Posted on 08/09/2005 6:09:18 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
"Why are Republicans such a spineless bunch of nice guys? Attorney John Ashcroft was the only one appearing before that commission with guts. I think it cost him his job,but I could be wrong. I've certainly been wrong before in my thinking."
You're right!
I think Lehman stayed on the commission in order to at least publish what they had.
What I find most astonishing is that here is Weldon, # 2 Republican on Defense giving information to the Commission staffers and is for the most part being ignored.
I fully expect to see the Jersey Girls making the rounds on Hardball and the morning Soccer Mom brainwashing shows (Today, GMA, etc) to blame 9-11 on Clinton now.
Snicker, snicker.
Rep. Weldon better watch his back.
...were told about the "program"? Is this a way to 'sugar-coat' the impact of what they "were told"?, ie. were they told about the Able Danger "program" in general, or about the 'specific' operation that identified Atta and the 3 other hijackers? Funny how the reporter does not go into much detail here. Sounds like this is tyupical 'reporter coverup'.
Hillary filed the reports with her Rose Law Firm records.
"Rep. Weldon better watch his back."
He's actually a pretty powerful guy with lots of operative type friends in domestic and foreign intelligence agiencies, The House & Senate, as well as free access to talk radio in PA, NJ and DE.
Weldon is also an expert on North Korea and Iran.
What did Clinton do at Ruby Ridge?
Makes ya sick bump.
ping
Ping - Bill Clinton's name is again resurfacing on the FR board.
What did Hillary know and when did she know it?
I agree... lets be careful... this could happen again in this country. I used to think the US was tough on terror and Europe was weak. I am now convinced that Britain has a better grasp on what needs to be done proactively. The ACLU would not allow the US to anything with Atta especially since he was here legally.
.....yep........... Darn, I got to remember all those.
His attorney general / arsonist-in-chief helped obscure the facts of what happened.
Exactly! In fact, it was only months after the 1993 WTC attack that those nasty Christians at Waco were laid seige to...and murdered. It wasn't long after this that the Freeman in Montana also became targets of the federal government. Even after the OKC bombing...with an Arab-looking 3rd John Doe at large, it was Clinton who attacked Rush Limbaugh and the militia movement, making the far-right the worst enemy America had.
Throughout his term...even with Arab terrorism on the rise, Clinton did everything he could to appease the terrorists. And this included both foreign and military aid to Christian-hostile governments like those in Indonesia...or direct participation such as that in Serbia/Kosovo.
Part of my theory about this is not only Clinton's (and the Left's) hositility to Christianity...but his crusade for a legacy that included peace in the Middle-East. From the moment he stepped foot in office, he wasn't going to let anything, including what he percieved as a Christian/Israeli-bias, interfere with his plans.
In other words, Clinton couldn't (wouldn't) be tough on terrorism because he knew that had the potential to disrupt whatever plans he had; he didn't want to p*ssoff the Mid-East. Ironically, as he was targeting Christians around the country...and treating Muslim terrorists with kid gloves, not only did his peace-plan fail...so did the goodwill he tried to bridge with Islamofacsists as the attacks continued. Appeasement didn't work.
My tag line pretty well sums it up............
I read your mind, do you think this will be a big story, especially since the 9/11 commisars MISSED it, or OMITTED it from their report?< sarcasm on >
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman
HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.