287% of the new jobs created in May were part-time jobs. Check out page ten of the new jobs report (Warning PDF file):

Persons at work part time, in thousands
All Industries    January    February    March    April    May   
Economic Reasons    4,714    4,437    4,733    4,574    4,665   
Non-Economic Reasons 18,905 18,900 19,006 19,000 19,621
Total       23,619    23,337    23,739    23,574    24,286   
Nonagricultural
Economic Reasons    4,613    4,328    4,622    4,471    4,605   
Non-Economic Reasons    18,636    18,691    18,693    18,664    19,220   
Total        23,249    23,019    23,315     23,135    23,825   

"Noneconomic reasons" means that the employees in question only wanted part-time work, and thus are not considered underutilized labor. "Economic reasons" means the opposite.

There are probably two main causes for the May surge in part time employment for non-economic reasons:

-College students starting part-time jobs over the summer
-The babies from the August 2003 blackout would have been born in May 2004, thus causing many people to switch to part-time employment to take care of their newborns.

No matter the causes, there were far more part-time jobs created in May than there were total jobs created in May. 712,000 part time jobs created minus 248,000 total jobs created equals 464,000 fewer people working full-time jobs in May than in April.

Overall, since February 949,000 part time jobs have been created. This number is almost identical to the total number of all jobs created since February, 947,000. According to the Department of Labor, over the past three months, full-time employment in this country has barely changed at all.

You can lie to people about a lot of things, but this is one thing you cannot lie to them about. They know that their economic situation is deterioating, through rising health care, energy, transportation, and housing costs. The only new jobs around are part-time jobs. The real wages of full-time jobs are not increasing, even though hours worked are.


522 posted on 06/08/2004 12:53:12 PM PDT by SamFromSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: SamFromSC
"They were able to tear apart Hillary's universal health care initiative..."

Thank God!! Not one single Senator of either Party supported that monstrosity...if you supported it, I believe it says more about you than about EEEEEEvil Republicans denying you yer God-given right to Universal Health Care.

"...but not the balanced budget act."

That legislation was toothless and not worth the paper on which it was printed. Only a Constitutional Amendment to Mandate Balancing the Budget would have any hope of being successful.

Let's get back to this vacuous concept that Clinton's tax increase led to the improvement of the economy. What economic principle did Clinton's tax hike utilize to improve said economy? I'll answer that...NONE!! There is no commonly-accepted economic theory that supports this delusion that increasing tax rates leads to economic expansion...in fact, just the opposite has been proven true time and again!!

The Bush I Recession was a direct result of Dubyuh's Daddy's asinine decision to compromise with the DemonRATS and believe Dem BigSpenders when they PROMISED to decrease spending if Bush, Sr. raised taxes!! NEVER negotiate with DemonRATS becuz they LIE, CHEAT, and STEAL without any guilty conscience whatsoever!! However, the economic recovery that began while Bush the Elder was still in office was simply a continuation of the excellent economy which transpired since Reagan's tax cuts in the early-80's. If anything, Clinton's Tax Increase simply made that recovery more sluggish than it needed to be!!

Did you ever take any Macroeconomics classes in college? If so, I suspect you already know all this.

MUD

523 posted on 06/08/2004 12:58:40 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: SamFromSC
"They know that their economic situation is deterioating, through rising health care, energy, transportation, and housing costs."

Actually, a lot of the folks I know in the construction industry are having record years. Personally, I'm in the process of selling off a coupla rental properties and buying a coupla more...I'm tickled pink that we've got such a bustling economy here in central Virginia.

You still in NooJoisey?! If so, what do you expect with yer Socialist Governor?!

MUD

524 posted on 06/08/2004 1:35:03 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim

To: jla

"I'd hate for Kerry to get the Ol' Dominion's 13 EC votes because Dubya didn't sway enough Republicans to vote for him."

Me, too...Dubyuh's got his work cut out fer him. I suggest he propose a slew of Conservative Legislation!!

FReegards...MUD


I second that!
525 posted on 06/08/2004 3:00:49 PM PDT by GummyIII (I'm doin' better than I deserve!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SamFromSC
If the tax cuts were so effective, then why did Reagan feel the need to enact two large tax increases (one of them bigger than Clinton's tax increase) soon afterwards to curtail its effects?

One increase was very reluctantly and begrudgingly agreed to by RR.
He was promised, Sam, by your Democrat leaders of that time that for every one dollar increase in taxes, three dollars would be cut from federal outlays. Of course the latter never occurred.
This increase, you forgot to mention, was on corporation's profits.

What you liberals don't, and obviously never will, get is that for all the spinning of the facts and the outright lies you tell, especially regarding RR's two terms you forget that telling the American people that they really aren't better off just doesn't have any credence if they actually are better off.
And from the looks of RR's resounding victory over Fritz Mondale, I'd say that the American people weren't quite ready to buy any of the latest batch of Liberal Elixir.

As for the second tax increase you'll have to shake my memory on what that was.

526 posted on 06/08/2004 4:24:01 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
From another thread:

Reagan was the Great Liberator...MUD

527 posted on 06/08/2004 4:29:37 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: SamFromSC
Posted to Mia T:

why do you endorse killing Americans who disagree with you?

Now Sam, Mia never implied any such thing. Why do you deliberately choose to distort her words and the intent of those words?

528 posted on 06/08/2004 4:42:18 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; Mudboy Slim
"You got MORE surgery, my FRiend?!"

Yep, and the third one 6 weeks later!

There must be one or two really pretty nurses at that hospital for The Sultan to be visiting this much. (I just hope they're Republicans)

529 posted on 06/08/2004 4:44:51 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: sultan88

Thanks for posting it. I have so little time to post everywhere I want to. I hate work.


530 posted on 06/08/2004 4:49:38 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Everything that really matters I learned from a song when I was 3. Jesus Loves Me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim

Glad you like it. Along with my Fraternal grandfather Ronald Reagan was among the most powerful human influences in my life.


531 posted on 06/08/2004 4:51:54 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Everything that really matters I learned from a song when I was 3. Jesus Loves Me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: jla
"Reagan was the Great Liberator!!"

Double-DutchDittoes, Dude...MUD

532 posted on 06/08/2004 6:01:14 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
"Ronald Reagan was among the most powerful human influences in my life."

Me, too, dude...MUD

533 posted on 06/08/2004 6:03:04 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim

God Bless Ronald and Nancy !


534 posted on 06/08/2004 6:47:42 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Everything that really matters I learned from a song when I was 3. Jesus Loves Me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: SamFromSC
"That's long since been put to rest."

Is there any chance you could direct me to the material, investigation, testimony etc. that "put to rest" any suspicion of Sen. Byrd's involvement in domestic terrorism while a member of the KKK?

Inquiring minds want to know.
535 posted on 06/08/2004 8:33:51 PM PDT by Flora McDonald (Stand the Storm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Jeff Head's "My Tribute to Ronald Reagan, the Gipper"

Good stuff, my FRiend...MUD

536 posted on 06/09/2004 5:10:50 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Thanks MUD, have a GREAT time there in DC...wish we were there with you...like old times, eh? (MFL 1999).

Also, we are going to be in Simi Valley on Friday, hoping to see him pass on his way to burial.

BTW, as regards Dubya's faith, check out this DVD...it is excellent. I bought two, one for home and one for others to see. PBS I think intended it as some sort of hit piece...but it has backfired in a major way on them.

The Jesus Factor.

537 posted on 06/09/2004 5:28:45 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Pres Reagan...your memory and impact have not dimmed...only aged and grown stronger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Actually, a lot of the folks I know in the construction industry are having record years. Personally, I'm in the process of selling off a coupla rental properties and buying a coupla more...I'm tickled pink that we've got such a bustling economy here in central Virginia.

Well, consider yourself lucky. You're well off enough to not have to worry about the same problems that people without a place to live, much less properties to buy and sell, have. I can give you lots of example of friends of mine in the IT industry, living all over the country, who are having trouble finding and keeping work these days. Some have lost their houses. Some have had to get jobs in the service-sector, usually two, to keep their heads above water. Health insurance is gone -- they can't afford COBRA -- and is getting more expensive for the ones that do have jobs.

NJ is actually doing better than most states in terms of job and economic growth, but still not great. I dislike Mcgreevey, but he's not the problem. As with so many other things in this administration, the problem starts at the top.

538 posted on 06/09/2004 5:44:47 AM PDT by SamFromSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; pokerboy; Tinman; Buckeroo; Dukie
"(MFL 1999)"

Hard to believe it's been almost five years...time sure flies when yer fightin' the Good Fight!! We needta plan a reunion event, maybe even get PokerFace back--if we can get them to agree to refrain from denigrating our POTUS on stage...LOL!!

FReegards...MUD

539 posted on 06/09/2004 6:06:02 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim (Rest in Peace, Dutch Reagan!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: jla
One increase was very reluctantly and begrudgingly agreed to by RR. He was promised, Sam, by your Democrat leaders of that time that for every one dollar increase in taxes, three dollars would be cut from federal outlays. Of course the latter never occurred. This increase, you forgot to mention, was on corporation's profits.

Actually, the Social Security and Medicare taxes were increased, not corporate profits. Also, in the same essay, it mentions that "The Reagan Administration and the split Congress also raised taxes in 1982, 1984, and 1986, although back then they were called 'revenue enhancements,' not tax increases." So I stand corrected: there were a total of four tax increases under Reagan, not two.

I don't know how begrudging the Republicans were or what was promised and what was delivered, but I do know the economy tanked soon after the 1981 tax cut, and didn't tick back up until the tax cuts was rolled back in the subsequent tax increases. Here's some charts that illustrate it for you:

There's more, as well as a nice comparison of Reagan vs. Clinton at this link.

It's real simple: Tax increases increase federal revenue, and tax decreases decrease federal revenue. Meanwhile, today's Republicans spend money like drunken sailors.

What you liberals don't, and obviously never will, get is that for all the spinning of the facts and the outright lies you tell, especially regarding RR's two terms you forget that telling the American people that they really aren't better off just doesn't have any credence if they actually are better off.

That's a nice segue back to my post about today's "job growth" above. Are people really better off just because our administration tells them they're better off?

And when have I ever lied to you, jla? I'm hurt. =)

540 posted on 06/09/2004 6:21:15 AM PDT by SamFromSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 621 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson