Posted on 01/14/2005 6:43:54 PM PST by Salem
They want to get killed, or "martyred", if I may use this palesclinically correct word. That culture of death, that they eagerly embraced, is infectious, lethally.
Can't have the truth told in Bezerkly, can we?
So all Palestinians are terrorists? Even the kids?
This is the excuse that Hamas use to target all Israelis.
Everyone gets conscripted so everyone is a soldier and therefore a target.
Maybe they could organize a "Rachel Corey Memorial Pancake Breakfast" to help raise funds!
Mark
I don't know, but I have a suspicion that stats from the current Islamocraze are as reliable and clear as those of our domestic gun-grabbers. I believe the Israelis target aggressors or those 'bystanders' in the immediate area of same, as a rule, and the PLA does not. For every act of violent retribution by the Israelis, the Palistinians have done a score of attacks. In addition, the PLA attacks seek innocents, not combatants, and their attacks are hugely violent and destructive.
bttt
Not all of them are actively terrorists, all of them are terrorist sympathizers, kids inlcuding.
Even the kids?
Sometimes.
This is the excuse that Hamas use to target all Israelis. Everyone gets conscripted so everyone is a soldier and therefore a target.
"All jewish women are mothers of the future israeli soldiers and therefore are a target. All jewish men are fathers of the future...", etc.. What else can one expect to come out of that palestanian culture of death and destruction? Nothing.
So the Israelis call them all terrorists and they call them all Soldiers of oppression.
Pretty Damn depressing.
Build the wall and get the hell behind it.
That is my opinion.
As I mentioned earlier, not all palestanians are actively terrorists, all of them are terrorist sympathizers.
...and they call them all Soldiers of oppression.
That is what the palestanian culture of death and destruction is about too - inventing countless excuses for not being anything else, like a culture of building lives, for instance.
Build the wall and get the hell behind it.
Walls tend to have something to be thrown over them...
Better to have the wall than not.
Easier to protect than settlements built here and there
Once the wall and disengagement are complete it will be harder for the Palestinians to commit terror acts.
I hold out hope that then a resolution of this situation will commence.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
"650 Palestinian and 120 Israeli children have died since September 2000"
Every last one of the deaths is due to the Arab mass-murderers.
<< Salem
".... is out of context and creates an inaccurate representation of the complex Middle East conflict."
Out of context? Looks to me to be a failure to acknowledge truth, plain and simple, on the part of the commies. >>
Those moral-equivilency-confused, mass-murder-celebrating, evil little bastards don't like the images of dead Human children being introduced into their Goebellsesque "choice" propaganda either.
Truth and Veracity overload their delusionally and psychopathologically imbalanced "minds."
Wow. This is a little odd. Whenever a situation arises in which a work of art is deemed controversial (and calls for censorship arise), I usually find myself siding-- out of a true belief in the power and freedom of artistic expression-- with left-wing supporters of the NEA, etc. But not here.
Here I find myself siding with my fellow conservatives against a group of bitter, Politically-Correct Berkely "liberals" who are taking the (usually far-right) position that their personal offense at or bias towards an exhibit gives them the right to censor the exhibit and ban/punish the artist.
Have these Bezerkely idiots completely lost it? Do they even respect their own (supposed) value systems anymore, or have they begun to sacrifice all values of freedom of speech and expression to the altar of their personal political agendas?
Don't they realize that the battle for free and open artistic expression is being set back by their odious connections with the very type of Muslim extremist who would seek to destroy all art that doesn't glorify their personal religious teachings (Allah this, infidel that)? Here, the lefties are taking sides with the repressive reactionary wingnuts (Muslim terrorists here) to promote a kind of left-wing anti-art crusade. They are saying that If the art in question happens to be sympathetic to Israel or the Jewish viewpoint, that they have the right to impose their own views on others by stepping in and destroying it. What ugly, anti-Semetic, and (in the end) anti-artistic arrogance. What ignorance. To Hell with them.
God Bless Israel, and God Bless America.
What Muslim is not an Islamist?
Hmmmm...a Berkely liberal and a ME terrorist share the same thoughts. No surprises here.
They're called "collaborators" and are beaten to death, dragged through the streets, and strung up before a mural of a smiling Arafat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.