Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter writes about Arlen Specter: "Donkey trapped in an Elephants body"
ANN COULTER WEBSITE ^ | April 21, 2004 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 11/06/2004 5:44:17 PM PST by vannrox

Edited on 10/21/2005 2:04:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Donkey Trapped In Elephant's Body

April 21, 2004

Except for the presidential election, the most important election this year will take place on April 27 in Pennsylvania. No, it's not the "American Idol" finals. It's even more important than that. That's the day of the Republican primary pitting a great Republican, Pat Toomey, against the 74-year-old, Ira Einhorn-defending alleged "Republican," Arlen Specter.

Thanks to Arlen Specter:

States can't prohibit partial-birth abortion;

Voluntary prayer is banned at high-school football games;

Flag-burning is a constitutional right;

The government is allowed to engage in race discrimination in college admissions;

The nation has been forced into a public debate about gay marriage;

We have to worry about whether the Supreme Court will allow "under God" to be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.

More than any other person in America, Arlen Specter is responsible for a runaway Supreme Court that has turned every political issue into a "constitutional" matter, giving radical liberals an uninterrupted string of victories in the culture wars. That's not a court, it's a junta.

In a democratic process, liberals could never persuade Americans to vote for their insane ideas ? abortion on demand, gay marriage and adoption, handgun confiscation, cross-district busing, abolishing the death penalty and affirmative action quotas. So issues are simply taken out of the voters' hands by the Supreme Court. Vitally important cultural issues are now decided for us by a handful of unelected elites, who, coincidentally, share the ideology of Janeane Garofalo. It's a lot easier to get a majority out of nine votes than it is to get a majority of 280 million votes.

As long as liberals have a majority of Supreme Court justices in their pockets, they never have to persuade their fellow countrymen to support any of their crackpot ideas. They just sit around waiting for the Supreme Court to give them the "nine thumbs up!" sign to abortion on demand.

When Reagan was president, he threatened to appoint justices who would not discover nonexistent "penumbras," which mysteriously read like a People for the American Way press release, and to return these issues to voters. The uneducated bumpkin Reagan's radical notion was that judges don't write laws, they interpret them.

Liberals exploded in righteous anger ? an emotion they've never mustered toward Islamic terrorists, I note. Still, all their theatrics would have been for naught and we would already have our democracy back ? but for Arlen Specter.

Specter voted against a slew of conservative Reagan appointees, including Jeff Sessions to a federal appellate court (Sessions now sits with Specter on what must be a rather chilly Senate Judiciary Committee) and Brad Reynolds to be associate attorney general. But his epochal vote was against Reagan's nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court.

Liberals waged a vicious campaign of vilification against Bork, saying he would bring back segregated lunch counters, government censorship and "rogue police" engaging in midnight raids. No one expects more of Teddy Kennedy. But when a senator with an "R" after his name opposed Bork, it was over.

Specter pretended to weigh the attacks on Bork thoughtfully and after careful consideration announced he would vote against Bork. By exploiting the fact that he calls himself a "Republican" ? despite voting with John Kerry more often than he voted with Ronald Reagan ? Specter gave cover to the left's portrayal of decent, God-fearing Americans who love their country as being about one step away from David Duke. As the first Republican to oppose Bork publicly, Specter ensured that other craven "moderates" would soon follow suit.

The Bork fiasco utterly cauterized the Republicans. After that, Republican administrations were terrified of nominating anyone provably to the right of Susan Sarandon. Instead of legal giants like Judge Robert Bork, we ended up with Anthony Kennedy and David Hackett Souter on the Supreme Court.

Since Bork, Republican presidents have put three justices on the court. Two of the three gaze upon a document that says absolutely nothing about abortion or sodomy and discern a "constitutional" right to both. (But try as they might, they still haven't been able to discern a woman's constitutional right to defend herself from rapists by carrying a pistol in her purse.) Because of the court's miraculous discovery of a right to sodomy last term, gay marriage is now on the agenda in America.

The nation waits with bated breath to see if, this term, the court will strike "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance. Liberals are so desperate for this to happen that some of them are actually praying for it. The only reason to hope the court might let us keep saying "under God" is that it's an election year. Like Arlen Specter, the Supreme Court often gets religion whenever normal Americans are about to vote.

Luckily for the country, Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court a year before Specter was up for re-election. After supporting Thomas, Specter turned around and started bellyaching that Thomas was a "disappointment" ? presumably for Thomas' failure to ferret out any more "new" constitutional rights such as gay marriage or taxpayer-subsidized penis augmentation. Don't hope for any more election-year conversions if Specter is re-elected: The old coot will be 80 years old by the end of the term.

Some Republicans seem to imagine that Specter has a better chance of winning the general election by appealing to Democrats ? and thereby helping Bush ? than Pat Toomey does. This is absurd. Just because Republicans hate Specter doesn't mean Democrats like him. It's no wonder Pennsylvania often votes Democratic. If Arlen Specter represented the Republican Party, I'd be a Democrat, too.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2003; 2004; american; ann; appointment; arlen; bork; bush; chair; clinton; coulter; democrat; dnc; freedom; gain; hate; iraq; judge; kerry; law; liberty; loss; love; mandidate; missing; opposition; pennsylvania; recommendation; republican; rule; spector; step; terror; value; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: vannrox
Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Clymer (and Toomey).
61 posted on 11/06/2004 10:50:48 PM PST by FlyingHellfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhotoFixer3
Anal Sphincter needs to swith parties I think.

Yes! Swith! Swith, I say! ;-)

62 posted on 11/06/2004 10:52:39 PM PST by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Who votes to place a candidate as head of the Judicial committee? Other members or the entire Senate body

There are two votes.

One is open and one is secret ballot.

The first is on the commitee and is open. The second is the confirming one in the Senate and is secret.

The votes on the committee and in the Senate are by Republicans only. The Democrats have no say in who we pick.

63 posted on 11/06/2004 11:00:51 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie

Please listen to this fact filled audio clip about specter the terrible:

Judicial Nominees Could Hit a New Roadblock in Committee
http://www.cwfa.org/play.asp?id=cw20041105c

The vote Wensday November 17.

mississippi red-neck said:
http://www.cwfa.org/main.asp
I'm posting this on all the links about Specter it explains the power of a chairman and the ruthless man himself.

For heavens sake go to Concerned Women of America and listen to this clip about Specter and an explanation of the power that a chairman has over these nominations. If this man gets chairmanship for the next six years we will not get any decent judges.It's now or never. When you get there click on the new link about Judical roadblocks . Give it time to play. It's stunning.


64 posted on 11/06/2004 11:08:47 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

For some reason it will not load on my real player, any suggestions?


65 posted on 11/06/2004 11:23:10 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
I have both . I think mind loaded on micro soft media and I got audio only. Have you tried going to the web sight first the clicking on the link?
66 posted on 11/06/2004 11:42:27 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Just went there and my windows media player came up after I clicked on the link in the text.

I had to cick on play before it would start loading. Loading was not automatic.

67 posted on 11/06/2004 11:51:38 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Ann is wrong: Unlike Arlen, Donkeys are endowed.


68 posted on 11/06/2004 11:52:46 PM PST by Clemenza (Karl Rove IS Keyser Soze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

cick = click . Getting late.


69 posted on 11/06/2004 11:52:59 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

Yes, I tried that also, I'll keep trying.


70 posted on 11/07/2004 12:04:50 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Got to go to bed now the boss says it's past my bedtime and her feet are cold.

Check with you tomorrow. Goodnight. MRN

71 posted on 11/07/2004 12:17:46 AM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck
Arlen Sphincter


72 posted on 11/07/2004 12:35:23 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
"Rove says Specter promised Bush expedited handling of judicial nominations"

For me...that is the signal from the White House to let him be.
I can only deduce that they've made some quid pro quo deals concerning Specter's election and W's nominees.

I'll now hold my fire. Once we merge with the enemy on the nominees I'll watch for Specter's activity. If at that point he gets in the way, the White House will turn on him and I'll get back to going after him.

For now it is clear, the White House will obliquely support him...therefore I cease fire.

73 posted on 11/07/2004 9:16:59 AM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Ann Coulter says it all and exactly. Any questions?

NO! :))

74 posted on 11/07/2004 9:31:03 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Here is something else to consider. In the 1992 Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court had an opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade. Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justices Byron White, Anthony Scalia, and Clarence Thomas voted to do so.

Those who voted to uphold Roe v. Wade included Associate Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter, and Harry Blackmun. It was Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy who would cast the deciding vote in the case. Kennedy was initially going to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade but ultimately caved in to pressure from pro-abortion groups and voted to uphold it.

Kennedy should never have been a judge in the case. He was appointed to the Supreme Court only after the man nominated before him, Judge Douglas Ginsburg, was voted down by the Senate after admitting he had smoked marijuana in the past. And Ginsburg was only nominated because the man nominated before him was none other than Robert Bork, whose fate we already know. If not for Arlen Specter, it would have been Bork, not Kennedy, casting that deciding vote.

Thanks to Arlen Specter, one golden opportunity to overturn the atrocity that is Roe v. Wade has already been squandered. Can we really afford to put him in a position to do it again?

Remember: those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

With 45 million babies dead and counting, perhaps it is time we informed Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of the folly of giving Specter the power to replace Tom Daschle as obstructionist-in-chief.

75 posted on 11/07/2004 1:12:39 PM PST by St. Johann Tetzel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
aren't you glad she's on our side . . .
76 posted on 11/07/2004 2:22:39 PM PST by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Johann Tetzel

Isn't the easiest way to keep Specter from the chairmanship by removing from the Judiciary committee entirely?


77 posted on 11/07/2004 2:29:07 PM PST by ez (Let the tolerant tolerate my intolerance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny

She is a bit skinny but quite attractive. What I really like about her is her mind. She is just so sharp. I think she's from French stock. Explains her body build.


78 posted on 11/10/2004 11:55:16 AM PST by seppel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

She's on this week's cover of Time magazine, so I'll bump this up.


79 posted on 04/18/2005 10:37:25 AM PDT by hattend (Thinking up a new tagline...please stand by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoofaBoy; The Invisible Hand
So, you guys gonna do him?

Proof that he's gay, too.

80 posted on 10/21/2005 1:55:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson