Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Other" L-word Has Become A Dirty One ("LIBERAL")
Toronto Star ^ | March 5, 2005 | Antonia Zerbisias

Posted on 03/05/2005 9:41:03 AM PST by srm913

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: WSGilcrest
From what I hear, it SUCKED being a conservative for the 50 years.

I, for one, welcome our new liberal underclass.

21 posted on 03/05/2005 10:09:53 AM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
LOL!!! I can guarantee you that in the last 20 years, 99% of kids graduating from high school weren't even taught what the word, "populism" means. They're gonna' have to go back to the drawing board, because "populism" ain't gonna' cut it.

Actually, that should make it easier for them. If no one really knows what it means they can make it mean whatever they want. Perception is reality, doncha know.

22 posted on 03/05/2005 10:10:29 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
"If "Liberal" is the other L word, what was the first one?"

Leftist, Lunatic, Liar, Loonie, ------ it's all the same...

Semper Fi

23 posted on 03/05/2005 10:19:14 AM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: srm913
Articles like these are hilarious. Poor liberals. Their ideas are so compelling, so popular... if only they didn't always get beaten up by lying conservatives who "push" the "idea" of a liberal slant in the media. I mean, gosh, with such a compelling agenda as the liberal one, if they only found a way to counter those devastating attacks on media outlets they'd run the table.

The author's Canadian, so she gets some slack for cluelessness-- poor girl, she can't help it.

What cracks me up is this poor-me routine liberals pull. I've never heard such nasty invective from a political party than I did from Democrats this last time around-- Bush started a war to benefit his friends from Texas, to profit Haliburton, to scare people into voting for him. That's what was said by elected Democrats, never mind Moore. Now, though, liberals pretend they did nothing but offer high-minded "complexities" and were met with insults from an angry mob of children.

24 posted on 03/05/2005 10:20:45 AM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Leninist...


25 posted on 03/05/2005 10:21:51 AM PST by srm913
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
Liberals have been trying for years to re-name abortion to "choice"..but it hasn't worked very well. Moving from "liberal" to "progressive" will not work either. The glaring fact remains that if time is allowed to pass, the object of their "choice" becomes a human being. The light of truth is too glaring. The truth that liberalism=socalism is likewise too glaring.

A cat is a cat, a horse is a horse, a rat is a rat, and a liberal is a liberal....even if he is called........"progressive".

26 posted on 03/05/2005 10:22:08 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Liberalism is terminal.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
Feel free to add.......

Here's my favorite:

OWNERSHIP

27 posted on 03/05/2005 10:23:42 AM PST by ShowMeMom (I have a mind like a steel whatchmacallit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!


28 posted on 03/05/2005 10:27:23 AM PST by WSGilcrest (Tinky likes it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty
Moving from "liberal" to "progressive" will not work either.

Back in my college days (class of 92), I was a flaming liberal---but I never called myself one.

Instead, I was proudly 'progressive'---a name reinforced in the liberal echo chamber of th times (mother jones, the progressive, the utne reader, pacifica radio, ad nauseum).

The name has been around since the '30's, and it has never caught on in the mainstream

29 posted on 03/05/2005 10:27:30 AM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: srm913
Thanks to the right, its media mouthpieces, and a lack of cohesion on the left, knowledge of liberalism's benefits has slipped down the memory hole.

Just as any of the benefits of conservativism have been swept under the rug by the liberal-dominated press. The great struggle of the past three generations, the victory over Communism by US Conservatives, was swept under the rug by the media (not to mention the back-stabbing collaboration by liberals).

Cry me a river, liberal.

30 posted on 03/05/2005 10:29:00 AM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srm913
So how do liberals win the word game?

Leadership and character are not word games.Thankfully libs are unwilling to admit that they lack both.
I will continue to cheer them on as they march down the road to the darkness of obscurity.

31 posted on 03/05/2005 10:32:34 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fintan

Doctor -- my eyes! My eyes! AHHHHHHHHHHHH!


32 posted on 03/05/2005 10:33:56 AM PST by TrueKnightGalahad (It is only with the heart that one can see rightly. What is essential is invisible to the eye. A S-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest

33 posted on 03/05/2005 10:34:08 AM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth

Didn't she have her own sitcom once called "The Pruitts Of Southampton"? I know that face from somewhere.

 

No, I think she's the star of  "I'm So Full of Myself".


34 posted on 03/05/2005 10:34:47 AM PST by Fintan (A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: srm913
A blond Maureen Dowd with chubby cheeks?
35 posted on 03/05/2005 10:37:34 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Pretty close. She's just as delusional.


36 posted on 03/05/2005 10:44:58 AM PST by srm913
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: srm913
That is classic propaganda, says psychologist Neil Wollman, a senior fellow with the Peace Studies Institute at Indiana's Manchester College.

Never mind that liberals fought for social security, civil rights,...

This woman is filled with her own propaganda. The liberal democrat party rejected civil rights. It was the evil conservative Republicans that passed the civil rights act and abolished slavery. Conservatives understand basic economic principles the show private accounts for SS give a better return than the current pyramid scheme. But when do facts matter to liberals?

37 posted on 03/05/2005 10:50:26 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

"Right now, liberals are snapping up a slim volume by George Lakoff, a cognitive linguist at the University of California at Berkeley."

It doesn't matter and it won't help. The only thing that's a "stranglehold" is America's grasp of reality.

Turning to this loser is proof positive that the 'rats have missed the point completely. They're just looking for one more way to scam the people by twisting words. Jerkwater perfessers won't get it done for them.


38 posted on 03/05/2005 10:51:41 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Perception is reality, doncha know.

Yep. Your right. But most of them are still going to have a hard time spelling it (four syllables!).

39 posted on 03/05/2005 11:03:20 AM PST by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: srm913
during the U.S. presidential campaign, we saw supporters of Vermont governor Howard Dean dismissed as a "tax-hiking, government-expanding, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body-piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freak show."

I would be willing to bet that Mr. Dean doesn't have any body piercings. All the rest of it is true, of course. And, for the record, I don't fear being called a liberal. I despise it. Those are practically fighting words.

40 posted on 03/05/2005 11:14:31 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson