Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Australian) Elite girls' school 'kills the study of literature' (Shakespeare goes Marxist)
The Australian ^ | April 15, 2006 | Justine Ferrari

Posted on 04/14/2006 2:47:18 PM PDT by CheyennePress

ONE of the world's leading authorities on Shakespeare's work, Harold Bloom, and the nation's pre-eminent poet, Les Murray, have declared literary study in Australia dead after learning that a prestigious Sydney school asked students to interpret Othello from Marxist, feminist and racial perspectives.

"I find the question sublimely stupid," Professor Bloom, an internationally renowned literary critic, the Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale and Berg Professor of English at New York University, said yesterday.

"It is another indication that literary study has died in Australia."

The question was an assessment task in March set for advanced English students in Year 11 at SCEGGS Darlinghurst, an independent Anglican girls' school in inner Sydney. Considered one of the nation's leading schools, it charges almost $20,000 a year in fees for senior students.

The assessment task asked students to write an essay explaining how Othello supported different readings.

"In your answer, refer closely to the prescribed text and explain how dramatic techniques might be used to communicate each reading. You must consider two of the following readings: Marxist, feminist, race," the question says.

Bloom is a renowned defender of the Romantic poets and a critic of Marxist and post-modern approaches to literary criticism, among others. His 1994 work, The Western Canon, attacked the rise of ideologically based criticism.

Murray, who has just published his latest volume of poetry, The Biplane Houses, described the question as horrifying and said Australian literary study was "worse than dead".

He said literature should be removed from school curriculums, which, in the words of US poet Billy Collins, teach students to strap poetry to a chair and beat meaning out of it with a hose.

"Students are being taught to translate (poetry and literature) into some kind of dreary, rebarbative, reductive prose for the purpose of getting high marks," Murray said.

"They're being taught to overcome it, not to appreciate it, not to value it, not to be changed or challenged by it but to get mastery over it."

But SCEGGS head Jenny Allum defended the question, arguing that it asked students to show their understanding of Othello's themes.

"It's phrased in a slightly different way ... but it's about the role of women, the role of black men in that society, the role of the worker, which I think are clear themes of Othello," she said.

Ms Allum, also chairwoman of the academic committee of the Association of Heads of Independent Schools of Australia in NSW, said it was a legitimate way of interpreting Shakespeare's themes using a modern-day understanding of feminism, race relations or Marxism. "There's always been different ways of looking at a play and drawing different meanings," she said.

SCEGGS head of English, Jennifer Levitus, said terms such as Marxism and feminism were modern labels used to help simplify the universal themes found in Shakespeare.

The president of the English Teachers Association of NSW, Mark Howie, said the assessment question was in keeping with the syllabus - that students develop a personal understanding of the text and can relate to the notion that it can be interpreted differently in different contexts.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: australia; canon; education; learning; leftwingnuts; literature; marxism; postmodernism; schools; shakespeare; teaching; westerncanon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: RepoGirl
I cut my own throat in class one day by stating that I felt ideological critiques of literary works were nothing more than intellectual masturbation.

I think that any critiques of literary works are intellectual masturbation. Just READ the damn stuff. If it speaks to you, then great. If it doesn't, find something that does.

I just think that too many literary critics are trying to cover up their own creative constipation

41 posted on 04/18/2006 12:16:37 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

They left out sexual preference????

Shameful. /sarcasm


42 posted on 04/18/2006 12:23:40 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Ever heard of Lysenkoism?

Nope, sure haven't.

43 posted on 04/18/2006 12:36:18 PM PDT by RepoGirl ("That boy just ain't right..." Hank Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I just think that too many literary critics are trying to cover up their own creative constipation

Amen! My writing mentor use to remind us, "Those who can, do. Those who can't, become critics."

Look at Roger "fatboy" Ebert. His one and only screenplay was Valley of the Dolls (come to think of it, he might have also written Pirahna...) Fine films, indeed.

44 posted on 04/18/2006 12:43:00 PM PDT by RepoGirl ("That boy just ain't right..." Hank Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl
You can read a bit about it here. Basically, Lysenko was a quack who rejected genetics WRT crop yields. He was also the darling of Lenin and Stalin, and thus had the power to purge any dissenting theories.
45 posted on 04/18/2006 1:22:09 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
OK first off I am a SCEGGS student and the exam question within the article was the one that was proposed to me during the Year 11 term 1 exam last year.

At the very beginning of the course i to felt that it was stupid to get us to write a paragraph on how a feminist, Marxist and race reading is supported in the text but as we meaning the class went through the text it became clear on how the teachers were wanting us to respond to the Question.

The fact that the readings were developed more recently than when the plays were written IS NOT what was the mean to be the point of the exercise. The point of analyzing the play using these reading was to BROADEN our own understanding of the text and how different view points can change how the reader responds to the play.

For Example:
A FEMINIST reading may may write a negative response to the play because of the underlying nature of the man being superior to the females in the play, and many other ways that can be disputed.
A RACE reading of the play could be on how the nature of the moor Othello, having to constantly prove himself even after showing himself to be a capable leader while Cassio achieved his position due to family and being a white man.

Many different readings can be used to examine the text. When we were studying Othello there were other readings that were used including Social-Political reading.
46 posted on 04/20/2006 5:39:40 AM PDT by SWilliams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beef

Your opinion is exactly the same as my dad's and (admittedly probably just to spite him), I have never agreed with this train of thought. Literary analysis is SO important...and fiction, similarly, should be taken seriously. Yes, novels contain elements of the author's imagination but large segments of the novel develop from more serious issues in our world at large. Consider authors in opressed countries. They cannot write bland, non-fiction novels about the suffering or restrictions that their government or state leader imposes; their book would almost certainly not be published. A fiction book, however, a little more subtle, can allow these authors to express their views and opinions on the matter...and, I might add, give us fantastic insights into how people are living in the circumstances, through character developments, etc...and when it comes to Shakespeare, which is, I believe, where this forum initiated...it does not matter that Shakespeare lived before Marxism..one of the fantastic things about Shakespeare is that his work transcends time and culture barriers...sure, his plays may not have people being lined up on a wall and shot, but the same moral and ethical foundations are in his works, and from these we can further understand the nature of humans and their evils, which has never changed.


47 posted on 04/20/2006 7:15:38 PM PDT by Artemis123 (Artemis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Marxism is a theory of History so you can apply it to any point in human history.


48 posted on 06/19/2006 8:43:27 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: beef

Fiction affects the way people see the world. Shakespeare virtually invented modern English and the idea of the human personality as an ever changing thing. You don't think something like Uncle Tom's Cabin or 1984 had an effect on history?


49 posted on 06/19/2006 8:46:15 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl
"Those who can, do. Those who can't, become critics."

Against that here's Henry James' idea that 'Critical Perceptiveness is a rarer gift then writing fiction.' Criticism is an Artform as well.
50 posted on 06/19/2006 8:49:02 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
ONE of the world's leading authorities on Shakespeare's work, Harold Bloom, and the nation's pre-eminent poet, Les Murray, have declared literary study in Australia dead after learning that a prestigious Sydney school asked students to interpret Othello from Marxist, feminist and racial perspectives.

See, this kind of mush-headed drivel is exactly why I am not a college English teacher. I couldn't spout this crap with a straight face.

When we were in grad school, a friend of mine and I fantasized about a Deconstruction Paper Generator that would spit out gibberish like this, so we wouldn't have to waste time "thinking" it up.
51 posted on 06/19/2006 8:51:03 AM PDT by Xenalyte (The wages of sin are death, but after taxes are taken out it's just sort of a tired feeling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Bloom was held in great disdain when I was at the University of Houston.

But then, the freaks I went to school with thought Derrida, Foucault, and Irigaray were the last word in lit crit.


52 posted on 06/19/2006 8:52:42 AM PDT by Xenalyte (The wages of sin are death, but after taxes are taken out it's just sort of a tired feeling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Well, I'm not going to argue with a master like Henry James. I was one of the few who defended him back 'in the day'.

The thing is--Henry James is a phenomenal writer as well, so any criticism from him has merit. Your average New York Times hack, or academic 'shining star' is a failed literary writer (and yes, I'm aware of the glaringly broad statement that is, but them's my story, and I'm a-stickin' to it.)

And I always maintain, it's easier to critique and deconstruct than it is to create. Look at Roger Ebert.

53 posted on 06/19/2006 8:59:40 AM PDT by RepoGirl ("Bobby, if you weren't my son... I'd hug you...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl
Criticism is creation. Not all writing has to be fiction. Oscar Wilde was another who thought that criticism was an Art. The idea that you have to also do something to write about it is a fallacy. A great historian doesn't have to have first hand experience at what he's documenting to be a great historian.
54 posted on 06/19/2006 9:07:33 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont's Fashionable Nonsense criticizes Irigaray, as a general example of what the believe is the anti-scientific tendency of "postmodernism".

They cite her analyses of E=mc² as a "sexed equation" (because it privileges the speed of light) and her argument that fluid mechanics has been neglected by "masculine" science that prefers to deal with "masculine" rigid objects rather than "feminine" fluids

55 posted on 06/19/2006 9:38:04 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Fiction affects the way people see the world.

No kidding.   People clamor to be emotionally manipulated by made up stories.


You don't think something like Uncle Tom's Cabin or 1984 had an effect on history?

Of course it did, and that IMHO is a real  problem. 

56 posted on 06/19/2006 1:30:09 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: beef

Fiction doesn't always just work on the emotions. It can work on the intellect as well. Opinions can often be expressed with more nuance and detail when expressed metaphorically.


57 posted on 06/19/2006 1:45:41 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Opinions can often be expressed with more nuance and detail when expressed metaphorically.

 

 If everyone understood it that way, then there would not be a problem.
 

58 posted on 06/19/2006 2:46:26 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: beef

What other form of understanding fiction is there?


59 posted on 06/19/2006 2:49:11 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl

You won't catch too many males making this assertion is my guess, but Isabel Archer in Portrait of a Lady may be the most interesting character that I've come across in literature. James is phenomenal. I actually made a pilgrimmage of sorts to Lamb House in Rye, England, to see his house. On one hand, I was very enthusiastic to see children going from door to door and caroling. It fit the cobbled streets perfectly (and Rye is a beautiful little town). Sad thing is that none of them knew who Henry James was. To be fair, the oldest was only about 12 or so, but I'm willing to bet James is the most famous person to have lived in that town.


60 posted on 06/19/2006 4:11:33 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson