1 posted on
06/25/2005 11:21:46 AM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Dear NYT's, the Humvee is a replacement for the Jeep. As a JEEP, it functions just fine. As an armored carrier it sucks...try to get it right just once.....
2 posted on
06/25/2005 11:25:46 AM PDT by
ScreamingFist
(Peace through Ignorance)
To: neverdem
3 posted on
06/25/2005 11:30:12 AM PDT by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
HMMWV
Mission
Provide a common light tactical vehicle capability. Replaced the quarter-ton jeep, M718A1 ambulance, half-ton Mule, 1.25-ton Gamma Goat, and M792 ambulance.
Entered Army Service
1985
Description and Specifications
The HMMWV (High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle) is a light, highly mobile, diesel-powered, four-wheel-drive vehicle equipped with an automatic transmission. Based on the M998 chassis, using common components and kits, the HMMWV can be configured to become a troop carrier, armament carrier, S250 shelter carrier, ambulance, TOW missile carrier, and a Scout vehicle.
4 posted on
06/25/2005 11:30:14 AM PDT by
ScreamingFist
(Peace through Ignorance)
To: neverdem
".......an examination by The New York Times has found."An examination by whom? Jason Blaire?
As the above poster points out, most politely, the HUMVEE was never meant to be armored, but since the scum at the NYT times deem it necessary to be so, it is now a shortcoming of the Bush administration.
If that's what the guppies that read the NYT have to look forward to each day, good luck sorting it out.
5 posted on
06/25/2005 11:32:58 AM PDT by
kahoutek
To: neverdem
As much as I hate the culture of negativism at the Times, sometimes they stumble on the truth.
I think everyone would agree that the Pentagon procurement system has never worked well -- it's never had the flexibility we'd like.
It's stupid to blame this on the Bush Administration, who are doing more than anyone to modernize all our defense systems. Congress is more to blame than anyone.
6 posted on
06/25/2005 11:39:37 AM PDT by
68skylark
To: neverdem
"By the time an Army National Guard member complained to Mr. Rumsfeld in December that troops were still scrounging for steel to fortify their Humvees, the Pentagon's troubles with armoring vehicles had been years in the making."
No mention that this was a MSM planted question, not a Guard member complaint.
7 posted on
06/25/2005 11:49:19 AM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: neverdem
Armor on the humpv does only one thing. Helps protect you from small arms fire. If a (Russian made) RPG can take out an M1A1, what good is hanging some thin plated armor on a hummer?
9 posted on
06/25/2005 11:54:41 AM PDT by
TGOGary
(I would blow my brains out before ever wearing a blue beret!)
To: neverdem
And what would the NYT say when we blew up the DOD budget by providing DEDICATED wheeled armored vehicles in place of every HMMWV?
19 posted on
06/25/2005 1:21:28 PM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson