Skip to comments.
Discovery Could Change Dates For Human Arrival On The Great Plains
News Wise ^
| 2-15-2005
| University Of Kansas
Posted on 02/15/2005 12:14:05 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
02/15/2005 12:14:06 PM PST
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
02/15/2005 12:21:05 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
12,000 or 11,000...it was a helluva long time ago...
3
posted on
02/15/2005 12:21:08 PM PST
by
smith288
("Bravery is not a reaction to fear but the act of ignoring it from honor.")
To: blam
I hope that they are doing a better job than the bunch that came up with "Nebraska Man" which turned to be one "pig" tooth!
4
posted on
02/15/2005 12:21:39 PM PST
by
mountainlyons
(alienated vet)
To: blam
If they find a huge yellow beak and yellow feet with blue feathers Jayhawkers will be more insufferable than ever.
5
posted on
02/15/2005 12:25:30 PM PST
by
Lee Heggy
("In Missouri we don't call them "Guerrillas")
To: blam
"Discovery Could Change Dates For Human Arrival On The Great Plains" When I moved here, everyone in my hometown of Seattle assumed I was the first.
B.C.
Fargo, ND
6
posted on
02/15/2005 12:33:40 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
To: smith288
12,000 or 11,000 years ago is impossible. God created the Earth only 6000 years ago. This is more proof that liberal colleges are corrupting society with their blatant falsehoods. This is also proof that C-13 dating doesn't work.
</ creatoid sarcasm >
Seriously, this is a very cool find.
7
posted on
02/15/2005 12:36:30 PM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: Lee Heggy
>the oldest evidence of human occupation in
Kansas >>If they find a huge yellow beak and yellow feet with blue feathers
|
Archeologists are struggling to explain the decorative footware . . .
|
To: mountainlyons
Just out of idle curiosity, sir, what was the "Nebraska man" that turned out a fraud?
9
posted on
02/15/2005 1:05:20 PM PST
by
franksolich
(amour fait beaucoup, mais argent fait tout)
To: blam
Pretty neat. They don't find any Clovis-age material in France until the 480s A.D.
To: franksolich
Nebraska man (
Hesperopithecus haroldcookii) and his wife and family complete with imaginative cave were carefully drawn by a tabloid publication which was then waved around at the Snopes trial to prove common ape-man descent in 1925. In 1927 the fossil evidence (one tooth) was reunited with an extinct pig's skull, from which everyone later admitted the tooth originally came.
Nebraska man's tooth was the blunt instrument with which Darrow killed Bryan.
To: franksolich; Messianic Jews Net
12
posted on
02/15/2005 4:23:39 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
I was wondering, because I never heard of the "Nebraska man" before; do not recall it being mentioned in any books about the Scopes trial that I read.
13
posted on
02/15/2005 4:31:26 PM PST
by
franksolich
(mailed contribution to Free Republic 02-14-05)
To: franksolich
Nebraska man was a whole race of prehuman man so that the Americans could have a claim to early man on this continent. They had pictures painted of the a humanoid that they said was what they thought it would look like. When it turned out the only "bone" they had for the whole race turned out to be a pig's tooth so the whole thing was dropped. There are several other frauds in anthropology but they are hard to find.
To: blam
Thanks for the help, apparently my memory of cave was an interpretation of the rocks in the right margin (see clearer photo). And thanks for the article. The link therein makes clear that whatever hammering Darrow did was off the record and that Osborn's hammering was abruptly withdrawn just before the trial (due to his own doubts). The point stands: Osborn, Smith, and Gregory all tentatively identified the tooth as hominid, Osborn partly because he wanted to show up Bryan, and Smith partly with illustrator Forestier's romanticism. This with other proofs validly demonstrates overready acceptance of a cherished hypothesis.
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
Thanks Blam. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
16
posted on
02/15/2005 9:32:38 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Ted "Kids, I Sunk the Honey" Kennedy is just a drunk who's never held a job (or had to).)
To: blam
*insert "Alabama Man" South Park reference
To: blam
Good Lord! I have a copy of that picture in an old text book!
My California grammar school was discarding (sacrilege: BURNING!) out-dated texts, back in the 50's, and I "rescued" a few that looked interesting. I was in 6th or 7th grade at the time.
The one that had that picture was a late 1800s/early 1900s "natural science" text. It is still packed away, in one of the many boxes of books.
18
posted on
02/15/2005 11:09:15 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: blam
I am sure that they will eventually discover even older sites.
19
posted on
02/16/2005 2:30:18 AM PST
by
Dustbunny
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
To: blam
Discovery Could Change Dates For Human Arrival On The Great Plains
Not unless the discovery includes a time machine. Humans pretty much arrived when they arrived 8-}
20
posted on
02/16/2005 3:08:36 AM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson