Good for her, but as Malkin asks - where's Bush on this?
To: the anti-liberal
Bush issued a statement and had Condi call Karzai.
2 posted on
03/23/2006 2:07:25 PM PST by
nuffsenuff
(Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
To: the anti-liberal
If they do execute this guy, we should immediately withdraw our troops.
3 posted on
03/23/2006 2:07:42 PM PST by
linear
(America suffers neither from conservatism nor liberalism, but from a failure of her institutions.)
To: the anti-liberal
Thank heavens someone bitch-slapped McCormack from the State Department. His behavior was disgusting during his briefing the other day.
4 posted on
03/23/2006 2:07:58 PM PST by
zerosix
(Native Conservative Sunflower)
To: the anti-liberal
What did she call him? I've a few choice words in mind.
5 posted on
03/23/2006 2:09:10 PM PST by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: the anti-liberal; triver; Braak; eazdzit; Stellar Dendrite; George - the Other; PROSOUTH; ...
Malkin ping!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Michelle Malkin ping list...
9 posted on
03/23/2006 2:16:05 PM PST by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: the anti-liberal
Karzai will somehow manage to intervene with the courts and get Rahman declared incompetent to stand trial. He'll be released and his headless body will be found a week later. International crisis averted, and islam continues to have its way.
To: the anti-liberal
Classic technique.
Hostage negotiations, buying a car, etc. Never commit the highest authority to an absolute position. You've got nowhere to go if they tell you to take a leap. If Karzai tells Secretary Rice there's nothing he can do, she invokes the diplomatic equivalent of "I'll tell Dad."
14 posted on
03/23/2006 2:21:07 PM PST by
Wimpy329
(Does that seem right to you? - Jubal Early)
To: the anti-liberal
Ms. Rice also told Afghanistan's Foreign Minister, Abdullah Abdullah, in a 15-minute meeting in Washington today that she was deeply troubled by the case It so troubled Rice
that she called him twice...
17 posted on
03/23/2006 2:23:25 PM PST by
mikrofon
(Release Rahman!)
To: the anti-liberal
"Good for her, but as Malkin asks - where's Bush on this?"
Uh, having his Secretary of State make the call. That's her job. If you're implying that Bush should make the call for public relations purposes you're probably right. So many people are impressed by appearances, if Bush had rolled his sleeves up and pretended to help the National guard during Katrina he may have saved his poll numbers--not that anyone would actually have been helped. Clinton instinctively know when to get in front of the cameras and when to hide--and that's all he did. Bush appears to just want to do his job and have his cabinet do theirs. Just my 2 cents.
To: the anti-liberal
I'm getting more than a little sick of everyone suggesting they know what Bush should do, when he should do ... let THEM run for office.
He could spend his whole presidency like his predecessor and fell everyone's pain, leaving the door wide open for another 9-11, but, ah, the intervening PR and polls would be great !
28 posted on
03/23/2006 3:22:32 PM PST by
EDINVA
To: the anti-liberal
..things seen and said in public are often very different from what goes on in back-channel conversation--I'm sure GWB is leaning VERY hard on Karzai...
34 posted on
03/23/2006 3:51:25 PM PST by
WalterSkinner
( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
To: the anti-liberal
When someone elects Michelle president, she can make all the phone calls, from ordering presidential staplers to threatening thermonuclear war. President Bush can delegate as he chooses.
To: the anti-liberal
Am not too happy about Condi's statement re the 'death' of Saddam's in-law; former 'Master of the Wood Chipper':
"We were disappointed there was not greater dignity given to the accused under these circumstances," Rice said during a news conference with her Egyptian counterpart.
The accused? Death with dignity for the man who put Iraquis into a wood-chipper; feet first?
'Condi. . .where are you?'
Perhap's she was preparing her message to karzai. . .
47 posted on
01/15/2007 5:30:22 PM PST by
cricket
(Save a Terrorist - join the Democrats/Live Liberal Free; or suffer their consequences)
To: the anti-liberal
Ms. Rice said that the United States fought for those values in Afghanistan, and that the case was contrary to the Afghan constitution, Mr. McCormack said. It is a Muslim problem Condi and not for us Infidels to decide. - Tom
Article 1 [Islamic Republic] Afghanistan is an Islamic Republic, independent, unitary and indivisible state.
Article 2 [Religions] (1) The religion of the state of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is the sacred religion of Islam.
(2) Followers of other religions are free to exercise their faith and perform their religious rites within the limits of the provisions of law,.
Article 3 [Law and Religion] In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.
49 posted on
01/18/2007 1:52:23 PM PST by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson