Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just how responsible can pornographers be?
CNETnews.com ^ | November 5th, 2005 | Who is Truth?

Posted on 11/05/2005 6:30:54 AM PST by Who is Truth?

Voluntary .xxx Domain "for Responsible Companies" 8/23/2005 1:12:00 PM

Just how responsible can pornographers be?

The latest proposal for new website domains is (dot) xxx, which would theoretically distinguish these websites from others as being pornographic. The Bush administration is objecting to the creation of a dot xxx domain, and Michael Gallagher, assistant secretary at the Commerce Department, has asked for a hold to be placed on the contract to run the new top-level domain until the .xxx suffix can receive further scrutiny.

Gallagher stated, "The Department of Commerce has received nearly 6,000 letters and e-mails from individuals expressing concern about the impact of pornography on families and children."

ICM Registry--the for-profit company in Florida that plans to operate the .xxx registry--has told reported that it would agree to a month's delay in the approval process to permit it to "address the concerns" raised by the Bush administration and other governments.

Jason Hendeles, founder of ICM Registry, says, "We're focusing our attention on the Department of Commerce and ensuring that we're building this as a voluntary (top-level domain) for responsible companies."

The big question that looms is: Just how responsible can pornographers be?

Source: CNET news.com, August 15, 2005


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Khepera

:^)


21 posted on 11/05/2005 6:58:00 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?
"No, that would be the FREEDOM OF SPEECH should be free."

ALL speech should be free, or can we, as a society, decide that some speech is too offensive?

22 posted on 11/05/2005 6:58:25 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
and all pornography should be FREE by law.

See the OSP (open source porn) initiative.

23 posted on 11/05/2005 7:06:55 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?
For all who noticed and raised an eyebrow or two, I made a very bad mistake. I am not the author of that article nor did I intend to take the credit for the article. It was my bad for thinking wrongly when it asked for the author. I thought they were talking the author of the POST, which is me.

Letfreedomring.com did not have the author listed, just the source as CNETnews.com.

Once again, I DID NOT WRITE THE "Just how responsible can pornographers be? article.

My apologies to the author. Please forgive me.
24 posted on 11/05/2005 7:09:13 AM PST by Who is Truth? (TRUTH is not relative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

I don't think anyone has answered your question as to why the Bush administration would object to the .xxx domain. I think it's a good idea. It would make it much easier to filter out the garbage when surfing the web, yet still protect "free speech" concerns.


25 posted on 11/05/2005 7:10:26 AM PST by manwiththehands (Big Lie #1: "Islam is a peaceful religion"; Big Lie #2: Bush "lied")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I think it is a good ideal as well. What tropical hell-hole has been chosen for their new domain?


26 posted on 11/05/2005 7:24:04 AM PST by Dionysius (ACLU is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

How would this affect foreign domain sites? I have a feeling these people would find a work around to continue to prey upon unsuspecting people.


27 posted on 11/05/2005 7:38:57 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

.xxx should only be allowed if the administrators of the .com, .biz, .net, etc domains ban porn sites from their control -- otherwise it is completely pointless.

porn is a drug and it works just like other drugs... by luring. pornographers are not going to happily isolate themselves into a corner where they can be easily blocked and ignored. it just is not going to happen by default.

on top of that you're going to have companies having to buy (and thus financially support) their .xxx domain to protect it. ibm.xxx, microsoft.xxx, whitehouse.xxx, etc.

the .xxx domain just give pornographers free reign w/o bumping them off of the existing domains.

now, i would FULLY support putting them in their own red light district if it also got them out of the business/commercial district.


28 posted on 11/05/2005 7:49:25 AM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; Who is Truth?
For all who noticed and raised an eyebrow or two, I made a very bad mistake. I am not the author of that article nor did I intend to take the credit for the article. It was my bad for thinking wrongly when it asked for the author. I thought they were talking the author of the POST, which is me.

Letfreedomring.com did not have the author listed, just the source as CNETnews.com.

Once again, I DID NOT WRITE THE "Just how responsible can pornographers be? article.

My apologies to the author. Please forgive me.

Mods, please make the fix?

29 posted on 11/05/2005 8:05:09 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...

+


30 posted on 11/05/2005 8:06:04 AM PST by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

Getting the pornsters to yank up their .com and .net roots and go to .xxx would be unenforceable in many parts of the world. A lot of porn is US based but by no means all of it.


31 posted on 11/05/2005 8:08:15 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
.xxx will never work as porn companies (most which are based overseas anyway) will easily circumvent it.

Besides, the free market is already taking care of online porn. There's tons of blockers and programs that consumers can buy, such as NetNanny and Cybersitter.

32 posted on 11/05/2005 8:10:28 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Harmful or Fatal if Swallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: narses

" + " what does this mean?


33 posted on 11/05/2005 8:43:03 AM PST by Who is Truth? (TRUTH is not relative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

They'd be free to produce any kind of garbage and, as long as it's rated properly, be free to market it.



What bkind of garbage are you worried about them marketing that they aren't already?


34 posted on 11/05/2005 9:25:16 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"What bkind of garbage are you worried about them marketing that they aren't already?"

Oh, they already are? Well then, they certainly don't need a .XXX domain then do they?

35 posted on 11/05/2005 9:36:30 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

Later pingout. An xxx domain is better than what there is now. At least the sickness can be contained.


36 posted on 11/05/2005 10:17:05 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

Michael Moore was hoping to use that domain for his personal line of plus-size designer clothing stores. :0)


37 posted on 11/05/2005 10:22:35 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is Truth?

The Sign of the Cross.


38 posted on 11/05/2005 11:34:47 AM PST by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson