Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty [CBS USES FORGERIES TO SMEAR THE PRESIDENT!!!!!]
CBS ^ | 9/10/04 | Staff

Posted on 09/09/2004 7:33:57 AM PDT by TastyManatees

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty

CBS) The military records of the two men running for president have become part of the political arsenal in this campaign – a tool for building up, or blowing up, each candidate’s credibility as America's next commander-in-chief.

While Sen. Kerry has been targeted for what he did in Vietnam, President Bush has been criticized for avoiding Vietnam by landing a spot in the Texas Air National Guard - and then failing to meet some of his obligations.

Did then-Lt. Bush fulfill all of his military obligations? And just how did he land that spot in the National Guard in the first place? Correspondent Dan Rather has new information on the president’s military service – and the first-ever interview with the man who says he pulled strings to get young George W. Bush into the Texas Air National Guard.

...

But 60 Minutes has obtained a number of documents we are told were taken from Col. Killian's personal file. Among them, a never-before-seen memorandum from May 1972, where Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."

Lt. Bush tells his commander "he is working on a campaign in Alabama…. and may not have time to take his physical." Killian adds that he thinks Lt. Bush has gone over his head, and is "talking to someone upstairs."

Col. Killian died in 1984. 60 Minutes consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 60minutes; bush; camejo; cbs; ccrm; cheney; dubya; edwards; election; forgery; fraud; gwb; kerry; killian; nader; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pilot; seebsnews; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 941-945 next last
To: TastyManatees

Memo #4 is dated 18 Aug 1973. That is a Saturday. Not saying it isn't possible that he was working on a Saturday, but he mentions several things in the memo as "today". Such as "Harris gave me a message today from GRP" and "Austin is not happy today either".


381 posted on 09/09/2004 10:36:06 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
I wish to expand on my previous comment, as I may have been a bit too opaque.

There are many people with many motivations floating around, some of them within the Kerry campaign.

There are as many agendas, even within the Democratic party, as there are campaign workers.

Think about the fact that there have been recent hiring by Kerry of many Clintonites.

382 posted on 09/09/2004 10:38:09 AM PDT by B Knotts ("John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource our national security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
A response to a earlier thread pointed out the IBM Selectric, which were a prevalent typewriter at the time, were capable of this type print. The individual posting used this type of print in a weekly newsletter they were publishing (at the time) so they claim.

I typed all my high school and college papers on an IBM Selectric acquired after the Navy modernized office equipment at the 32nd St Naval Station in San Diego. That was 1973-1976. The machine was refurbished after many years in government service.

383 posted on 09/09/2004 10:38:17 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

This may have been mentioned and may not be important but in looking at my husband's ANG documents from 1971/1972, I noted the following:

all documents are dated like: 4 May 1972 1 August 1973
Bush'w documents are : 04 May 1972 01 August 1973


384 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:01 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If you look at the Bush docs that Bush released, none of those documents appear to contain any memorandums with the reduced font superscript when typing something like 111th. If you notice the non-superscripted memos from Killian's file, there is always a space between the numbers and the letters, i.e., 111 th. If you use a modern word processor it will automatically turn the th into a reduced font size superscript if it immediately follows the numbers.

If the reduced font was available, why is it that the only documents that have them are the recently released Killian documents and then only half of those contain the superscript and the other half contain the non-supercript but have a space between the letters and the numbers?

385 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:12 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

This is all very interesting but has anyone any details on how these memo's just appeared at the Pentagon. I for one would like to see an explanation of how they showed up after all documents concerning National Guard were delivered months ago. Of course billing records can appear out of the blue in the White House.


386 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:42 AM PDT by gumboyaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
In addition to the "Selectric Composer," the IBM Executive Model typewriters used proportional spacing. These predate the Selectric, do not have "the ball," and have a moving carriage.

I am looking for keyboard layouts for the IBM Executive, but doubt anything will turn up. I do have a few old (Royal) typewriters here, and they have a few "odd" characters on single kets, "Circle-C" "Circle-R" "Superscript TM" "1/2" "1/4" "3/4", from memory.

387 posted on 09/09/2004 10:39:49 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Every line break is the same. Every space is the same, and all of the text is printed perfectly on each line. Granted, "the original" looks to have undergone some 'aging', but there's no way that document originated in 1972. It may have been copied into Word, but it didn't come out of a typewriter. More on that at Powerline.

Howlin......I have Paint Shop Pro 8. And there is a program in PSP that allows you to 'age' the look of paper. It's neat. So, it's not impossible to make a new piece of paper look old (er).

388 posted on 09/09/2004 10:40:35 AM PDT by SheLion (Donate to Swift Boat Vets. "I" did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Might the Kerry discharge be a partially-preprinted form, with the personal indivudual stuff typed in later?

That is certainly possible. The DD214 itself is a pre-printed form, of course. The information in proportional fonts is general information that would have applied to a lot of people being processed out of the same OCS. All of the information specific to the individual is typed in the evenly spaced font.

So it is, indeed, possible that the common proportional font information was typed onto the form once using a more sophisticated machine, and this became the Master Form. Copies of this pre-typed form could then be used for each individual record.

This would make sense. In fact, it would make very little sense to forge the common proportionally typed information later, because it has nothing to do with John Kerry in particular.

An excellent point, Beelzebubba...

389 posted on 09/09/2004 10:42:39 AM PDT by bondjamesbond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA; xzins
All true. I saw the show and figured something was not on the up-and-up because they put this story on Wednesday night.

If CBS had wanted to bring real attention to it and to their methods, the show would have played on Sunday's "60 Minutes."

This way they got the lies into the public ledger, but the trail has been obscured.

The Rats want to make this equitable.

NOTHING equals treason.

390 posted on 09/09/2004 10:43:07 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (Kerry is a GirlyManchurian Candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
Sorry about that. Anyway, here is the article:

Kerry doesn't look much like a hero

Web posted Wednesday, September 8, 2004 | Letter to the Editor John Kerry is a war hero. Many of you believe that, and deny anything said to the contrary as simply political lies. I won't try to change your minds; rather, I'll ask you to consider a few things, each of which is fully documented:

# The almost 300 Navy veterans who have spoken out against Kerry also are highly decorated, some even having been prisoners of war.

# Kerry's own writings contradict several of the stories of his heroism, including the rescue stories of former Army Green beret Jim Rassman, and Kerry's Purple Hearts.

# After Kerry returned from Vietnam, he helped form Vietnam Veterans Against the War, which was funded and later supported by communist organizations bent on the defeat of the United States.

# Many of the charges Kerry made against our soldiers in Senate hearings have since been debunked - yet he has never retracted them even after learning that those statements were used by North Vietnamese prison officials to demoralize and torture our prisoners of war.

# VVAW leaders traveled to Hanoi and Paris to negotiate with the leaders of North Vietnam, without authorization from our government, and at home held meetings to consider assassinating public officials and promoting mutiny among our military.

# While Mr. Kerry was involved in acts considered by many to be treasonous and seditious, he was still a lieutenant in the U.S. Naval Reserve, still bound by his oath of office, an oath which read in part: "I swear ... to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic."

Does Kerry still look like a hero to you?

Mike Miller Aiken, S.C. (Editor's note: The writer is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel.) --From the Thursday, September 9, 2004 printed edition of the Augusta Chronicle

391 posted on 09/09/2004 10:44:42 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

I have read practically every single story about these "documents" and I have not yet read that the White House gives them any credibility; I was under the impression that they were discussing the documents "found" at the Pentagon concerning his flight records.

That being said, I agree with you 100 percent about "things going on." Not only are there "recent arrivals" at the Kerry campaign whose allegiance may, in fact, be to the Clintons, a government-in-waiting, if you will, but there are still people at the Pentagon, political appointees who Bill Clinton gave permanent jobs on his way out the door, who have access to most of what we are seeing and/or hearing.


392 posted on 09/09/2004 10:45:32 AM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
Well I'll be damned! As a veteran of the IBM days, I can tell you you're definitely looking at the difference between non-justified (typewriter style) and justified type.

It's a redo. Not authentic.

Today's journalism is soooo bad I'm almost sorry to admit I have a degree in it!

393 posted on 09/09/2004 10:45:52 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

Question from the audience:

Regarding Layman's Silver Star letter (which he does not remember writing), note the "justified left and right sides" of the letter. This letter too did not have mono-spaced type. There is no date on the letter...

http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/militaryrecords_1.pdf

Problem???

DD


394 posted on 09/09/2004 10:46:34 AM PDT by DiamondDon1 (Card carrying Member VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Your point is taken, but the bulk of that work was spent in creating justified output, that is, the text formed a nice smooth margin on the left and right. I never used that typewriter, but I would imagine that if one was not concerned with right-justifying the margin, you could merely type away.
395 posted on 09/09/2004 10:46:50 AM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
CBSLIES
396 posted on 09/09/2004 10:47:07 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

That is great to know.

I have all those programs, but, alas, I am technologically challenged, among many other areas where I am "low" on knowledge.

In fact, I have yet to figure out just what my "function" on the computer/internet is.......LOL.


397 posted on 09/09/2004 10:47:42 AM PDT by Howlin (I'm mad as Zell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

The military changes it. Back in the mid-late 90s I remember having to use 01JAN98 format. Then at the turn of the century they made me use 01JAN2001 instead. Depends on what the regs say during the time. Check his other stuff. Date format is a persistant thing. I know I kept doing it for years after I left ROTC.


398 posted on 09/09/2004 10:48:10 AM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
but there are still people at the Pentagon, political appointees who Bill Clinton gave permanent jobs on his way out the door, who have access to most of what we are seeing and/or hearing.

Very good point. I thought it was odd how these documents suddenly "turned up" at the Pentagon. Now, I think we know how that came about.

I will make a further claim, based on some chance observations. The forger used OpenOffice, in a feeble attempt to throw people off.

399 posted on 09/09/2004 10:48:26 AM PDT by B Knotts ("John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource our national security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
...You would if your intention was not to get caught...

Or if you knew the Medieval Media was going to carry your charges with impunity and allow you the cover of an anonymous source.

In the end it is all a question of moral relativism for the Left. To the mind of the Leftist and their party, portraying Bush as a Liar, exonerates Clinton's lies. Portraying Bush as AWOL exonerates all of Kerry's military recklessness, including his anti-war activities and his voting record.

For proof of this look no further than the way former Presidents were "proved" to have had extramarital affairs while in office a la Clinton during the Monica-made-him-do-it scandal.
400 posted on 09/09/2004 10:49:45 AM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 941-945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson