1 posted on
07/22/2004 10:25:29 PM PDT by
uglybiker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: blam
2 posted on
07/22/2004 10:26:24 PM PDT by
uglybiker
(No. Those are NOT classified documents inadvertently shoved down my pants)
To: uglybiker
Bummer, I already hate flying and now giant waves! I guess I'll have to walk everywhere.
3 posted on
07/22/2004 10:30:40 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
To: All
4 posted on
07/22/2004 10:31:30 PM PDT by
uglybiker
(No. Those are NOT classified documents inadvertently shoved down my pants)
To: uglybiker
"The same phenomenon could have sunk many less lucky vessels: two large ships sink every week on average,I had no idea.
5 posted on
07/22/2004 10:33:06 PM PDT by
GVnana
(Tagline? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
To: uglybiker
6 posted on
07/22/2004 10:33:19 PM PDT by
bd476
To: uglybiker
We need to stop Michael Mooron from doing any more belly flops into the ocean.
To: uglybiker
Rogue waves and tsunamis don't appear to be related but maybe they should be. Currents and eddies seem to be partial cause of rogue waves and earthquakes cause tsunamis.
Wonder what would happen if a major earthquake coincided with adverse weather, currents and eddies.
9 posted on
07/22/2004 10:40:50 PM PDT by
bd476
To: uglybiker
10 posted on
07/22/2004 10:49:22 PM PDT by
kb2614
( You have everything to fear, including fear itself. - The new DNC slogan)
To: uglybiker
14 posted on
07/22/2004 11:06:50 PM PDT by
Porterville
(Your sensitivity offends me you disgusting liberal.)
To: uglybiker
"Once dismissed as a nautical myth"
"helped convert previously skeptical scientists"
I think these were the same guys working on the global warming thing. What an arrogant bunch. Why believe experienced ships officers trained in ocean meteorology who are out there observing when you can form your own theory without observing.
"Rare photo" The photo may be rare but I've seen my share of waves that looked exactly like that. White water on deck is ok but the green water got scary (solid water). Salmon across the deck.
To: uglybiker
I just saw this on Drudge and had to save it to my "archives".
17 posted on
07/22/2004 11:25:02 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
To: uglybiker
To: uglybiker
Talk about a Butterfly Effect.
To: uglybiker
24 posted on
07/23/2004 4:23:15 AM PDT by
MassExodus
(<--- Not just a FReeeper handle, but a sign of things to come)
To: uglybiker
25 posted on
07/23/2004 4:28:07 AM PDT by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: uglybiker
26 posted on
07/23/2004 4:36:04 AM PDT by
nuconvert
(Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror and you wouldn't have been notified.)
To: uglybiker
27 posted on
07/23/2004 5:17:02 AM PDT by
uglybiker
(No. Those are NOT classified documents inadvertently shoved down my pants)
To: uglybiker
Having had a lot of years at sea I am familiar with the rogue wave. Now I have a better idea of the cause. We always thought it was from several wave systems coinciding at one point and generating a wave several times higher than the norm - sort of an oceanic moire pattern.
30 posted on
07/23/2004 5:48:01 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: biblewonk
Dubya's toast. TOAST, I tell ya!
35 posted on
07/23/2004 11:57:52 AM PDT by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: uglybiker
Ah, the sea-based Butterfly Effect. ;-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
