Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandy Berger Not Front Page News in Some Major Newspapers
cnsnews.com ^ | 7/20/04 | susan jones

Posted on 07/20/2004 6:33:22 AM PDT by foolscap

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: NavySEAL F-16

Anyone who has used the National Archives, and I have accessed both classified and unclassified material, knows that what Berger did was a crime. One does not move anything, I repeat ANYTHING, from the archives. Berger is a criminal, and should be charged. If it were me, I'd be toast.


41 posted on 07/20/2004 7:17:46 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: foolscap

When missing coverage becomes news then you know who is managing the news.


42 posted on 07/20/2004 7:17:48 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (STAGMIRE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
"When I was informed by the Archives that there were documents missing, I immediately returned everything I had except for a few documents that I apparently had accidentally discarded," he said.

That's the money line. What did he "discard" and why would he "discard" anything having to do with the investigation?

I fully expect silence on the part of the "mainstream" media. Naturally, the "biased" Fox News will cover it, the partisan ba$tards! LOLOL!

Let's put the "fair and balanced" coverage of ABCNBCCBSCNN to the test.

43 posted on 07/20/2004 7:18:04 AM PDT by SpinyNorman (Al Queda, Al Jazeera, Al Gore, Al Franken: the four horsemen of the Apocalypse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap

Gergen, I'd be more interested as to why the STORY HAD BEEN SUPPRESSED for so long. As to a possible leak, cherche la pantsuit.


44 posted on 07/20/2004 7:19:07 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Berger needs to go to prision.

No question about it.

45 posted on 07/20/2004 7:19:41 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: fight, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: foolscap

Page 20 Chicago Slum Times.


47 posted on 07/20/2004 7:20:33 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LTCJ
As NSA chief, Berger knows that every page of every copy of a classified document is numbered, marked, and the document logged as an individual document in its own right, and knows D*MM*D well is is NOT alright to take them. AND that is a FACT.

Obviously. I was simply reporting the spin, not citing its legitimacy.

48 posted on 07/20/2004 7:21:12 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: fight, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

David Gergen
Fax: 617-496-7301
email: david_gergen@ksg.harvard.edu


49 posted on 07/20/2004 7:22:07 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; ASA Vet

"It's all OK because there were backup copies.

"As NSC advisor, Berger knew that there were backup copies, so that's what made it OK for him to take them."

As a NSC advisor, Berger, also knew that if anyone with a clearance to see what he took, put them in our pants and got caught, we would have gone to jail for a long time. Copies carry the same security clearances/restrictions as the original documents.

Also, Berger was not the NSA chief, they probably wouldn't have let him on the parking lot that they don't have.


50 posted on 07/20/2004 7:23:20 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Teresa Heinz Kerry: 'I have to say that John Edwards is very beautiful'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Lead on AOL News...yay!

51 posted on 07/20/2004 7:23:46 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
I have no doubt that Hamberger was sent by a Clinton to "secure" some incriminating files.

That's a pretty good call. Sandy Berger was a stooge. I never picked him to have that good a handle on covering Bubba's butt. That'a Hillary's forte.

52 posted on 07/20/2004 7:23:58 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: fight, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
Of course they downplayed it, they are already in "full protection to cover Willie's lies" mode!

Willie could have prevented 9-11 by killing Osama. But, through the late 90s, he was taking Iraqi oil voucher money (and, maybe some Saudi money) to back off on pulling the trigger on OBL. Willie could have zapped him several times but didn't.

The dems, over the past 2 months, have been in full lie mode, screaming that there couldn't be a connection between 9-11 and Iraq and that anyone who said there was was an idiot. That was the first major clue. They only lie like that to protect Willie. Any investigation of the connection would lead back to Willie.

But, destruction of the paper trail is Willie's specialty. His sewer dwellers are experts at it. That's what Berger was doing, destroying evidence that Willie could have easily stopped 9-11 and that he was taking Iraqi oil voucher cash (through the same Mark Risch that he later pardoned).

Now, Berger and the faithful from Willie's White House sewer (Begala, Davis, Paneta, etc.) will deny it and belittle any who suggest it. They'll ask why would Berger or any one do such a thing. The answer is easy (the same answer as why Suzie went to prison for no reason), fear of Willie's long and deadly arm and the fact the Berger made millions dealing with the Chinese commies and, maybe, got a piece of the Iraqi oil money.

53 posted on 07/20/2004 7:24:08 AM PDT by Tacis (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jriemer

"One theory of that explains the theft of documents and the liberal foaming at the mouth with the "Bush Lied" crap is that the Clinton Administration flat out compiled years of fake intel data that supported their polyanna perspective on the world. When 911 came along, the average joe could see there was a massive terrorist network in place designed to kill us, did this plan fall apart.

So making a silk purse out of a sow's ear, they turned their lies and intelligence failures into Bush's. BUT, they have to clean up their tracks just in case there are documents that actually say, "Washington, we have a problem w/ terrorism".

Sometimes with liberals, what they accuse us of doing is what they are actually already guilty of committing."


When liberals scream the loudest and point that finger of accusation it is because they are guilty of what they accuse.

Poor poor Hillry what a mess she has to deal with. LOL! The harder she tries to become electable the worse it gets for her.


54 posted on 07/20/2004 7:24:28 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All
As NSA chief, Berger knew that there were backup copies, so that's what made it OK for him to take them.

And to think this moron was NSA chief??? No wonder the terrorists were able to bomb the hell out of us with this guy in charge of security!!! How the hell he ever got a law degree from Harvard is absolutely mind boggling!!! Somebody might want to inform Fat Sandy that there are video cameras in every friggin' room, in every friggin' federal building in the country!!!
HELLOOOOOO
55 posted on 07/20/2004 7:25:44 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: foolscap

The Clinton people are like Hare Krishna. Everything for the cause, no price too great to pay to help the Clintons, going to prison not a problem as long as the boss is protected. His major aides pull stupid stunts like this? Incredible. A frightening chapter in US history, for sure, the senior Bush's worst blunder was running such a horrible campaign that they ever achieved power in the first place.


56 posted on 07/20/2004 7:26:47 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"And to think this moron was NSA chief??? No wonder the terrorists were able to bomb the hell out of us with this guy in charge of security!!! How the hell he ever got a law degree from Harvard is absolutely mind boggling!!! Somebody might want to inform Fat Sandy that there are video cameras in every friggin' room, in every friggin' federal building in the country!!!
HELLOOOOOO"


I imagine this is just a hint of how the Clintons ran the government. Hillry cut her lawyering teeth on Watergate the coup of removing Nixon from office.
57 posted on 07/20/2004 7:28:39 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
"I FORGOT ... armed robbery was illegal."

You took the words right out of my mouth.

58 posted on 07/20/2004 7:28:49 AM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
"When I was informed by the Archives that there were documents missing, I immediately returned everything I had except for a few documents that I apparently had accidentally discarded," he said.

This is what caught my eye...you would have to be blind, stupid, and a democrat not to see through this.

Though nothing will ever happen....it never does.

59 posted on 07/20/2004 7:28:56 AM PDT by Blue Scourge (Off I go into the Wild Blue Yonder...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foolscap
The New York Times played the story at the bottom of Page 16.

Only people who are willing to be played by partisan liberal Democrats read the NYTimes. You sure won't get the news there.

60 posted on 07/20/2004 7:29:49 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson