[volvox]

My understanding is there are two rulings too. We only have the first one so far. From what I am reading, it has been reported that the opinion doesn't rule against a sacred text intergrated with governmental text on history and law, but rather they believe this display was religiously motivated.

[nina0113]

...they believe this display was religiously motivated.

So we're into the 'thought crime' mode. Well, it's the same thing all those stupid hate-crime laws are based on.