Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Job discrimination against smokers is allowed, says Brussels
EUobserver ^ | Aug 07 2006 | Lisbeth Kirk

Posted on 08/07/2006 1:02:04 AM PDT by Marius3188

A European company has the right to refuse employment to smokers, European Commissioner for employment and equal opportunities of Employers Vladimir Spidla has confirmed.

Scottish Labour MEP Catherine Stihler brought the issue to the commission after Irish call-centre company Dotcom Directories had advertised for a worker but said smokers needed not apply.

"If people are smoking on a coffee break or in their own time they come back into the office and they stink. We have a small office here and it would make things unbearable for the other staff", said Philip Tobin, director of Dotcom Directories in a radio interview.

EU legislation prohibits discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin, disability, age, sexual orientation and religion and belief in employment and other fields.

"A job advertisement saying that 'smokers need not apply' would not seem to fall under any of the ... prohibited grounds," the commissioner stated in a written reply to the MEP, quoted by the Financial Times.

"We all know employers discriminate on all sorts of grounds, from being too fat to the wrong colour hair. But for it to be so overt is depressing and shows that smokers are fair game," said Simon Clark, director of the British pro-smoking pressure group Forest to the paper.

In December last year the World Health Organisation became the largest international employer to ban the hiring of smokers in an effort to promote its public health campaign against tobacco use.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: brussels; discrimination; eu; europe; job; pufflist; smokers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2006 1:02:07 AM PDT by Marius3188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
they come back into the office and they stink.

I don't like smelly people either, but people who smoke on their breaks aren't so offensive as to merit legal discrimination against them.

Personally, their smell offends me less than their frequent smoke breaks.

2 posted on 08/07/2006 1:36:57 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
I'm always curious to know why the generally leftist Europeans, who love to brag that they're healthier than Americans (mostly because of the compulsory military service or other 'volunteering' jobs), don't seem bother by smoking as much as many Americans do.
3 posted on 08/07/2006 1:37:33 AM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

Smokers where I work spend more time outside than they do on their jobs. I don't mind the smoking as much as I do chewing. The man I work with chews and spits tobacco juice/spit in all the trash cans all day. Nasty! They aren't allowed to smoke inside the facility so the ones that don't want to spend all day on the porch, chew.


4 posted on 08/07/2006 2:42:11 AM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Will Brussels next require you to eat your Brussels sprouts?


5 posted on 08/07/2006 2:42:25 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Smoking is a personal choice, refusing to hire a smoker is also a personal choice.


6 posted on 08/07/2006 3:46:46 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Smoking is a personal choice, refusing to hire a smoker is also a personal choice.


7 posted on 08/07/2006 3:46:48 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
I'd love to see them try to do this to someone who's ethnic food "would make things unbearable for the other staff..."

And the EU is full of silly gooses: It's perfectly lawful to discriminate against any white male! No need to put "smoke screens" in front of our eyes!

8 posted on 08/07/2006 4:13:31 AM PDT by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
"Smoking is a personal choice, refusing to hire a smoker is also a personal choice"

Hmmmm...Let's see, using that rationale,

"Homosexual conduct is a personal choice, refusing to hire a homosexual is also a personal choice"....

I like the idea, but don't think the argument would hold up very well in today's PC-zealot trendiness...

9 posted on 08/07/2006 4:13:46 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

"If people are smoking on a coffee break or in their own time they come back into the office and they stink"

and if they had a coffe on top, it becomes a WMD!


10 posted on 08/07/2006 4:27:47 AM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
"Homosexual conduct is a personal choice, refusing to hire a homosexual is also a personal choice"....

You are correct, however, I have always rejected the arguement that "You're wrong, therefore I have the right to be wrong too"
11 posted on 08/07/2006 4:29:49 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

So is deviant/gay sex, but for some reason you can't discriminate against potential employees who engage in high risk behavior, even though they could easily milk your health plan with the cost of thier behavior. Personnally, my observation is smokers are more focused on the job. The perceived cost to the employee is minimal when compared to aids. One other note, they aren't the ones who normally catch and spread the colds/flu that visits an office every year. I would assume that an employer who mandates no-smoking in hiring is performing a urine or blood test to know. If he knows you smoke, he also knows many other things about you.


12 posted on 08/07/2006 4:36:16 AM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN
Smokers where I work spend more time outside than they do on their jobs.

Just the opposite here. It's the non-smokers who spend twice the time in the break room (then try to figure out why they can't lose weight, ha!) The problem is.... smokers are more obvious when they take breaks because they have to leave their work areas.

13 posted on 08/07/2006 5:00:14 AM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tigtog
So is deviant/gay sex, but for some reason you can't discriminate against potential employees who engage in high risk behavior

See post 11.

BTW, there are lots of companies that are still willing to hire smokers but the ones who don't wish to shouldn't be forced to either. The fact that sexual orientation is protected is disturbing, but affording smokers the same protection doesn't make things even or fair, it only compounds things.
14 posted on 08/07/2006 5:16:57 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
Personally, their smell offends me less than their frequent smoke breaks.

I know....I thought about it, more than once, about taking up smoking just to be able to stand outside for 10 minutes every half hour.

15 posted on 08/07/2006 5:23:42 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee

Um...excuse me. Are you saying people who don't smoke are overweight?


16 posted on 08/07/2006 5:25:49 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN

I read your post and I thought you have to be working in a hillbilly hell.


17 posted on 08/07/2006 5:33:03 AM PDT by Paulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Tobacco smoking is dying out.


18 posted on 08/07/2006 5:45:43 AM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
I thought about it, more than once, about taking up smoking just to be able to stand outside for 10 minutes every half hour.

If your company allows that, it's the companies fault. "10 minutes every halfhour"? I would say that is BS.

Further more, where I work, EVERYONE is entitled to two 15 minute breaks during the day.

I think you're trying to blow smoke up my.....something.

FMCDH(BITS)

19 posted on 08/07/2006 5:55:49 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Guess smokers are Europe's new Jews. Funny how most of Hitlers' desires were carried in spite of the fact that he lost the war.


20 posted on 08/07/2006 5:57:35 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson