[KJacob]

I believe Fox's tracking poll was the only one that had Kerry beating Bush this time. They are even worse then Zogby.

[writer33]

Here we go with polls again. I guess we still haven't learned our lesson about Americans. And this is so meaningless, it's meaningless. :)

[stainlessbanner]

So basically any candidate the left runs in 2008 wins?

More koolaid please!

[AmericanMade1776]

I was not aware that Jeb Bush was going to be running for President in 2008. Besides...a lot can happen in four years, before the next Presidential Election, for instance, John Kerry might have an allergic reaction to Botox...then where would he be????

[soccer_linux_mozilla]

I would NOT vote for Jeb (nepotism) or Pataki (RINO).

Period.

[Voice in your head]

John Kerry (D) 45% - 37% Jeb Bush (R)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 40% - 33% Bill Frist (R)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 41% - 35% George Pataki (R)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 46% - 35% Jeb Bush (R)

A big thanks to FOX News for figuring this out. Now the Republican Party can save all of its fundraising money for 2008 and use it to focus on the 2010 congressional elections.

[evets]

... but would Kerry win in a debate? ( /sarcasm )

[AmericanMade1776]

One more thing, John Kerry would still not be able to carry Jesusland (Michael's Moore's word for those states that voted for Bush) in 2008.

[Phocion]

Jeb's not running anyway.

[Terpfen]

I thought we were done with polls until at least January 20. Guess I was wrong.

And what the heck is this? Jeb has said he's not running in 2008. This is an even more meaningless poll.

[demlosers]

An 8% loss to Kerry. LoL!

[peacebaby]

Swiftvets won't let Kerry win. He's toast. And on-the-records made by Hillary are going to get in her way in 2008.

[verity]

There is an assumption that these folks will not have passed on!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

JFnK (sign the SF-180) wouldn't be running against Jeb.

He'd be running against the Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth.

Again.

[APFel]

What does the general public know about ANY of those Republican "candidates"? John Kerry had a huge national campaign, and while no one knows what his policies are about, they at least know who he is.

Pollster: "Kerry or Frist?"

Pollee: (Thinking: I know who Kerry is, but what is a Frist?) "Kerry"

Well, here's to Kerry giving it another go.

APf

[speed_addiction]

These are the same type of polls that had a "generic" Democrat beating George W. Bush earlier this year.
People are always going to pick the out of power party in these types of polls until actual lines are drawn and it is for real.

[NaughtiusMaximus]

By '08 all these losers are going to be miraculously transformed into BIG winners . . . Yeah, right. By next year I'm going to be 20 lbs. lighter and jogging 5 miles every day. Lots of wishful resolutions at this time of year.

[Conspiracy Guy]

We're doomed, doomed I tell ya!

[demlosers]

OH yeah! Rassmussen says Hillary cannot beat a "generic Republican" for 2008:

-snip-

If the next Presidential Election were held today, 46% of voters would vote for a generic Republican candidate over Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that 39% of voters would cast their ballot for Senator Clinton.

FR: Hillary Trails in Polls

[Andy from Beaverton]

It's called name recognition and it's far too early to do these polls. They first should have asked, 'Do you know Jeb Bush and if so...'.