Posted on 11/26/2005 2:45:51 PM PST by mojito
On the plus side, maybe AJ is at the very least a little uncomfortable, knowing that this was either jokingly (according to some) or seriously (according to others) considered. Let them sweat.
Just send Katie Couric, Dan Rather, and Stewart Smalley there undercover as Anchors.
That's because Billy Graham doesn't issue 'fatwahs' against people who offend the "religion of peace".
Bad Idea! he should take out the satellite. Al Jazeera can always rebuild a building, but it takes time to get another satellite up in orbit!
NOw THAT plane is decked out for the Holidays!! :)
I remember during the initial phase of the Iraqi operation we killed one of their reporters. Their reaction was quite a contrast when they explained why they showed videos of dead American soldiers being taunted by Iraqi's. But when one of their own was killed they were a little more somber about it.
Heavens no they shouldn't consider bombing Al Jazeera. They should just do it!
How about an Abrams Tank pulling right through the front door "live?"
Just found an interesting site for any of those that think we "tolerate" a bit too much. Make certain you check the terror list for the last year. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/default.htm#attacks
IF GWB had actually wanted al-Jazeera to be bombed, its HQ would be a "crater" today.
On the other hand, if one is to be "blamed" for doing something which DID NOT HAPPEN, what is the downside for "doing the deed"?
Everything you said is dead on BUMP!
Margaret Thatcher:
"Democratic nations must try to find ways to starve the terrorist and the hijacker of the oxygen of publicity on which they depend."
So yes, Al jazeera should be bombed!!
IMHO, blast away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.