[sweetliberty]

Wonder if it's the women or the writer that doesn't know the difference between contraception and abortion.

[King Moonracer]

the plaintiffs are Katrina McCarty, 29, of Somerville, Julia Battel, 37, of Boston, and Dr. Rebekah Gee, 30, of Boston.

First prove you had sex.....with a man!

[martin_fierro]

[Lurker]

Wal-Mart needs to start closing some stores on the East Coast.

L

[traumer]

HEY - let's go and sue WalMart... !!

:o)

[Pan_Yans Wife]

I used to believe that the term "Jane Doe" represented one of the claimants. Now it has become incorporated, Jane Doe, Inc.?

[satchmodog9]

Go shop somewhere else you sea hag.

[martin_fierro]

[eeevil conservative]

where is the law that states EVERY pharmacy must carry ALL possible prescribed medicine? Is that right next to the law that states that ALL medical doctors and facilities MUST perform abortions on demand?

These PEOPLE are EEEVIL and INSANE!......

Can I sue McDonald's for not serving me a beer! I am over 21 and it is MY RIGHT!

[AliVeritas]

First of all, they (the court) should verify by an independent OB/GYN that they're even pregnant... trust me. As we know from Roe and Doe, both cases were based on lies and both planned to have and had their children; One claimed she was raped and wasn't (Roe, Norma), and one was single with three kids and needed the money offered to her by the pro-abortion groups to lie for Doe. Both admitted. BTW, Roe has been part of the Pro Life movement for years.

[LIConFem]

This case is a loser for the plaintiffs; based on nothing but lies and exaggerations.

[SW6906]

I'm going to sue Safeway for failing to stock my favorite beer!

I should be able to force any business to sell what I want them to sell, right?

[usmcobra]

Emergency Contraception?

Now there is a term which defies logic, some women can take hours to get ready for a date planning to the Nth degree everything that will happen, and yet they need "Emergency Contraception" so badly they have to sue Wal Mart of all places to get it?

[sgtbono2002]

The most dangerous place in the world is standing between a knocked up liberal and her morning after pill.

[Vaquero]

sounds like the turkey baster crowd needs to practice safe basting.

[HiTech RedNeck]

At least the pills are not made in China.

[SouthernFreebird]

"Women shouldn't be refused needed medication."

Poison to kill a baby isn't 'needed medication'. These hags can find all the time in the world to harass stores and pharmicists and yet not spend 2 minutes putting on a condom or taking a frikkin pill or slapping on a patch or any of the many other option available to avoid pregnancy.

I think they get off on the control issue, having that god like power of life or death over a baby. Foul Wh***s

[FairfaxVA]

"The women said they knew they would be refused when they went to the Wal-Marts in Quincy and Lynn and that the action was planned with the abortion rights groups and lawyers."

So, these three individuals went to the Wal-Mart knowing full well that the store did not stock the product they wanted, and yet they are telling people that Wal-Mart 'refused' them the pill? That seems like a pretty big difference to me. I could maybe, maybe, understand a comaplint to Wal-Mart corporate requesting/suggesting that they carry the pill, but as soon as I saw that they were seeking 25 million in damages they lost any and all credibility. They suffered no injury by the actions of Wal-Mart, so I am a bit baffled by this whole thing. Can some of you lawyer-types add some insight?

[BigSkyFreeper]

Haven't these women heard of a drugstore? Yeah, yeah, I understand some Wal-Mart's have every department under the sun, but really?

[poncho67]

I was gonna try disecting the law to see if it in fact requires all pharmacies to sell these poison pills, but why bother, the courts up there will figure out a way to read that into whatever the laws say anyway. The Mass legislature also doesn't hestitate to pass whatever overreaching, onerous laws they can think up too, including lots of them trying to outlaw basic laws of economics that invariably create scarcity of whatever product they're trying to regulate. (But, who am I to talk about that, I live in Maryland! BTW, did you see our lovely senator the other night on TV?

[Sloth]

The plaintiffs are Katrina McCarty, 29, of Somerville, Julia Battel, 37, of Boston, and Dr. Rebekah Gee, 30, of Boston. All three were turned away when they tried to buy emergency contraception pills at area Wal-Marts.

The women said they knew they would be refused when they went to the Wal-Marts in Quincy and Lynn and that the action was planned with the abortion rights groups and lawyers.

After being refused, McCarty and Battel went to other pharmacies and got their prescriptions filled. CVS, the state's largest pharmacy chain, stocks the pill at all of its pharmacy locations, as do the state's other major pharmacy chains.

So, can these people get in trouble for obtaining drug prescriptions for improper / non-medical reasons? They are openly admitting this was a planned stunt rather than a genuine need for 'emergency contraception.'