Skip to comments.
Israel 'using chemical weapons' [Lebanese doctor "accused Israel of using phosphorus bombs"]
News.Com.AU
| July 27,2006
| From correspondents in Beirut
Posted on 07/27/2006 3:31:44 AM PDT by yankeedame
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: yankeedame
OK, so why don't someone call the cops.
2
posted on
07/27/2006 3:33:05 AM PDT
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: yankeedame
More or less the same article
here with quite a good discussion.
To: yankeedame
Libs will FINALLY believe there are WMD in the Middle East!
It was The Jooos all along!
4
posted on
07/27/2006 3:33:57 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(http://www.savethesoldiers.com/)
To: yankeedame
The Israelis are 100 per cent using chemical weapons. Technically, any explosive compound is a chemical.
Human Rights Watch, which has accused the Israeli army of using cluster bombs in populated areas....
That's where they work best......in clusters.
The corpses of these victims are shrinking to half their normal size. You think it is the corpse of a child at first but it turns out to be a grown man.....
This may explain why so many of the casualties are reported as children.
5
posted on
07/27/2006 3:45:09 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
To: yankeedame
In Okinawa the U.S. used flame throwers to kill suicidal Japanese holed up in underground bunkers.
The Islraelis should use poison gas and falme throwers to rout these Hezebollah rats out their burrows.
Complaininig about using these kinds of weapons on creatures like the Hezebollah murderers is utter nonensense.
6
posted on
07/27/2006 4:04:01 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: yankeedame
...we have no confirmation yet that illegal weapons have been used," Health Minister Mohammed Khalife said. Surprising objectivity.
7
posted on
07/27/2006 4:04:35 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(If it's good and decent, you can be sure the Democrat Party leaders are against it.)
To: yankeedame
...the war between Israel and Hezbollah guerrillas that has seen at least 418 people, mostly civilians... Earth to Reuters: Terrorists don't wear uniforms! And Hezbollah is certainly NOT going to tell you they've had 1,283 (whatever) DRT (Dead Right There) terrorists comrades.
8
posted on
07/27/2006 4:08:28 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(If it's good and decent, you can be sure the Democrat Party leaders are against it.)
To: yankeedame
"Phosphorus shells do have a legitimate use in illuminating the battlefield at night. The offensive use of phosphorus would be a violation of international conventions."
New Advertising Slogan
Israel, Bringing the light of reason and civilization to terrorist slugs everywhere.
9
posted on
07/27/2006 4:10:07 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: libertylover
The Hezzies have their insidious (CBR) munitions scattered all through a complicit civilian populace .. a conventional, Israeli weapon sets one or more off .. the 'blame' is laid on Israel.
10
posted on
07/27/2006 4:11:00 AM PDT
by
knarf
(A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
To: yankeedame
Let me ask a question: The article states
"Blackened bodies have been showing up at hospitals in southern Lebanon two weeks into the war between Israel and Hezbollah guerrillas that has seen at least 418 people, mostly civilians, killed in Lebanon and at least 42 Israelis."Now my question, How does one tell the difference between a dead terrorist and a dead civilian when both wear civilian clothing? And if you can't tell, then why cliam they are dead civilians and not dead terrorist?
To: yankeedame
"Lebanese doctor "accused Israel of using phosphorus bombs"
Hizbullah "doctor" spewing out anti-Israeli propaganda?
Non-story.
The hammering of Hizbullah vermin is going to continue unabated sucker.
12
posted on
07/27/2006 4:19:07 AM PDT
by
Jameison
To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing
"How does one tell the difference between a dead terrorist and a dead civilian when both wear civilian clothing?"
They can't. They simply repeat what Hizbullah tells them as gospel.
"And if you can't tell, then why claim they are dead civilians and not dead terrorist"
That's hate-Israel, hate-America Al Reuters doing its normal pro-terrorist shilling.
Difference is, we now have the conservative blogs/news sites/boards, talk radio, Fox News etc to hammer them when they come up with this BS.
13
posted on
07/27/2006 4:25:10 AM PDT
by
Jameison
To: yankeedame
When does a bomb become a chemical bomb? It is my understanding that a phosphorus bomb is an incendiary device, and that it uses a chemical to start a fire. It doesn't use chemical interactions with human physiology to kill, which is the usual definition of a chemical weapon.
Similarly, a conventional high explosive bomb uses chemicals to create an explosion. This is not a chemical weapon, just because it uses chemicals.
Ain't none of them nice bombs, however.
14
posted on
07/27/2006 4:33:27 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
To: yankeedame
He never assumed they might be Hez weapons?
15
posted on
07/27/2006 4:48:06 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
To: wolfcreek
This is a classic case of fuel air bomb explosion.
To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing
Now my question, How does one tell the difference between a dead terrorist and a dead civilian when both wear civilian clothing? And if you can't tell, then why cliam they are dead civilians and not dead terrorist? They're all civilians. Some are innocent civilians, and some are criminal terrorist civilians. Differentiating between the two types of civilians is very difficult.
Omlettes and eggs.
17
posted on
07/27/2006 5:11:26 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
To: yankeedame
The corpses of these victims are shrinking to half their normal size. Bravo Sierra.
18
posted on
07/27/2006 5:30:42 AM PDT
by
EricT.
(SpecOps needs to paint the NYT building with a targeting laser.)
To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing
Well approximately one-third are little kids, according to most published reports from a variety of sources. The photos of the mass burials show shorter coffins, for the children, and they seem to number about one-third of the burials.
While there is no guarantee that a child under 10 is not a terrorist, the majority are likely to be just kids killed accidently.
To: yankeedame
Just out of curiosity, what would the combustion products be from secondary explosions when a rocket stash was hit? I'd think there'd be some similarity to willie pete. My bet is that rocket propellant residue is what will be found.
20
posted on
07/27/2006 6:17:59 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Occupation does not cause terrorism; terrorism causes occupation. (A. Dershowitz))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson