To: Alex Marko
Clones of these to appear at a War Zone near you soon.
2 posted on
03/17/2005 12:16:59 PM PST by
drt1
To: Alex Marko
The black legacy of the Soviet Union continues to haunt the world
3 posted on
03/17/2005 12:24:12 PM PST by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: Alex Marko
I favor sending cruise missles to Iran especially if they are followed by JDAMs.
8 posted on
03/17/2005 12:35:24 PM PST by
Paleo Conservative
(I Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Alex Marko
Looks somewhat like a Russian version of our TLAM.
To: Alex Marko
The X-55 has a range of 3,000 km, enough to put Japan within striking range of the Asian continent or to reach Israel from Iran.With Iran's new "electricity producing" nuclear program, I wouldn't want to be in Israel.
14 posted on
03/17/2005 12:39:36 PM PST by
demsux
To: Alex Marko
And we helped these people last winter for what reason? I do hope the policy changes sometime soon.
To: Alex Marko
The Russians have been busy how about the Squall torpedo they sold the filthy communists in china.
30 posted on
03/17/2005 1:27:52 PM PST by
Fast1
(Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart)
To: Alex Marko
32 posted on
03/17/2005 2:36:17 PM PST by
toddlintown
(Cold out? Nah, that's just the nuclear winter.)
To: Calpernia
38 posted on
03/17/2005 4:17:10 PM PST by
nw_arizona_granny
(The enemy within, will be found in the "Communist Manifesto 1963", you are living it today.)
To: Alex Marko
Although none of the missiles was exported with the nuclear warheads they were designed to carry Yeah, I'd count on that being true. /sarcasm
To: Alex Marko
48 posted on
03/17/2005 7:34:27 PM PST by
timestax
the previous government's misdemeanours... murder
Murder, a misdemeanor? Wow. ;')
50 posted on
03/17/2005 9:57:57 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
To: Alex Marko
That's a huge story, on the surface and even deeper if you think about. I'm guessing the major networks picked this right up and ran it on the evening news... No? Ok, situation normal.
51 posted on
03/17/2005 10:24:13 PM PST by
sixmil
(In Free Trade We Trust)
To: Alex Marko
Nice missle.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/as-15.htm
52 posted on
03/17/2005 11:14:34 PM PST by
rmlew
(Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
To: Alex Marko
It appears that this missile was built in violation of the START accord (trust but verify):
May 1990 - At a ministerial meeting in Moscow, Secretary Baker and Foreign Minister Shevardnadze agree:
- To a 600-kilometer range threshold for ALCMs.
- That the first 150 U.S. heavy bombers can carry up to 20 ALCMs but will be counted as carrying 10, and the first 210 Soviet heavy bombers can carry up to 12 ALCMs but will be counted as carrying 8. After the first 150 U.S. or 210 Soviet heavy bombers, the discount will disappear.
- To limit nuclear SLCMs to 880 in number in a separate, politically binding agreement.
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) Chronology
56 posted on
03/18/2005 7:34:38 AM PST by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: GarySpFc; Destro
63 posted on
03/18/2005 11:25:53 AM PST by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
To: Alex Marko
The acquisition by Iran of cruise missiles, if proved, would heighten concerns about its nuclear weapons programme. Hate to be a grammar nazi, but shouldn't it be "The acquisition of cruise missles by Iran,......" ????
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson