Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AVNevis

I would rather see him wait and then run for the Senate in 2008. A loss in '06 would be difficult to overcome.


4 posted on 04/24/2005 9:57:03 AM PDT by Michael.SF.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.
"I would rather see him wait and then run for the Senate in 2008. A loss in '06 would be difficult to overcome."

If you can find a Senate seat for him to run for in 2008, then OK.

There is no California Senate Race in 2008.
5 posted on 04/24/2005 9:58:59 AM PDT by AVNevis (www.cahsconservative.blogspot.com Great Political Discussion from the eyes of a High School Student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Michael.SF.

I would love for Tom to run for the US Senate race in either 2006 or 2010 but his intention is not to be in Washington DC but to be in California and focus on Calfornia's issues.

As conservative Republicans, we should do whatever we can to help support and get Tom elected in California. Because I am planning on voting for him next year in both the primary as well as the general election.

Tom McClintock is the only pro-life, pro-second amendment, pro-business, anti-gay marriage, anti-illegal alien, as well the only conservative Republican candidate in California that will make a huge difference once he gets elected to replace outgoing liberal Dem Cruz Bustamante. And I know that Tom will beat liberal flower-child John Garamendi next year for the Lt. Governor's race.


23 posted on 04/24/2005 3:46:23 PM PDT by GOPXtreme20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson