Posted on 10/08/2004 5:15:45 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
Wasn't Indymedia the one who posted the names, addresses and phone numbers of all the delegates to the RNC with specific threats and ideas of mayhem?
Cryptome never gives a rats ass about anybody's lives or career, except maybe Clintons.
They need to shut down that whole communist cespool. This will just give them more fuel for their eternal fire though, and probably increase their popularity.
BTTT
Fascinating news. Indymedia has some very, very, VERY fascinating contacts. Worldwide. I'd never support seeing websites like these shut-down; but I do like knowing they are having to be RESPONSIBLE for some of the stuff they've been getting away with for many years; being held accountable. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Doesn't Rackspace host several Jihadi sites? It may be a coincidence that Indymedia data was seized along with the Jihadi material.
Yes, they were.
Isn't GEORGE SOROS tied to this?
yep
as a proud resident of Indianapolis and race fan I'm p*ssed that they have associated our fine nickname with this leftist trash
perhaps coincidental but could be related too:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1237820/posts
Terror Charges for British Computer Whiz
StarNewsOnline.com ^ | October 06. 2004 5:41PM | By MATT APUZZO
Indymedia CEO = George Soros
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the global organisation representing over 500,000 journalists worldwide, today called for an investigation into the action by police in Britain in co-operation with other agencies that led to the temporary closure of 21 of the more than 140 Indymedia web sites worldwide.I post this since there's some background on the raid and a little more info in the release.
"We have witnessed an intolerable and intrusive international police operation against a network specialising in independent journalism," said Aidan White IFJ General Secretary. "The way this has been done smacks more of intimidation of legitimate journalistic inquiry than crime-busting."
The IFJ believes that the authorities may have abused their powers in carrying out the action, which is said to have been carried out at the request of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States.
Yesterday police seized two web server computers in London used by the Indymedia network. The servers were located on the premises of the Rackspace company, which is now not giving out any information.
Initial reports suggested FBI officers themselves had seized the servers. The seizure follows visits by the FBI to Indymedia personnel in the US inquiring about the publication on the French site Indymedia Nantes of photographs of Swiss undercover police photographing protestors. The photographs remain available on other websites.
Indymedia sites, which provide challenging and independent reporting, particularly of political and social justice issues, are open forums where any member of the public can publish their comments.
The IFJ believes the seizure may be linked to a September 30 court case in San Jose California, in which Indymedia San Francisco and two students at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania successfully opposed an application by Diebold Election Systems Inc to remove documents claiming to reveal flaws in the design of electronic voting machines which are due to be used widely in the forthcoming US Presidential election.
Although Indymedia UK was back in operation within hours, several of the other 20 sites affected remain silenced today.
"The seizing of computers and the high profile nature of this incident suggests that someone wanted to stifle these independent voices in journalism," said Aidan White. "We need a full investigation into why this action took place, who took part and who authorised it.
I can see where this is heading- another "stole the election" scare by the wacko left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.