Posted on 07/20/2005 3:56:48 PM PDT by Redcitizen
DENVER - A few weeks ago, two police cars and two animal control vehicles pulled up at the home of Stef'ny Steffan looking for her beloved 4-year-old pit bull, Xena. Seven officers hauled the animal off to the city shelter, putting her on death row. Xena became an outlaw after Denver won a court fight and reinstated one of the toughest pit-bull bans in the nation.
Since May, more than 380 dogs have been impounded and at least 260 destroyed — an average of more than three a day.
Dog owners are in a panic. Some are using an underground railroad of sorts, sending their pets to live elsewhere or hiding them from authorities. City officials would not estimate how many people might be violating the ordinance.
Some owners, like Steffan, have won a reprieve for their pets with help from a rescue group. The group got Xena released by signing an affidavit stating that the animal would never return to Denver. The group took the dog to Mariah's Promise in Divide, an animal sanctuary that has accepted more than three dozen pit bulls from Denver.
For Steffan and her partner, Gina Black, leaving Xena 60 miles from home was a lousy option but the only one they had.
"It's safer than animal control. Safer than keeping her underground — at least she'll be able to play now," Steffan said. "But she'll miss us. We're her pack."
Denver is one of three major metropolitan areas, along with Miami and Cincinnati, to ban pit bulls, according to Glen Bui, vice president of the American Canine Foundation.
Pit bull typically describes three kinds of dogs — the American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. But Denver's ban applies to any dog that looks like a pit bull. The animal's actual behavior does not matter.
City Councilman Charlie Brown said that in his judgment, "pit bulls are trained to attack. They're bred to do that."
Critics of the ban use words like "annihilation" and "genocide," and the city shelter has received e-mails likening animal control officers to Nazis.
"Breed bans are just a knee-jerk reaction to something that happened in the community," Bui said.
Denver banned pit bulls in 1989 after dogs mauled a minister and killed a boy in separate attacks. The Legislature passed a law in 2004 that prohibited breed-specific bans, but the city sued and a judge ruled in April the law was an unconstitutional violation of local control.
Critics of the ordinance say that a blanket ban on an entire breed is misguided that the law should instead target irresponsible owners and all dangerous dogs.
"If anyone says one dog is more likely to kill — unless there's a study out there that I haven't seen — that's not based on scientific data," said Julie Gilchrist, a doctor at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who researches dog bites.
The CDC, the American Veterinary Medical Association and the Humane Society of the United States examined 20 years of dog-bite data and concluded that pit bulls and Rottweilers caused the most deaths.
But the researchers also noted that fatal attacks represent a small proportion of dog-bite injuries and that the number of bites per breed simply seems to rise with their popularity.
At the city shelter, pit bulls are cordoned off from other dogs in what has become death row. Nearly 100 pit bulls have been released to live outside the county. A nonresident must guarantee the dog will never return to Denver.
Sonya Dias, who is moving out of Denver because of the ban, said she was a little intimidated by her pit bull when she first saw him. But "when I said, `Hey little doggie,' his whole body just started wagging." Gryffindor is staying at Mariah's Promise until Dias sells her home.
"He's been dangerous to a couple of pairs of shoes and some mini-blinds," Dias said. "But otherwise he's a jewel."
They'll just pick a new breed to train.
Dog registration leads to confiscation.
No, guns don't decide on their own to eat human children. Click keyword "DOGOFPEACE" above if you are under the illusion that pit bulls are compatible with a civilized society.
When assault dogs are outlawed, only outlaws will have assault dogs. Do you see any parallels to gun laws?
-----
There is ONE difference. Guns must have a person pulling the trigger...pit bulls do not. We have seen the horrors of this too many times.
ping
Wacky Denverites and their wacky home-rule.
City Councilman Charlie Brown said that in his judgment, "kite trees are trained to attack. They're bred to do that."
My Glock's never bit anyone. It doesn't even bark.
I've known just as many people attacked by German shepherds as pit bulls, but nobody has every suggested banning German shepherds.
As an earlier poster said, the thug culture that celebrates pit bulls for their violent tendencies will just find some other dog to train--probably Rottweilers.
My pregnant wife and I sustained a pit bull attack 18 years ago from which we still carry scars. While I don't in general support targeted bans such as this, I can see the city's side.
You mean when the pitbull gets loose and steals the life of a two year old? I agree, it is strong arm theft..
Interesting that they are arresting pit bulls in Denver but allowing illegal aliens to roam free and they are not even required to be on a leash. I recall that recently an illegal alien pulled the trigger on a cop and then fled to Mexico where he is still happily avoiding American justice. I bet if one went through the record one would find that lots more violence had been committed in Denver by illegal aliens then by pit bulls yet the city officials are expending lots of energy enforcing the law against pit bulls but won't lift a finger to protect the citizenry from that other vicious breed.
Why would anyone even WANT one with their record of attacks??
I knew someone would mention the children sooner or later.This law is a knee jerk reaction to a few well publicized cases. My point is that if you follow the logic of the law, we should ban cars,guns,snakes,etc since children are at risk of dying from these things.
Good point......deport all of both!
My reaction is well-considered. Yours is the jerked knee. Perhaps if you thought about it you might find a difference between an animal that has been bred to kill and an inanimate object that requires a human being to control it (and thus take responsibility for the consequences of its use).
In the case of snakes, that's a borderline situation. If we found that pet snakes were routinely attacking and killing human beings on their own motivation, then it would be appropriate to consider banning them as well.
That's a self-answering question. People want pit bulls to threaten their neighbors and compensate for unusally small genitalia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.