Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to Contract Foreign Co. to Scan Cargo
AP/Yahoo ^ | March 24, 2006 | Ted Bridis and John Solomon

Posted on 03/24/2006 10:05:31 AM PST by Baby Bear

U.S. to Contract Hong Kong Firm to Help Scan for Nuclear Materials Passing From Bahamas to U.S.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- One of Americans' favorite beach destinations, the Bahamas, is getting a new U.S. arrival -- sophisticated equipment to detect radioactive materials in shipping cargo. But U.S. customs agents won't be on site to supervise the machine's use as a nuclear safeguard for the American shoreline that is just 65 miles away from Freeport. Under an unusual arrangement, a Hong Kong company will help operate the detector.

The Bush administration says it is finalizing a no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. It acknowledged the deal is the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.

The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.

While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.

Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

"Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues. But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman."

"One can conceive legitimate security concerns and would hope either the Homeland Security Department or the intelligence services of the United States work very hard to satisfy those concerns," Wortzel said.

Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., on national security grounds.

And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.

Hutchison's port operations in the Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC (People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other prohibited items into the Americas," the now-declassified assessment said.

The CIA currently has no security concerns about Hutchison's port operations, and the Bush administration believes the pending deal with the foreign company would be safe, officials said.

Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner that moves slowly over large cargo containers and scans them for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.

Any positive reading would set off alarms monitored simultaneously by Bahamian customs inspectors at Freeport and by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials working at an anti-terrorism center 800 miles away in northern Virginia. Any alarm would prompt a closer inspection of the cargo, and there are multiple layers of security to prevent tampering, officials said.

"The equipment operates itself," said Bryan Wilkes, a spokesman for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency negotiating the contract. "It's not going to be someone standing at the controls pressing buttons and flipping switches."

Hutchison's ports subsidiary said in a statement Friday from its headquarters in Hong Kong it was confident that Bahamian customs inspectors will notify U.S. authorities whenever it is appropriate.

The administration is finalizing the contract amid a national debate over maritime security sparked by the furor over now-abandoned plans by Dubai-owned DP World to take over significant operations at major U.S. ports.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, the senior Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, said President Bush "needs to explain what safeguards are in place at foreign ports to assure that operators are not jeopardizing our security."

"If a port operator has been identified as posing a potential threat to national security, it is only common sense that Americans should be working on site to assure U.S. security is taken seriously," Thompson said. "If the president needs more U.S. Customs inspectors to get the job done, I'd be happy to lead the charge to get however many is needed to keep America safe."

Some security experts questioned whether the U.S. should pay a foreign company with ties to China to keep radioactive material out of the United States.

"Giving a no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

A low-paid employee with access to the screening equipment could frustrate international security by studying how the equipment works and which materials set off its alarms, warned a retired U.S. Customs investigator who specialized in smuggling cases.

"Money buys a lot of things," Robert Sheridan said. "The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers -- all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."

The Hutchison deal in the Bahamas was flagged in a report in October by ATS Worldwide Services, a Florida firm that identifies potential risks for private-sector and government clients. Company officials said they shared the report with some officials in Congress, the military and law enforcement.

Other experts discounted concerns. They cited Hutchison's reputation as a leading ports company and said the United States inevitably must rely for some security on large commercial operators in the global maritime industry.

"We must not allow an unwarranted fear of foreign ownership or involvement in offshore operations to impair our ability to protect against nuclear weapons being smuggled into this country," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. "We must work with these foreign companies."

A former Coast Guard commander, Stephen Flynn, said foreign companies sometimes prove more trustworthy -- and susceptible to U.S. influence -- than governments.

"It's a very fragile system," Flynn said. Foreign companies "recognize the U.S. has the capacity and willingness to exercise a kill switch if something goes wrong."

There are no U.S. customs agents checking any cargo containers at the Hutchison port in Freeport. Under the contract, no U.S. officials would be stationed permanently in the Bahamas with the radiation scanner.

Hutchison operates the sprawling Freeport Container Port on Grand Bahama Island. Its subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings, has operations in more than 20 countries but none in the United States.

Contract documents obtained by AP indicate Hutchison will be paid roughly $6 million. The contract is for one year with options for three years.

The National Nuclear Security Administration, which is an Energy Department agency tasked with strengthening nuclear security worldwide, is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.

"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."

Some security experts said that is a weak explanation in the Bahamas, with its close reliance on the United States. The administration could insist that the Bahamas permit U.S. Customs agents to operate at the port, said Albert Santoli, an expert on national security issues in Asia and the Pacific.

"Why would they not accept that?" said Santoli, a former national security aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. "There is an interest in the Bahamas and every other country in the region to make sure the U.S. stays safe and strong. That's how this should be negotiated."

Associated Press writers Bill Foreman in Hong Kong and Jim Gomez in Manila contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; china; doasearchwillya; duplicate; hongkong; hutchisonwhampoa; nobidcontract; nocustomsagents; nuclear; nuke; scan; search; seenit; thebahamas; threepeat
I cannot believe no one report this travesty yet. Wake up folks!
1 posted on 03/24/2006 10:05:34 AM PST by Baby Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear
I cannot believe no one report this travesty yet. Wake up folks!

Wake up yourself. It's already been reported.

Several times.

2 posted on 03/24/2006 10:07:47 AM PST by TomServo ("It's a cameo appearance by Donald the Demon Bird!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear
U.S. to Contract Foreign Co. to Scan Cargo ^
  Posted by Baby Bear
On News/Activism ^ 03/24/2006 12:05:31 PM CST · 3+ views


AP/Yahoo ^ | March 24, 2006 | Ted Bridis and John Solomon
U.S. to Contract Hong Kong Firm to Help Scan for Nuclear Materials Passing From Bahamas to U.S.WASHINGTON (AP) -- One of Americans' favorite beach destinations, the Bahamas, is getting a new U.S. arrival -- sophisticated equipment to detect radioactive materials in shipping cargo. But U.S. customs agents won't be on site to supervise the machine's use as a nuclear safeguard for the American shoreline that is just 65 miles away from Freeport. Under an unusual arrangement, a Hong Kong company will help operate the detector. The Bush administration says it is finalizing a no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. It...
 

U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. to Scan Nukes ^
  Posted by AnimalLover
On News/Activism ^ 03/24/2006 3:52:26 AM CST · 44 replies · 471+ views


My Way News ^ | Mar 23, 8:32 PM (ET) | TED BRIDIS and JOHN SOLOMON
In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere. The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present. Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again. The contract is currently being finalized.
 

U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. To Scan Nukes ^
  Posted by My Favorite Headache
On News/Activism ^ 03/23/2006 4:49:54 PM CST · 116 replies · 2,224+ views


AP ^ | 3-23-06 | TED BRIDIS
U.S. Hiring Chinese Co. to Scan Nukes By TED BRIDIS and JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writers 27 minutes ago WASHINGTON - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere. ADVERTISEMENT The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present. Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from...

3 posted on 03/24/2006 10:08:10 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

BTW, if I had a nuke 65 miles away, I wouldn't take the chance to load it in a cargo hold, I'd take a private sailboat.


4 posted on 03/24/2006 10:10:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

Same Hutchinson that we refused to allow to operate thje Port of Long Beach.

Most notably because they are a front for the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army!

So what this actually does is give the scanner and operations to the Chinese Army. Do we really want to give them this!

Time to make some phone calls folks.


5 posted on 03/24/2006 10:10:58 AM PST by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear
Administration policy on foreign natnl. security issues:

Dubai=Double Plus good.

China=Double Double Plus Good

Israel(sourcefire)= Bad

6 posted on 03/24/2006 10:14:17 AM PST by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I am sorry--the search engine failed me.
7 posted on 03/24/2006 10:15:46 AM PST by Baby Bear (Conserve and grow your money...gain personal freedom in return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

Let's talk about COSCO and the Saudi Shipping company first Chuckie Schumer


8 posted on 03/24/2006 10:17:35 AM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative

They also own Husky Oil in Canada.


9 posted on 03/24/2006 10:17:59 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear
There seems to be something going on at FR regarding this news story in the last 24 hours. When it was first posted the title said "Chinese", later it said "Hong Kong", now "Foreign" -- so folks scan, don't find it, post it, then it's deleted as a duplicate.

Someone on another thread commented that they just tried to post a Newsmax article about the subject and they commented that the Newsmax article was pulled as a dup also.
10 posted on 03/24/2006 10:20:42 AM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo

Some one at Homeland Security has fallen asleep at the switch again. Just how treasonous is Chertoff and his gang of merry pirates? These assholes have no intentions of stopping until one of our cities goes up in flames.


11 posted on 03/24/2006 10:23:58 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
We're going to wake up someday and discover that Chinese companies own the MSM.

What will we believe then about the veracity of the news of the news that's presented, and how will we be able to discern the truth?

We can't even do a half-way decent job now.

12 posted on 03/24/2006 10:26:05 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo; Baby Bear

Here is the Newsmax article.... excerpted

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/3/23/173950.shtml?s=lh
U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Firm to Check Cargo for Nukes
NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, March 24, 2006


U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Firm to Scan Nukes


WASHINGTON -- In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.


The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.


Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again. The contract is currently being finalized.


The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.


While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.


Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.


Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., on national security grounds.


And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.


excerpted


13 posted on 03/24/2006 10:31:31 AM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

It seems that almost anything that has to do with container/cargo shipping, is done by foreign companies. Does anyone know what it is about trans-ocean shipping and cargo handling, that keeps US companies from even wanting to be in that business?


14 posted on 03/24/2006 10:32:13 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mini-14
So is the article in 13 the Newsmax article that got pulled.

I wonder why it was pulled. It does NOT seem to be a duplicate.
15 posted on 03/24/2006 10:36:08 AM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

Seems to be the only thing is that Hutchinson will now operate the scanning machine. By the sounds of the article they already handle the port of Freeport or at least run the international shipping terminals regardless of what we sign with them. So if they're not going to run the scanner who is? What we need to do is get Jamaica to sign the Container Security initiative, that would allow the customs officials to be there (you know the thing that the only countries in the middle east have signed, Oman and DUBAI!) in . Until then they cannot be there without permission from Jamaica. So we really have not choice unless we just don't want to have cargo in Jamaica checked.


16 posted on 03/24/2006 10:36:37 AM PST by mykpfsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

what a bunch of B.S.


17 posted on 03/24/2006 10:40:15 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baby Bear

Posted three time at least. If you would read the other postings you will find that the bahamian government controls who and what runs their ports... not the US. We should stop using their ports. Problem solved.

LLS


18 posted on 03/24/2006 10:41:07 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykpfsu
By the sounds of the article they already handle the port of Freeport or at least run the international shipping terminals regardless of what we sign with them.

I checked it last night. Goggle up the port. They own not lease 50% of the port.

19 posted on 03/24/2006 11:43:22 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ozoneliar

That about sums it up.


20 posted on 03/24/2006 6:27:56 PM PST by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson