Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reports Stating Rush Limbaugh Was Arrested Are Inaccurate; Press Conference at 8:00 pm
Yahoo! NEWS ^ | April 28, 2006 | Source: Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/28/2006 5:32:16 PM PDT by RonDog

This just in, from Yahoo! NEWS:

Press Release Source: Rush Limbaugh

Reports Stating Rush Limbaugh Was Arrested Are Inaccurate; Limbaugh's Attorney Holds Press Conference at 8:00 pm Tonight
Friday April 28, 7:55 pm ET

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla., April 28 /PRNewswire/ -- A spokesman for Rush Limbaugh said some news reports that state Mr. Limbaugh was arrested are inaccurate.

Separately, Rush Limbaugh's attorney, Roy Black will hold a press conference at 8:00 pm this evening at the Marriott Hotel at 1001 Okeechobbee Road in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Mr. Black will discuss the agreement reached today with the State Attorney's Office whereby a single count charge of doctor shopping that was filed today by the State Attorney will be dismissed in 18 months.

As previously announced, a primary condition of the dismissal, Mr. Limbaugh must continue to seek treatment from the doctor he has seen for the past two and one half years. This is the same doctor under whose care Mr. Limbaugh has remained free of his addiction without relapse.

Mr. Black stated, "Mr. Limbaugh and I have maintained from the start that there was no doctor shopping, and we continue to hold this position. Accordingly, we filed today with the Court a plea of 'Not Guilty' to the charge filed by the State.

"As part of this agreement, Mr. Limbaugh also has agreed to make a $30,000 payment to the State of Florida to defray the public cost of the investigation. The agreement also provides that he must refrain from violating the law during the 18 month period, must pay $30 per month for the cost of "supervision" and comply with other similar provisions of the agreement.

"Mr. Limbaugh had intended to remain in treatment. Thus, we believe the outcome for him personally will be much as if he had fought the charge and won," he said.

    Contacts:  Sitrick And Company
              (310) 788-2850
              (212) 573-6100
              Mike Sitrick
              Tony Knight
              Tammy Taylor
              Anne George


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; activistcourts; bullzogby; donutwatch; drivebymedia; fakebutaccurate; fishingexpedition; floriduh; getrush; goebbelswouldbeproud; judicialtyranny; limbaugh; lyingliars; makingitup; notguilty; partisanwitchhunt; ratatatatatatmedia; royblack; rush; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh; smearcampaign; talkradio; thebiglie; witchhunt; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-334 next last
To: RonDog

Priceless. Rush getting to nail the media on this Monday goes a long way at making up for his ordeal.


161 posted on 04/28/2006 7:42:53 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

Priceless. Rush getting to nail the media on this Monday goes a long way at making up for his ordeal.


162 posted on 04/28/2006 7:42:58 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
"I don't believe it is against the law to be addicted to something, is it?"

I don't recall that I said it was. Hence my question what would the Bush's pardon him from?

Addiction is a terrible thing though and ruins lives. Hence any means to get a person to get help is a good thing. IMO

163 posted on 04/28/2006 7:43:38 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

Same old crap. Media people reporting what they wish were true.


164 posted on 04/28/2006 7:44:27 PM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
After 18 months, "He will not have any criminal record," Black said...

What that means is that he can move to expunge his criminal record in 18 months. That may be meaningful to those not in the public eye, who could effectively purge any permanent arrest record and then successfully (and legally) deny ever having been arrested, but here, the fact of the arrest is permanently public. So it can never be truly expunged.

Me, I could care if Rush spends his time popping hillbilly heroin like shelled pistachios, as long as he stays put while doing it and isn't climbing in his car and running over my kids.

Unfortunately, his hypocrisy smells to high heaven. He would have been (and often was) the first to decry such a libertarian position on drugs.

Frankly, any negative fallout he gets on this is well-deserved. Maybe now he'll really see the light on what it means to get the government off your back.

165 posted on 04/28/2006 7:44:57 PM PDT by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins
Your statement is completely illogical. By "presenting for booking," one is putting one's self in the custody of the state. He then bonded out (after being printed and having a mugshot taken).

Don't kid yourself -- he was arrested, and he's copping a plea.

166 posted on 04/28/2006 7:49:03 PM PDT by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
This thing is over.

Payed bail... huh. For what? Government administration fees? The DA's next Christmas party?. There's no flight risk here, not that Rush [LOL!] would run because there will be no trial.

The dumbass prosecutor should be prosecuted for malfeasance.

167 posted on 04/28/2006 7:49:41 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins
Nope...sorry. An "arrest" is the process by which a person is taken into physical care and custody of the state, for whatever purpose. It is possible to present for booking, and to post bond (assurance to appear at some future time and place), without having been formally "arrested."

You can think what you like. I worked for a criminal defense attorney and worked with the police and the District Attorney's Office and have great familiarity with criminal law. On this particular matter, however, prior to posting, I read the statements call a friend who is a sheriff and read them to him. According to this police officer, if what the statements in this article state are factual and true, Rush was arrested.

I have been informed years ago that any time someone has had a warrant issued, had a mugshot taken, fingerprints taken, and/or bond set, they are arrested, regardless if voluntarily appearing at the police station after the warrant is issued and regardless if placed in jail.

I personally know many people who have been "arrested" after voluntarily going to the police station and, aside from the charge, everything was EXACTLY THE SAME AS WHAT HAPPENED WITH RUSH: booked, fingerprints, mugshot, and let go on their own recognizance. They were "arrested" and the judge later issued an order that would dismiss the charge on an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD).

168 posted on 04/28/2006 7:50:39 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
From the New York Times:

In Legal Deal, Limbaugh Surrenders in Drug Case

Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk-radio host, was charged yesterday with prescription drug fraud and turned himself into Florida authorities as part of a deal to resolve a lengthy inquiry into whether he improperly obtained painkillers...

They don't call it the Slimes for nothing. Limbaugh's case is now effectively over, and he will not go to jail. That is the real news, not that he "surrendered." How typically vile of the Times to run that headline.

169 posted on 04/28/2006 7:51:31 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I happened to have Greta on tonight, and I listened to all of her "regulars" bury Rush as a junkie, etc. These are people she wants on every night, and they didn't mention the way his medical records were taken or any other position pro Rush. To them he is a scum bag.

I will never watch her show again.

170 posted on 04/28/2006 7:53:44 PM PDT by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: not2worry
O'Reilly never got over not being #1.

He had to buy his way onto the Los Angeles airwaves when he started up (literally pay for the airtime, versus making the bucks)...from what I understand that's pretty unheard of. "Vanity Radio"...

171 posted on 04/28/2006 7:54:39 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
How can you have a plea deal where the accused pleads not guilty and the state says, "Well, ok, we'll accept your not guilty plea and we won't prosecute if you are a good boy for 18mos, after which we will drop the charge and your not guilty plea."

What am I missing? How can you charge someone, allow them to plead not guilty and then not pursue the case?

172 posted on 04/28/2006 7:56:04 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Protect American jobs. Don't hire illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
What am I missing? How can you charge someone, allow them to plead not guilty and then not pursue the case?

Because this DA had a very weak case. A face saving deal.

173 posted on 04/28/2006 7:59:26 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I sympathize with Rush's past problems with drugs. I also have a bad spinal disk and fell into near drug abuse. It's so easy and is not a good thing. Hydrocodone is like some sort of memory-eraser over time.

There are new non-narcotic and very effective chemicals that are as effective. I was lucky. Somebody told me I was I was doing things incorrectly. Now I do things correctly. Only use opiates to kill the immediate onset of pain. Don't get trapped into abuse you don't even know is happening to you.

174 posted on 04/28/2006 8:00:10 PM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: george76

LOL..............It is good to see Baghdad Bob back...I have really missed him....


175 posted on 04/28/2006 8:00:36 PM PDT by conservativeammom (Granny to Benjamin.....Born 4-21-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The legal system is a crazy thing.

Judges issue adjournments in contemplation of dismissal (ACD's) all the time. If someone doesn't follow that order, they will be re-arrested and then the first charge will be re-entered, usually along with the second charge (whatever crime they committed to cause the second arrest...usually for not obeying whatever was in the ACD order).


176 posted on 04/28/2006 8:02:15 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Yje Liberal wing nut media want to shut Rushie down real bad! They thought they had him! And slippery Limber Limbaugh scudded the corner and they thought the coops had him?

What a yoke!

From a bunch of bad eggs too!

177 posted on 04/28/2006 8:02:19 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...

Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING

Drive By Media ----

RAT - a tat tat ---

character assassination as a way of life...


178 posted on 04/28/2006 8:02:34 PM PDT by weegee ("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

A case for libel?


179 posted on 04/28/2006 8:03:57 PM PDT by weegee ("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The dumbass prosecutor should be prosecuted for malfeasance.

I think it's obvious it was politically motivated. I think Ron Earle's is also of Delay (but I haven't kept up with that lately to know what new "dirt" Earle's supposedly brought up since I read the initial charges...which were, imho, ridiculous).

180 posted on 04/28/2006 8:04:10 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson