Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters
1 posted on
03/06/2006 7:12:50 AM PST by
Leofl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: Leofl
144 posted on
03/06/2006 8:04:30 AM PST by
GVnana
(Former Alias: GVgirl)
To: Leofl
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!
146 posted on
03/06/2006 8:05:19 AM PST by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: Leofl
To: Leofl
157 posted on
03/06/2006 8:12:43 AM PST by
MikefromOhio
(22,952+ replies - wow I'm talkative.....)
To: Leofl
Score one for the good guys/gals!
Here's to many more from this iteration of the U.S. Supreme Court.
160 posted on
03/06/2006 8:13:51 AM PST by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
To: Leofl
Does this mean that high schools, including the Portland, Oregon school district, have to stop banning recruiters on campus as well?
To: Leofl
Common sense prevails again. We need a lot more.
170 posted on
03/06/2006 8:21:11 AM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: Leofl
How about, if you allow any employment recruiters on campus, you cannot discriminate against the military?
174 posted on
03/06/2006 8:26:19 AM PST by
LachlanMinnesota
(The real Churchill knew a blood thirsty gutter snipe when he saw one.)
To: Leofl
Don't celebrate just yet. The ALCU has just announced that they will appeal this ruling to the UN.
178 posted on
03/06/2006 8:36:31 AM PST by
StopGlobalWhining
(Only 3 1/2-5% of atmospheric CO2 is the result of human activities. 95-96.5% is from natural sources)
To: Leofl
Excellent news and long overdue.
Yale (along with hundreds of other anti-American universities) must be agonizing over this ruling.
180 posted on
03/06/2006 8:40:14 AM PST by
indcons
(The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Gucho; Coop
Thought you may be interested in this!
Chief Justice Roberts:
"A military recruiter's mere presence on campus does not violate a law school's right to associate, regardless of how repugnant the law school considers the recruiter's message,"
183 posted on
03/06/2006 8:42:16 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: Leofl
I thought this had happened years ago.
How many times must the issue be revisited before the rules are enforced?
185 posted on
03/06/2006 8:43:53 AM PST by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: Leofl
And liberals now get to realize what we small-government conservatives have known for a long time--if you get a handout from the government, there's ALWAYS strings attached. Once you take that money, if you want to keep it, you dance to their tune.
We've known it for decades with things like the Federal government bullying states into raising drinking ages and lowering blood-alcohol contents and mandating seat-belt laws by threatening to withhold highway funds. And now, the liberals get to feel the same pain.
Suck it down, fellas. Suck it down.
}:-)4
186 posted on
03/06/2006 8:45:51 AM PST by
Moose4
("I will shoulder my musket and brandish my sword/In defense of this land and the word of the Lord")
To: Leofl
No doubt....this will be the best part of the BushII legacy.
Thanks Lord.
190 posted on
03/06/2006 8:50:01 AM PST by
wardaddy
("hillbilly car wash owner outta control")
To: Leofl
YAY!! A win for the good guys!
To: Leofl
The law schools say they can't afford to lose $35 billion a year in federal aid? Who says we need to be churning out lawyers at that rate -- especially when the "brightest" of the law school professors couldn't even convince Justice Bader-Ginsburg that they have a "right" to federal cash regardless of their policies toward the federal government?
To: Leofl
Oh It's gonna be a smelly day everywhere in Liberal land today!
WOOT! Thank you Mr. President!
195 posted on
03/06/2006 8:56:50 AM PST by
Danae
(Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: Leofl
Yesssss!
God Bless our brave Troops!
And may they recruit and multiply.
Cheers - Dinah
196 posted on
03/06/2006 8:58:31 AM PST by
Dinah Lord
(fighting the Islamic jihad one keystroke and one prayer at a time...)
To: Leofl
There is a conservative, states' rights argument on the school's side, but I don't know if that's the argument they used. The schools could argue that the federal government only has a right to specify how federal funds are used, but not to link acceptance of that money to other areas that are none of the Feds business. The schools could argue that the anti-recruitment ban is a state's decision, on a matter unrelated to acceptance of federal funds, that the feds have no authority to override.
To: Leofl
WOOHOO!!!!
In your face, Liberal Academe Pond Scum!!!!
Jack.
202 posted on
03/06/2006 9:15:08 AM PST by
Jack Deth
(Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-129 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson