Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon delegation arrives in Taipei for talks with military
Taipei Times ^ | Mar 17, 2005 | Rich Chang

Posted on 03/16/2005 8:34:58 PM PST by Lokibob

 

 

 

Pentagon delegation arrives in Taipei for talks with militaryBy Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTER
Thursday, Mar 17, 2005,Page 1

A US military delegation arrived in Taipei yesterday, and will discuss the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) capabilities with Taiwanese military officials.

A member of the delegation, who requested anonymity, told the Taipei Times that the US saw the possibility of China's launching an attack using asymmetric warfare tactics against Taiwan as increasing.

"The US is concerned as to whether the PLA would be able to start an asymmetric war against Taiwan and whether there exists a fifth column of infiltrators in Taiwan," he said.

He said that the military delegation would also attend a four-day, closed-door unscheduled briefing with the Ministry of National Defense (MND) on the PLA's ability to invade Taiwan.

Meanwhile, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Hsueh Shih-ming (Á§¥Û¥Á) told the legislature on Monday that, according to NSB statistics, law enforcement officials have documented more than 49,000 Chinese illegal immigrants in Taiwan, and had repatriated more than 45,000 of them. Over 4,000 are missing.

Hsueh said that, while the NSB found that some of them are spying for China in Taiwan, the NSB has yet to uncover any organized activity among Chinese immigrants.

Hsueh, however, admitted that the NSB is concerned that China might use infiltrators to engage in asymmetric warfare against Taiwan, employing such tactics as sabotage and hacker attacks, or using biological and chemical weapons to destroy Taiwan's military infrastructure, command systems, and political and business centers in a short time.

"The goal of such tactics is to devastate the morale of our armed forces and citizens. This threat is strikingly similar to terrorism in nature," he added.

The US delegation member said that in addition to discussing Chinese infiltrators, the delegation would also exchange its views with Taipei on China's increasingly aggressive submarine force.

He said the US is concerned about incursions by Chinese submarines into the waters surrounding Japan and the Pacific Ocean east of Taiwan.

"A Chinese nuclear submarine made an incursion into waters near Okinawa last November, which really angered and affected Japan," he said.

The US is also concerned about China's acquisition of advanced Kilo-class attack submarines from Russia, he said.

He added that the US is seeking to share intelligence with Taiwan about anti-submarine warfare.

He said several delegations of US military personal would be arriving in Taipei in succession to observe the annual Han Kuang (Han Glory) exercises.

In related news, a Chinese newspaper yesterday said that the former commander of US Pacific Command, Admiral Thomas Fargo, will lead the US' biggest-ever delegation to watch this year's war games, which begin next month.

Japan will also send military personnel to Taipei, the paper said.

The report said the nation's military is preparing to conduct joint computer war games with the US and Japan, and the military will link up with the US military's Pacific headquarters in Hawaii for the first time.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; dod; military; taiwan; talks; wargames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: redgolum

I debated on joining the military after 9/11 but decided not to.

China, however. I'll be first in line. Serious, serious issue. Not to be taken lightly.


41 posted on 03/17/2005 12:51:16 PM PST by Crazieman (Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

"Strangely, with no real evidence, I don't think the Party wants a war--at least not this soon, not yet. If the communists thought for a moment that the US and Japan would stand down while they invaded Taiwan, they would begin immediately."

Agreed with your speculation. Here is my speculation: Taiwan is the little ploy to start a big war. The real play is the Middle East. We could stop them just like Japan in WWII in the Pacific and the Chinese know this.

However, we get involved in Taiwan and China uses this as an excuse to attack our "allies" namely Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Their army could roll right through the Middle East and if they cut our supply of oil off, their would be nothing we could do to stop them, pending using nukes on them.


42 posted on 03/17/2005 1:13:31 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Guht

"What worries me the most is that if China does decide to move decisively against the ROC then they will also know that we will in some way retaliate. Simple causality. However, the question then becomes what happens if they decide to unload around 600 billion in US Treasuries? It could theoretically bring our country to an economic standstill by completely devaluing our currency."

Exactly. If/when they do this, we will see a depression here and will not be able to support our massive military. We may be able to protect ourselves in America but we certainly won't be able to prevent China from running amock in say, Kuwait or Saudi Arabia where we get our oil from.


43 posted on 03/17/2005 1:22:06 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior

"What do you guys think would happen if China attacked Taiwan? If we repelled an attack do you think we would go all the way and topple the communist regime? What do you guys think North Korea and Russia will do if war breaks out with China?"

I believe we will see North Korea attack South Korea within 6 months of China attacking Taiwan. Then I would say that Russia will attack a weak, socialite Europe. As one poster mentions, the Chinese can bankrupt us instantly if they want to, but not yet - they are patient and will build their military up for at least another 5-7 years in my opinion before they do this. Then, as we sit trying to keep things intact domestically, they will make their move. Right now we outgun their navy in all areas but they are quickly catching up. I also think they want the prestige of the Olympics in 2008 kind of like Hitler in pre-WWII.


44 posted on 03/17/2005 1:28:40 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior

"Waiting and appeasing China is only allowing them to choose the perfect timing of an invasion and allowing them to become more powerful. Let's push them until they back down when it comes to Taiwan or attack while they are less prepared then they will be in the future."

Thats a good point but like everything else it's politics. Does Bush want to be the President blamed for a major depression and starting WWIII?


45 posted on 03/17/2005 1:33:09 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

Time to sell 300-400 Thermo-Nuclear warheads and intermediate range missles to Taiwan.


46 posted on 03/17/2005 1:40:14 PM PST by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guht

those that would take the brunt haven't been as involved in
Iraq as the ground troops -- the subs and other carrier groups.


47 posted on 03/17/2005 1:41:09 PM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Guht

"To the comment that 600 billion isn't all that much in treasuries. I completely disagree especially if it is taken in conjunction with a complete nationalization of all factories in the PRC. If you personally have enough liquidity to purchase them I congratulate you, however, from what I've seen of the most recent set of economic data, most Americans simply put do not have the savings to prop up our debt in that manner. If you follow the economic/business news then you are no doubt aware that even Warren Buffet is moving away from the dollar and into European markets, and the saying is where the Wizard goes Wall Street follows.

Free trade has been an unmitigated disaster for most Americans, and the national security angle of relocating our manufacturing capacity in China has not been covered in the MSM (am I surprised of course not)."

Good points but Warren Buffet didn't exactly please his investors this year with almost nil movement of their funds.
The real bad news is oil. After 9/11 we should have dumped 100 billion dollars into building massive synthetic oil plants and ethenol conversion facilities. Because with our own energy independance, we can overcome anything. Without it, recovering indeed will take decades and you can be sure China and Russia will own 1/2 the globe by then.


48 posted on 03/17/2005 1:42:26 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: quantfive

I tend to think that, to the Chinese, Taiwan is an end of itself, although an invasion of the island might have a broader aim. Who can know with any certainty what the Chinese intend? Such an assault would certainly have a global ripple. Any opponent would want to disrupt our economy as much as possible, and oil is a notorious Achilles heel for the US. I disagree, however, that the Chinese would find a Middle Eastern adventure the stroll through the park you describe. It is easier to sink tankers to disrupt our oil supply than it is to send ground forces rampaging through thousands of miles of hostile desert.


49 posted on 03/17/2005 1:43:47 PM PST by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Guht

Any war with Red China will not be a land war on mainland China.


50 posted on 03/17/2005 1:45:00 PM PST by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

the book Revelation is coming to fruition faster than anyone can imagine...
51 posted on 03/17/2005 1:46:19 PM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

As North Korea is China's attack dog, make Taiwan ours. Give them, under our supervision, nuclear warheads and announce that Taiwan has the bomb and if China attacks Taiwan will retaliate. Then what do they do?


52 posted on 03/17/2005 1:51:25 PM PST by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dmartin

"Allowing the invasion of Taiwan by the PRC is unacceptable. After Taiwan, they will move outward to the other islands and territories that they claim. Even if we decided not to act, millions would die."

I doubt that, once they reached the Phillipines their fleet would be in range of the full power of our air force coming in from the West coast and thats IF they could destroy our fleet. Japan did it at Pearl Harbor but only because their was no such thing as advanced radar sattelites. My guess is that they would move on the Middle East and claim oil based assets.


53 posted on 03/17/2005 1:56:22 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ml1954

What do you mean "bomb them back to the stone age" they never left the stone age. They still plant rice by hand and build roads with hand shovels. More like, bomb them until they starve, would be more accurate.


54 posted on 03/17/2005 1:58:51 PM PST by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue
They have nukes now, I imagine.

We should give tactical nukes to Japan, and continue to support their rearmament.
55 posted on 03/17/2005 2:03:57 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

"I disagree, however, that the Chinese would find a Middle Eastern adventure the stroll through the park you describe. It is easier to sink tankers to disrupt our oil supply than it is to send ground forces rampaging through thousands of miles of hostile desert."

Not a walk in the park no, but limitless supply of ground forces supported by an increasing advanced air-force and I don't see what country could stop them. After all, we are 7,000 from supply routes, vs. 500 or less miles for them. i doubt it is something they consider plausible today but they seem to be advanced long-term thinkers.


56 posted on 03/17/2005 2:10:22 PM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue

I meant the coastal cities and their high tech (=post 1990 technology) manufacturing facilities. You're right, 99% of the country is still in the stone age.


57 posted on 03/17/2005 2:17:21 PM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Guht
It could theoretically bring our country to an economic standstill by completely devaluing our currency.

It could also bring China to an economic standstill by devaluing it's primary investment and disrupting it's primary source of income.

Most of the economic implications have symmetry. We "fund" them by buying their products. They "fund" us by buying t-bills and selling us inexpensive products.
58 posted on 03/17/2005 2:47:52 PM PST by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue
Such an approach would be disastrous diplomatically. The US would lose all credibility in any nuclear nonproliferation talks. Further, support for such a move would be virtually nonexistent among the American public, almost certainly ensuring a Democratic presidency next time around--which, by the way, the Chinese no doubt very badly want. And while China probably views North Korean bomb-building and saber-rattling as occasionally useful, it is unlikely that communist Korea views itself as anyone's catspaw. I don't think your 'attack dog' analogy holds up.

The object of the game is to win, but winning must be defined. Winning, in my view, entails a Taiwan that continues to enjoy its independence without fighting a war conceivably more bloody and devastating than the last global conflict we had. If we maintain vigilance and convince the Chinese communists that armed conflict with the US and its allies would be a no-win scenario from one day to the next, and if the Chinese--over time--evolve into a state that seeks advantage in trade rather than conquest, then we stand a chance at winning.

But to answer your question. I think that if we give Taiwan the bomb, 'supervised' or otherwise, the Chinese communists will view it as a provocation that must be answered. Caving on such an issue would be an unacceptable loss of face. We would have war. Lastly--and most importantly--if such a war comes, we must be able to say to the dead that we did all we could to prevent it.
59 posted on 03/17/2005 2:48:35 PM PST by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: quantfive
The way I see it. Once China takes (if they succeed) Taiwan they will cry for peace. They will ask the world to just let it go, the UN and most of the world will comply. Their next major step WILL be Japan and this whole business of theirs will start all over again, just as with Taiwan (Taiwan was never theirs to begain with.) A few years will pass before they strike Japan.

The Chinese government is setting up a lot of propaganda in preparation for war against Japan.

60 posted on 03/17/2005 3:09:23 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson