Skip to comments.
Pilot trapped in F-22 cockpit after canopy failure
F-16.net ^
| April 25, 2006
| Jeff Hollenbeck
Posted on 04/25/2006 4:14:09 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
"shoot and shatter" After seeing the pics of that "glass" I don't think I'd volunteer to be the first one to shoot at it from the inside... I don't think it would be fun. :-)
21
posted on
04/25/2006 4:30:39 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
an average cost of $159 million per plane, making it the most expensive fighter aircraft in history
http://www.cdi.org/issues/aviation/F22.html
ejection is not an option except in case of severe distress. new flight suits and seats are cheap by comparison.
To: Axhandle
"Replacement cost of the canopy will be $182,205."
Shouldn't cost the Air Force a dime. It's should still be under a 3 year 100,000 mile warranty.
23
posted on
04/25/2006 4:48:11 PM PDT
by
ol painless
(ol' painless is out of the bag)
To: Loud Mime
It is made by Lockheed Martin.
24
posted on
04/25/2006 4:48:19 PM PDT
by
gafusa
To: Ramius
After seeing the pics of that "glass" I don't think I'd volunteer to be the first one to shoot at it from the inside... I don't think it would be fun. :-)I've seen a couple in production, and I agree with your statement.
25
posted on
04/25/2006 4:51:17 PM PDT
by
EricT.
(CA conservatives only serve to inflate the number of electoral votes won by the Dems.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It sounds like a defect. Time for a recall and free replacement!
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
F-22 Fighter Plane
...159 MILLION dollars
Cost to train the F-22 Pilot
...8 MILLION dollars
<
Cost of an in flight fill-up...20 THOUSAND dollars.
Not able to get the danged canopy open...PRICELESS!!
OUCH!!!
And over 182 THOUSAND dollars later!!!
Gosh I would have hated this. I have been in for 16+ years now and haven't had near the misfortune as this pilot did! God bless the guy!
27
posted on
04/25/2006 5:05:56 PM PDT
by
ICE-FLYER
(God bless and keep the United States of America)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Usually the canopy can be blown off the airplane.
28
posted on
04/25/2006 5:09:18 PM PDT
by
JoeGar
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"Replacement cost of the canopy will be $182,205."
Got away cheap.
29
posted on
04/25/2006 5:11:18 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
To: ICE-FLYER
What is that 2" thick? Someone somewhere is going to get their butt kicked.
30
posted on
04/25/2006 5:13:08 PM PDT
by
steveo
(Fathers Against Rude Television: You may already be a member)
To: raygun; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...
31
posted on
04/25/2006 5:17:49 PM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(It is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how the war began.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
$182,000 for the canopy. Is there anything on this plane that hasn't been gold-plated by the generals? They're only ordering a hundred or so of these things. So the development of every part, and every mold, etc. has to be amortized across a puny small number. Therefore it costs a bunch.
Also, we hide secret stuff in contracts like this. That's how we supposedly built the "BlackStar", by hiding money in an earlier canceled Navy fighter contract.
32
posted on
04/25/2006 5:36:53 PM PDT
by
narby
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The F-16's canopy costs about $30,000. When I was at Luke AFB and the very first F-15 squadron, the jack pads for the airplane were identical to F-4 jack pads, but the cost was at least 10X, maybe 20X. We were warned *not* to use F-4 jack pads, whatever the cost.
New stuff costs more than old stuff. Always has, always will. That's the military procurement way.
When the F-22 is 30 years old, canopies will cost $16k in 2006 dollars too.
33
posted on
04/25/2006 5:41:37 PM PDT
by
narby
To: JoeGar
Usually the canopy can be blown off the airplane.
Yes it can, but that is an extreme measure, reserved for true emergencies. When you blow the canopy, there's the potential for even more damage if the canopy hits the aircraft on the way down.
Same goes for ejection. When those rockets fire under the seat, they do tremendous damage to the inside of the cockpit.
34
posted on
04/25/2006 5:47:21 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts!!)
To: ICE-FLYER
And we can't even get a good American built chainsaw anymore.
35
posted on
04/25/2006 5:57:15 PM PDT
by
U S Army EOD
(LINCOLN COUNTY RED DEVILS STATE CHAMPIONS)
To: TankerKC
When I was in the Navy, the canopy of one of our birds was damaged during inflight refueling.
Instead of just pulling it off and replacing it, they strapped one of our fully equipped pilot into the seat, and timed to see how long it would take him to exit the aircraft using his survival knife.
It was pretty cool. When they pressed the go buttton on the stopwatch, he pulled the knife out, and with both hands, jammed it up through the plexiglass canopy. He then poked, sawed and smashed until he was able to climb out. I forget how long it took.
We did take major precautions, though, to ensure none of the canopy became FOD in the cockpit...
36
posted on
04/25/2006 5:59:28 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: ICE-FLYER
Boy...does that pilot look PISSED or WHAT!
37
posted on
04/25/2006 6:01:34 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
$182,000 for the canopy$170k of that goes to the personnel who fill out government paperwork
38
posted on
04/25/2006 6:03:49 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: ICE-FLYER
That will be a rather substantial "payroll deduction".
:-)
39
posted on
04/25/2006 6:10:41 PM PDT
by
mcshot
(I'm not rich and I care.)
To: mcshot; All
Is it just me or do others find themselves wondering why the fire department was extracting him instead of military personell????
Something doesn't fit imho
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson