Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming biggest since Viking era
Cox News Service ^ | Friday, February 10, 2006 | MIKE TONER

Posted on 02/12/2006 8:49:59 PM PST by presidio9

The warming of the world during the last century is greater – and more widespread – than any other shift in the global climate in the last 1,200 years, researchers reported Thursday.

The analysis of data from tree rings, fossil shells, ice cores and actual temperature measurements from 14 locations on three continents shows that the current warming trend is the most extensive change — warm or cold — since the time of the Vikings.

In their report in the current issue of the journal Science, climatologists Timothy Osborn and Keith Briffa of the University of East Anglia, home to the leading British climate research center, stop short of blaming the 20th-century warming on industrial emissions or other human factors.

But Osborn and Briffa say the geographic extent of the current warming, whatever the reason, is more widespread and more pronounced than the one that turned Greenland green 1,000 years ago.

Their analyses for tree ring and other climate "proxies" from Europe, Asia and North America do show two other pronounced climate shifts during the same period: the Medieval Warm Period from 890 to 1170 and the Little Ice Age, which gripped the Northern Hemisphere from 1580 to 1850.

The Medieval warming, which encouraged the Vikings to settle previously inhospitable regions of Greenland and Iceland, is sometimes cited by critics of modern global warming theories as evidence that the Earth can experience widespread warming independent of human activity.

"It's good that they acknowledge that the last thousand years contained two warm periods with a cold one in between," says S. Fred Singer, president of the Virginia-based Science Policy Project, which frequently disputes claims of global warming.

"But it still doesn't prove that the 20th century was unique," Singer said.

The Bush administration has acknowledged the widespread warming of recent decades, but has sought further research on the causes.

The administration also has declined to join 140 other nations in signing the Kyoto climate accord, which calls on industrial nations to reduce their industrial emissions.

While the study's emperature measurements only go back to the 1800s, researchers were able to reconstruct the Northern Hemisphere's climate back as far as the ninth century.

Researchers correlated temperature records with 14 long-term climate proxies, ranging from fossil shells in the Chesapeake Bay to tree rings in Mongolia.

"Both individually and taken as a whole, these reconstructions support the conclusion that it is likely that the late 20th century was the warmest period in the past millennium or longer," Osborn says.

Averaged across the globe, the increase in temperatures is numerically small — about one degree above normal and about two degrees warmer than during the late 1800s.

The increase, however, has been especially sharp in recent years, with all 10 of the warmest years on record occurring since the mid-1990s.

The warming has been linked to accelerated melting of mountain glaciers and polar ice sheets throughout the world, warmer sea surface temperatures, the earlier arrival of spring in the Northern Hemisphere and other changes.

Many scientists predict the warming will increase if man-made releases of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are not curbed.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: globalwarmingtheory; godsgravesglyphs; junkscience; longhousegases; vikings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: quantim

Hi Quant,

Actually you're right. Mt. St. Helen's made a mess around the world for quite a time. So did Krakatoa. There are probably more "natural" causes to a lot of pollution.


61 posted on 02/13/2006 4:57:54 AM PST by garyhope (Happy Valentine's fellow Freepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
That's entirely bogus. The last record of the Vikings in Greenland occurred in 1408, although they presumably lasted somewhat longer; perhaps Basque pirates finally annihilated them. But the Little Ice Age was in full swing, taking its toll on European-style animal husbandry as wintertime snowfalls melted later for increasingly fewer pasturage days during the summer. Ice floes usually blocked European fleets from reaching the Greenland settlements, and many (perhaps even most) simply sank and disappeared in the viciously stormy seas.

Greenlanders abandoned the Western Settlement circa the 1350s. The Chinese fleet never reached European shores. Although they *MIGHT* have reached America somewhere, the Chinese could not have circumnavigated Greenland, then an ice-choked island populated solely by Inuit.
62 posted on 02/13/2006 5:17:59 AM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Regarding the bogus bit, may I suggest reading a book titled 1421, authored by Gavin Menzes.


63 posted on 02/13/2006 11:06:55 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sangrila

The book is titled 1421 and the author is Gavin Menves. He has a web site which a quick reference to Google will bring up. The book is most interesting.


64 posted on 02/13/2006 11:09:33 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Based on what I've seen of it, that book consists largely of fanciful speculation. It's a well-established fact that Chinese seafarers reached East Africa and entirely possible that they explored other locations. But the climate record does not support any possible circumnavigation of Greenland in any craft not specially outfitted for icebound polar navigation circa 1421. No evidence exists to suggest that the Chinese possessed such equipment. Even reaching Greenland in those days (without meteorological satellite data or modern telecommunications) would make one quite lucky. Superior Chinese shipbuilding technology, however, probably would allow their fleet to weather some nasty storms, but even the Titanic couldn't survive an iceberg.


65 posted on 02/13/2006 4:38:25 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tomjohn77

I had never heard that they had either. Another poster posted the title of the book that claims they did. It is kind of difficult to believe, but I would be interested in reading about the claims.


66 posted on 02/13/2006 6:01:00 PM PST by sangrila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The Vikings sailed throughout large sections of the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean and while doing so emitted large quantities of flatulence from their ships. During their long journeys beans were a staple of their galleys.

Historians erroneously assert that lands that were visited by Vikings feared the Vikings ferocious violence, looting and raping. This is inaccurate. The Vikings could be smelled coming from several miles away and the victims fled in utter fear of the odor.

It is for this reason apparently that temperatures rose significantly during this period.

Anyone believe this?
67 posted on 02/13/2006 6:15:11 PM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

Maybe cutting down all those trees to make their homes and ships,
then burning down captured towns and chieftain's funeral boats
released all those greenhouse gases...


68 posted on 02/13/2006 6:19:10 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

A Blast from the Past.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

69 posted on 01/01/2007 3:35:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It takes a village to mind its own business. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The analysis of data from tree rings, fossil shells, ice cores and actual temperature measurements from 14 locations on three continents shows that the current warming trend is the most extensive change — warm or cold — since the time of the Vikings.

Well, then, we should all celebrate a return to the famine, death, and despair of the onset of the Little Ice Age over the relative prosperity of the Medivial Warm Period - because who cares about the welfare of serfs when polar bears might just be starving somewhere?

70 posted on 01/01/2007 3:40:37 PM PST by dirtboy (Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Why was it warmer during the Viking era? Was it CO2 from burning villages?


71 posted on 01/01/2007 3:42:33 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Ummmm...except, Greenland still isn't green, at least not yet.

Why is it that we must always point to the obvious when discussing this subject with journalists and "scientists".


72 posted on 01/01/2007 3:43:47 PM PST by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

In any case, what are they saying to the Chinese, who are filling the air with dirty coal smoke? Nada, nada, nada. Fact is that in 1930, the air in New York and other east coast cities was full of soot. That was because they heated with coal. By 1970, after switching to heating oil, they had clean air.


73 posted on 01/01/2007 3:55:52 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I have stated this a few times in the past, and will choose to take the opportunity once again to say - We need to shift into an ice age soon. Either that needs to happen or everyone under 300 ft above CURRENT sea level needs to get the hell out of Dodge before you're land is worthless.

How are your kids going to use the house/land investment that you pass on to them if they have to scuba dive to enjoy it?

Wanna set them up with a lasting inheritance? Figure out the EXACT future Beach front level, buy land up(miles inland and cheap) in Belize or some other similar location, and wait for the ice shelves to melt. Hey, YOU might not get to see it happen, but it'll eventually be worth millions more than that timeshare in Key West, right? AND, your descendants get first dibs on land that won't be covered in a mile thick ice cube, in case the opposite happens to the world's climate and the populace of the Northern Hemisphere both go south.

Hey, WIN-WIN, right?

Remind me again why we're rebuilding ANY PART of New Orleans? Shouldn't we start the large scale relocation of all important cities and buildings on the coastline of the entire world now? I'm kinda thinking it may actually take a little while, but what do I know? Are we going to have to sit by and act like we're all idiots again?

I mean, lets think about this - We're rebuilding a sinking city, AND the ocean level is rising. Wow. Every time I think about that one it boggles my mind. What a tribute to the intelligence of man we are.

I moved 1400 miles to prepare for my descendants future, shouldn't all of you be in the process of doing the same? Or, are you going to act like the idiots in New Orleans and actually try to blame the government and everyone else for your own shortsighted, egocentrical existence? How long do you think the insurance companies and your government can afford to support the groves of stupid people?

If you read this and choose to not move on it, then you have chosen procrastination and will become nothing more than a statistic over time.

It makes me sad to see people warp an intellectual conversation into a barrage of blond jokes and other slow-man's humor, and I'm glad that most of the people on GGG are above the brick-headed mentality of the masses.
74 posted on 01/01/2007 5:41:04 PM PST by DavemeisterP (It's never too late to be what you might have been....George Elliot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson