Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Naco and Agua Prieta had no real reason for existence until Operations Gatekeeper and Hold the Line pushed traffic out of San Diego and El Paso. Now they prosper as staging areas for illegals and drug smugglers.
1 posted on 12/28/2004 8:28:00 PM PST by JackelopeBreeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JackelopeBreeder

What about training real coyotes to do the job of scaring intruders? Just a morbid thought.


2 posted on 12/28/2004 8:29:41 PM PST by Kurt_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HiJinx; gubamyster; Happy2BMe; Spiff; SandRat; idratherbepainting; B4Ranch; Joe Hadenuf; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 12/28/2004 8:31:32 PM PST by JackelopeBreeder (Speak softly and carry a gopher snake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder

Two of the most disgusting cancers on our society are the drug trade and illegal immigration (to include slave trading). The solution is to erect a gigantic wall with a minefield and armed guards across the entire border and to beef up security patrols by the coast guard for the adjacent bodies of water. That will stem the tide of illegals to something less unreasonable. Either firebomb the hell out of the drug-producing areas of nations like Columbia or just legalize them and allow US businesses to use the free market to run the druglords out of business. Or, do neither one, and keep wondering why the problems don't get solved.


4 posted on 12/28/2004 8:34:07 PM PST by Voice in your head ("The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." - Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder

They can use the SeaBee's to build the fence. They can use old beach matting for the fence. That is what they did in San Diego. It helped keep costs down and the Navy is far more productive than union contruction workers.


5 posted on 12/28/2004 8:38:38 PM PST by 82Marine89 (Merry CHRISTmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

ping


6 posted on 12/28/2004 8:38:55 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder; All
Our "secure" border fence:

10 posted on 12/28/2004 8:48:07 PM PST by FBD (Report illegals and their employers at: http://www.reportillegals.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder
Let's spend the bucks to put the fence from San Diego to Brownsville, TX. Double fence with mine field in the middle.

Politcally Incorrect I assume.

12 posted on 12/28/2004 8:48:49 PM PST by ImpBill (Twas a very good election for the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder

Just hink about all of the Drugs and other Crap that would be slowed down.


34 posted on 12/28/2004 9:25:20 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder

Only if it is topped with barbed wire--- and land mines between the two fences.


40 posted on 12/28/2004 9:34:54 PM PST by eccentric (aka baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder
The other day I heard something and came out to see what was happening. I saw a man up on the roof. He told me, 'Don't be scared,' but how can you not be scared, when people are climbing onto your house?" she asked.

Hey lady... buy a gun, practice and then use it as necessary. The criminal aliens will soon get the message to not mess with you or your house.

52 posted on 12/28/2004 10:02:17 PM PST by upchuck (I support the right of leftists to damage their credibility by saying stupid things out loud. MAdams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder

Okay engineers....any idea how much a wall (say like the great wall in China would cost us to build on our North and South borders?


59 posted on 12/28/2004 10:59:59 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JackelopeBreeder; Kurt_D; All

On another thread I said that Lou Dobbs had gotten an emmy for his Broken Border series, I was incorrect, it was the "Exporting America" series that got the Emmy, the Broken Borders series is still in progress.



Here is a portion of last night's transcript from the Lou Dobbs show.
The guest is Michael Cutler is a retired 30-year veteran with the Immigration and National Service.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0412/28/ldt.01.html

Well, my next guest is concerned about a guest worker program that would legalize millions of illegal immigrants working in the country. He says the current proposals are not practical and pose a security risk. Michael Cutler is a retired 30-year veteran with the Immigration and National Service. He spent most of his career as a criminal investigator and intelligence specialist. And thanks very much for being with us, Michael.

MICHAEL CUTLER, CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: Thank you, once again, for having me.

PILGRIM: Why is this proposal not practical? Many think it is practical, get everyone registered, know who's here. It seems very practical.

CUTLER: You won't know who's here because of the crush of humanity showing up at immigration we're going to wind up having to process millions of applications and basically the people at that desk are going to have to take the person's words for who they claim to be. My concern is they are going to wind up giving false names and possibly even circumvent no-fly lists and watch lists at borders so they can enter the United States even though if their real identities were known, they'd be barred from entry and be barred from taking airplane flights.

PILGRIM: So what's your suggestion? We shouldn't register them at all, just let them stay, or register them back in their own countries? What's a more practical solution to this?

CUTLER: In a matter of speaking, we should register them back in their own countries. And this would discourage illegal immigration. If ultimately decide we need guest workers, and I don't know that we do, then we should have them file the applications from back home where we could more properly screen them and discourage people from running the border in the hopes that if they get here, they'll be able to stay.

The other problem we have is right now we're not able to prevent employers from hiring illegal aliens because you've only got 2,000 agents to lend integrity to this process. How do we plan to lend integrity to a guest worker program where these folks are supposed to leave after three years? We don't have the manpower to go out and attempt to make them leave. And we won't even know for certain that they're showing up on the jobs that they claim they're coming to go to work at.

PILGRIM: Michael, we don't have the manpower to actually supervise what's going on now. And you've been in this so long, for so many years. Do you have a solution that you can come up with?

CUTLER: Well, I think, again, that if we do a guest worker program, we need to have these folks apply from their home countries. You know, when the president gave a speech back in January, he talked about a guest worker program, and that translated the next day, according to the border patrol, in a surge of illegal aliens running the border. So the reality is all this does is to encourage more illegal immigration.

And the bureau that's charged with adjudicating these applications have massive problems right now. Mr. Aguirre, who runs the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, that's an arm of the Homeland Security Department, has said that each day, his people have to adjudicate 30,000 applications and issue 20,000 green cards. And right now they have a backlog of over 4 million applications. How do they plan to deal with this tidal wave of applications that are sure to hit the immigration offices around the country?

PILGRIM: Here's what President Bush said recently. We want our border patrol agents chasing crooks and thieves and terrorists not good-hearted people coming here to work. He seems to say, we should focus on people who are trying to come into this country illegally who are terrorists. Do you not think that's a good approach?

CUTLER: I think in principle, it's a great idea. But the problem is, what does a terrorist or bad guy look like? You know, I often like to ask people, what do you think a terrorist does two days before an attack? More than likely he goes to the job he's been holding down for the past five years or attending the school that he's been going to for the past three or four years in an effort to hide in plain sight. We don't know what someone's intentions are when they show up claiming that they're here looking for work.

You know, I wish we had a crystal ball or some kind of a machine that would enable us to see into somebody's heart. And it's all well and good to talk about wanting good-hearted people. But making it reality is something entirely different, then I would challenge anyone that thinks we can do that to show me by what process we can know what somebody intends to do.

PILGRIM: With all your years of experience, we certainly take what you say to heart. Thanks for joining us this evening, Michael Cutler.


68 posted on 12/29/2004 8:27:29 AM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("As frightening as terrorism is, it's the weapon of losers." P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson