[WhiteKnight]

Please go back and re-read your post #85. "may be" is right there where you copied from my previous post. As that is the only part of my post you refered to, it seemed reasonable to assume that is what you were calling blatant. If you are refering to any other part of the post you should have indicated so. I stand by what I posted about the theory of evolution.

W.K.

[freedumb2003]

Please go back and re-read your post #85. "may be" is right there where you copied from my previous post.

Oh -- you were talking about your reference to ME (I believe you used "might be"). Here I thought you wanted to talk about the subject of your post, not silly name-calling. Had I realized your orientation, I would have been clearer on what I am saying.

I stand by what I posted about the theory of evolution.

Despite the fact I have provided a dead-bang direct refutation. Pretty standard for people like you.

[freedumb2003]

I stand by what I posted about the theory of evolution.

And THAT statement was the original blatAnt assertion which I properly dispatched with the appropriate level of mild disdain and amusement, Dr. ScEInce.