Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cunningham convicted [of shooting man who raped her daughter]
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 10/28/5 | ROBERT WILSON

Posted on 10/28/2005 10:09:54 AM PDT by SmithL

MARYVILLE — Kimberly Cunningham, the 33-year-old South Knoxville woman who shot to death a man she believes raped her daughter twice when the child was 10, was convicted today of voluntary manslaughter in the man's death.

The verdict was returned about 10 a.m. by the seven-woman, five-man jury after five hours of deliberation Thursday and one hour today.

Cunningham had been on trial on a charge of second-degree murder, but the jury acquitted her of that and found her guilty of the lesser charge. She had already been tried once in the death of Coy Hundley.

In that trial last April, she was acquitted of first-degree murder, and the jury deadlocked on all lesser charges.

Cunningham will be sentenced on Dec. 19 by Judge D. Kelly Thomas in Blount County Circuit Court.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: childmolestor; manslaughter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: bk1000

Sounds like double jeopardy to me. The prosecution should be able to take their best, most likely shot.

One time. One time only.

IMHO, somebody here has conspired to violate her constitutional rights, but it's hard to say, because this was not a federal trial. Not sure what the State constitution of Tennessee says.


21 posted on 10/28/2005 10:23:44 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
If the guy had,in fact,raped her daughter then she should get a week behind bars and 5 hours of community service.

I dunno about the 'behind bars' part, but if the 5-hours of community service involve teaching women how to handle a gun, I agree...

22 posted on 10/28/2005 10:23:47 AM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (We know the right things to do, why don't we just do them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: patent
Still doesn't seem right. Keep trying until something sticks?

as the TV commercial says - "that ain't right".
23 posted on 10/28/2005 10:24:40 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

It ain't right. Give the same crime 25 different definitions, then keep trying till ya get one thats sticks!

It AIN'T right!


24 posted on 10/28/2005 10:26:30 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The woman was tried a second time because the jury hung on the second-degree charge.

The system didn't have a chance to work in this case (not that there's any guarantee it would have). Her daughter told her the guy had raped her, mom confronted him that day, and then shot him eight times, pausing to reload.


25 posted on 10/28/2005 10:30:24 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

She should be put on probation. The condition of her probation will require her to give speeches calling for a mandatory death penalty for all child rapists -- it'll get rid of child rapists, and it'll prevent mothers like her from going to prison. A real twofer.


26 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:45 AM PDT by GOPJ (NYT: How many times do you ask for an error to be corrected before the "error" becomes a "lie"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
She was prosecuted for a number of charges. The jury decided that she was not guilty of 1st degree murder, but they couldn't agree if she was guilty of voluntary manslaughter or not.

This was a retrial only on the charges that the jury couldn't decide on.

27 posted on 10/28/2005 10:32:43 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

give her a medal and new better home to live in, in a nicer neighborhood

sponser her on speaking tour on how to protect your family


28 posted on 10/28/2005 10:32:52 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

There was another thread about this.
The daughter who is now 14 told her mom that this guy had raped her.
The mom confronted the guy at work, he admitted it and said there was nothing she could do about it. In a smarmy fashion.

She unloaded her gun into him, reloaded and continued.

Personally, I would have just shot his testicles off and smiled at him every time I saw him.

I think she would have not even gotten a trial.


29 posted on 10/28/2005 10:35:02 AM PDT by netmilsmom (God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

He's innocent until proven guilty.

Having said that, I too would have killed him if I thought he had raped my daughter.


30 posted on 10/28/2005 10:35:47 AM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What happens if another man committed the crime?


31 posted on 10/28/2005 10:38:01 AM PDT by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
She unloaded her gun into him, reloaded and continued.

I like the "reloaded and continued" part. It demonstrates dedication!

32 posted on 10/28/2005 10:40:00 AM PDT by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud; SmithL

Set her free and bought her a new box of ammo!


33 posted on 10/28/2005 10:40:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch (No expiration date on the oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Well, let's face it. If she was tried for anything, it should have been manslaughter. Heat of the moment kind of thing, diminished capacity.

I don't understand how it can come out of a grand jury to indict her on multiple counts for the same offense... and without Grand Jury approval, the prosecution should be stuck twiddling his thumbs.

The whole deadlocked jury/mistrial thingy is a MISUNDERSTANDING of the intent. And I've read alot of it.
They wanted to insure that UNLESS THERE WAS A UNANIMOUS verdict, then no crime had been committed. A cultural sort of thing, if the folks themselves could not even agree that what the person did was a crime, the government was powerless to prosecute.

It's not supposed to be a "give the government unlimited shots at getting a conviction" thing.


34 posted on 10/28/2005 10:40:15 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: djf

Exactly. When the DA's office isn't sure of winning a crime they're prosecuting this is what happens. A person may have comitted one crime, but they will be charged on multiple counts. Sometimes it's a "good" thing because they really are going after bad guys. But in many cases, these are just "political" crimes (eg, hate crimes, vigilantism) and the DA wants to make a point.


35 posted on 10/28/2005 10:40:45 AM PDT by two134711 (Haven't we learned by now not to trust the AP to tell the whole truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy
What happens if another man committed the crime?

Then the deceased, who reportedly admitted to the crime, deserved to die for stupidity.

36 posted on 10/28/2005 10:41:09 AM PDT by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

A dead rapist or child molester will never become a repeat offender.


37 posted on 10/28/2005 10:42:03 AM PDT by B4Ranch (No expiration date on the oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"Vigilanteism is the direct result of an ineffective criminal justice system. People take the law into their own hands because the authorities refuse to do their jobs, and because of the public perception that justice will not be done unless they do. "

I always thought that public police departments were the direct result of people not properly policing after themselves. City police departments are a fairly new invention.


38 posted on 10/28/2005 10:44:47 AM PDT by Geritol (All I need is another hole in my head...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah

>> I like the "reloaded and continued" part. It demonstrates dedication!<<

When my hubby read the original story, he stated that he would be that dedicated if someone touched one of his girls.

He would be proud to go to jail for it too.


39 posted on 10/28/2005 10:48:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom (God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

I am not saying she should have gotten off. I'm saying that the guy should not have been on the street. Of course, we don't really know if he had any priors, but most crimes are committed by repeat offenders. It would not happen if our politicians and our judicial system would do their jobs instead of blaming "society" for crime, and letting the perps go free.


40 posted on 10/28/2005 10:49:23 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson