Skip to comments.
Is Hillary a centrist? Lets look at her votes
(S)Newsday ^
| 11 / 14 / 2005
| Raymond J. Keating
Posted on 11/14/2005 12:32:16 PM PST by Personal Responsibility
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: ssaftler
95%, eh? Wonder how Barbara Box-car, Teddy "the Drowner" and Chuckie Schumer scored?For 2004:
Boxer - 95%
Kennedy - 100%
Schumer - 100%
Tied with Boxer. I'd say that's pretty far-left.
21
posted on
11/14/2005 1:04:46 PM PST
by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
(left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
To: Personal Responsibility
While her husband generally grasps the benefits of free trade - noting in his speech "trade lifts people out of poverty" - Sen. Clinton opposed the Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement this past June. Ten Senate Democrats voted for it. Another blow against Hillary's moderation. Lots of Freepers opposed it as well. I'd even go so far to say half or more Freepers oppose it.
22
posted on
11/14/2005 1:06:38 PM PST
by
gg188
To: Personal Responsibility
She could be to the right of Barry Goldwater and I would never vote for her.
To: johnmecainrino
If she comes out pro-choice, anti-illegal-immigration, and anti iraq war, she might be a shoo in.
Unless the pubbies have a powerhouse to offer like Guliani.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just my prediction after watching the mood of the country.
24
posted on
11/14/2005 1:09:22 PM PST
by
djf
(Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
To: Personal Responsibility
Off topic but important:
Senator Rockefeller (D), Senate Intelligence Committee, admits on FNC yesterday that he went alone to Syria, Saudi Arabia and Jordan to tell them that, although a decision had not been announced, he was certain the US was going to invade Iraq.
If this isn't treason, nothing is.
A sitting intelligence committee member travels to countries not terribly favorable to us (with the exception of Jordan) to let them know the military is coming to their region.
Contact the White House and your senator and demand an investigation.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1521893/posts
25
posted on
11/14/2005 1:13:50 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: djf
What do you mean, "if she come out pro-choice?" She always has been. What benefit is that going have in the general election?
26
posted on
11/14/2005 1:14:19 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: djf
Hillary can't come out anti illegal immigration because she has a voting record of sucking up to illegals.
Why is Hillary not held to account for her voting record. Why is she allowed to vote for illegals and then talk differently to appease others.
Saying Hillary can run being anti illegal would be like Bill Clinton running saying he never had an affair.
Hillary should be judged on her voting record.
To: djf
Hillary is an absolute fraud she has a voting record that she will never be able to hide from. You can compare her voting record with her words and show how she has no leadership capacity.
To: johnmecainrino
Dear Hillary,
Something about that "take all of your money for the common good" thing will kill you on 08. I don't think anyone took your Marxist remark out of context.
Regards
The Republican Party
29
posted on
11/14/2005 1:20:52 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: djf
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, and I'm sure I'll say it many more times before the 2008 primaries.
Hillary will win the north east and the west coast with no problem. All she has to do is appear centrist with some of the Great Lake states and a few in the midwest for them to flip from red to blue.
Clinton knows how to raise money.
Clinton has the MSM on her/their side.
People are running FROM Republican/Conservatism right now.
All this can change in three years, of course. But if I was a betting man, I certainly wouldn't be betting against Hillary at this moment.
If you want to take the legs out of Hillary's advantages (or at least out of her perceived advantages as of today) you run somebody who can make a run at the north eastern states, while holding onto the south.
Does such a candidate exisist?
30
posted on
11/14/2005 1:21:01 PM PST
by
birbear
(Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
To: birbear
Make a run at the northeastern states?
They are rinos up there. The northeaster states are lost to us for good.
We need a conservative that can appeal to the south and midwest. States like Wisconsin, Iowa, and Ohio are the keys. That is the needle you have to thread and also appeal to the growing southwestern states that are coming more into play because of california transplants and illegals.
To: johnmecainrino
Voting record ,scmoting record.
The LSM will be gushing over her so hard that people will forget that she's even in the senate,or a former first lady/co-president.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 78 percent in 2003-2004. 2001-2002 On the votes that the American Civil Liberties Union considered to be the most important in 2001-2002 , Senator Clinton voted their preferred position 60 percent of the time. 2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Family Research Council 0 percent in 2004. 2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 0 percent in 2004. 2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 0 percent in 2004. 2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 85 percent in 2003-2004. 2003 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 82 percent in 2003. 2002 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 100 percent in 2002. Thanks for the links Diane. The record says it all. Stop the spin.
33
posted on
11/14/2005 1:26:21 PM PST
by
Dr. Ed Bravo
(The Doctor is back!)
To: Personal Responsibility
Of course Hillary is a centrist! In the old Soviet Politburo, that is!
To: Old Seadog
35
posted on
11/14/2005 1:33:42 PM PST
by
Froufrou
To: Personal Responsibility
...."Is Hilliary and idiot?"....
YES, YES, NOT ONLY YES BUT HELL YES!!!!!
36
posted on
11/14/2005 1:35:02 PM PST
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Personal Responsibility
37
posted on
11/14/2005 1:42:13 PM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: nickcarraway
I know she always has been. But the dems platform will be based, at least in part, by who is the nominee.
And if she gets it, you can bet everything that she will play that "I'm not one of those MEN who want to take away your right to chose" card.
And it will be very effective.
38
posted on
11/14/2005 1:44:57 PM PST
by
djf
(Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
To: gg188
I oppose all "free trade" agreements on the grounds that in reality they turn out, without exception, to be sucker deals in which we are the sucker.
To: Personal Responsibility
The question is frikkin ABSURD!
The Hitlery is a foaming at the mouth Marxist ideologue who hates the United States of America.
She is the "Devil" incarnate, (you'd have figured he'd do better on the physical structure, but oh well), she is the blood enemy of America and our way of life.
No hyperbole here, she is evil.
The question is frikkin ABSURD!
Spin RATs!
SPIN!
40
posted on
11/14/2005 2:12:12 PM PST
by
porkchops 4 mahound
("Si vis pacem, para bellum", If you wish peace, prepare for war.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson