Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katherine Harris: God Didn't Want Secular U.S.
NewsMax ^ | 27 August 2006

Posted on 08/27/2006 7:01:21 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher

U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris told a religious journal that separation of church and state is "a lie" and God and the nation's founding fathers did not intend the country be "a nation of secular laws."

The Florida Republican candidate for U.S. Senate also said that if Christians are not elected, politicians will "legislate sin," including abortion and gay marriage.

Harris made the comments - which she clarified Saturday - in the Florida Baptist Witness, the weekly journal of the Florida Baptist State Convention, which interviewed political candidates and asked them about religion and their positions on issues.

Separation of church and state is "a lie we have been told," Harris said in the interview, published Thursday, saying separating religion and politics is "wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers."

"If you're not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin," Harris said.

Her comments drew criticism, including some from fellow Republicans who called them offensive and not representative of the party.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., who is Jewish, told the Orlando Sentinel that she was "disgusted" by the comments.

Harris' campaign released a statement Saturday saying she had been "speaking to a Christian audience, addressing a common misperception that people of faith should not be actively involved in government."

The comments reflected "her deep grounding in Judeo-Christian values," the statement said, adding that Harris had previously supported pro-Israel legislation and legislation recognizing the Holocaust.

Harris' opponents in the GOP primary also gave interviews to the Florida Baptist Witness but made more general statements on their faith.

Harris, 49, faced widespread criticism for her role overseeing the 2000 presidential recount as Florida's secretary of state.

State GOP leaders - including Gov. Jeb Bush - don't think she can win against Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson in November. Fundraising has lagged, frustrated campaign workers have defected in droves and the issues have been overshadowed by news of her dealings with a corrupt defense contractor who gave her $32,000 in illegal campaign contributions.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; churchandstate; congress; congresswoman; firstamendment; florida; foundingfathers; god; harris; katherinrharris; secular; wallofseparation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-412 next last
To: Aussie Dasher

So if we elect those that profess Christianity, they will legislate what exactly?

If you inject Christianity into politics, you taint Christianity. The best way to ensure the restoration of Christianity as the basis for this country's policies is though straight conversion of the people, not through taking over the government.

Do we want the election of those such as Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart or Benny Hinn? Would that be going in the right direction?


21 posted on 08/27/2006 8:16:58 AM PDT by Ottofire (Fire Tempers Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire

Judeo-Christian America bump


22 posted on 08/27/2006 8:35:51 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire

"The best way to ensure the restoration of Christianity as the basis for this country's policies is though straight conversion of the people, not through taking over the government."

That's the most sensible thing I've read regarding religion and government on this forum. Well stated, ottom.


23 posted on 08/27/2006 8:39:36 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Even if nobody else follows the Rules around here, I do!


She needs to take her stirrups up a notch, though.

-ccm

24 posted on 08/27/2006 8:57:35 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zendari

FR posters have an unworkably narrow definition of Christianity. What Harris is saying (as if you did not know) is that atheists in positions of power see only themselves as the final moral authority. Those with western religious roots recognize, and are tempered in their actions by, a higher authority. No one is saying Christians do not sin. The whole concept of sin is a central tenet of Christianity, as is man's imperfectability.

I live in Florida. Harris is getting my vote. Katherine Harris has demonstrated her character on more than one occasion. The Republicans down here are all RINO's including the President's brother. And the liberal media down here has never stopped beating up on Ms. Harris for enforcing the election laws against the Democrats. Not a day goes by that there are not unbelievably vicious hit pieces and columns in the Tribune or the Times trying to tear her to shreds. The reason is because outside of Tom Gallagher she is the only conservative running for office and man that scares hell out of all of the liberals. By the way Gallagher is hated too. Like the rest of the country, so goes Florida. Down the liberal sewer.


25 posted on 08/27/2006 9:05:40 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Yeah, Christian government works so well. Massachusetts had it for centuries, had an Established Church until 1833, even had blue laws up until recently, and look what an ornament to virtue it is today. For that matter, look at what an ornament it was fifty years ago.


26 posted on 08/27/2006 9:14:03 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

FR posters have an unworkably narrow definition of Christianity.

I always thought that Christianity refers to those who follow Christ - has that definition been changed?

What Harris is saying (as if you did not know) is that atheists in positions of power see only themselves as the final moral authority.

What I heard Harris saying is that only Christians are fit to serve and to legislate correctly. The obvious conclusion is that she believes that those of other faiths are not. I believe that's called bigotry.

27 posted on 08/27/2006 9:15:13 AM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: retMD

Again--the operative construct is that the distinction Ms. Harris draws is between those in elective office who are guided by and acknowledge a higher power than themselves--as did the Founders, and those who obviously believe that the self is the ultimate power.

Bigotry has nothing to do with it. So for example Jews, Orthodox Greeks, Russian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Baptist, Episcopalian, all fit the definition of Christian. Or Judeo-Christian if you want to be exact. Atheists do not fit the description. So only an atheist should find Ms Harris' statement offensive or bigoted.


28 posted on 08/27/2006 9:42:34 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

Sorry, I don't buy it. I can't see how Jews fit the definition of "Christian." And she didn't say "Judeo-Christian," she said "Christian."

If she was simply talking of those who are guided by a higher power, she could have used other words, such as "people of faith." (Of course that could includ Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, etc.)


29 posted on 08/27/2006 9:48:17 AM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: retMD

You are aware that this country has been under siege from atheists and America-haters within its own ranks for quite some time. Why are you at this late stage of the game so concerned about the color of the tank the opposition and the reinforcements are riding in while your house is tumbling down around you?


30 posted on 08/27/2006 10:16:25 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ottofire
So if we elect those that profess Christianity, they will legislate what exactly?

I think what they won't legislate is the point of her statement, and she is right about that.

31 posted on 08/27/2006 10:24:51 AM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: retMD
I always thought that Christianity refers to those who follow Christ - has that definition been changed?

Didn't you get the memo?

What I heard Harris saying is that only Christians are fit to serve and to legislate correctly. The obvious conclusion is that she believes that those of other faiths are not. I believe that's called bigotry.

I agree with you and will go so far as to say that it must be clar now that God must not want Katherine Harris as a senator if He allowes he to say such stupid things.

32 posted on 08/27/2006 10:28:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hershey
She's definitely right, but she just handed the Left a hammer to hit her in the head.

She's doing a fine job of nailing herself in the head. The left just has to sit back and watch. Maybe snicker a time or two.

33 posted on 08/27/2006 10:30:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: XR7
Thank God this woman has balls.

It would have been better if she had brains.

34 posted on 08/27/2006 10:31:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner
So for example Jews, Orthodox Greeks, Russian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Baptist, Episcopalian, all fit the definition of Christian. Or Judeo-Christian if you want to be exact. Atheists do not fit the description. So only an atheist should find Ms Harris' statement offensive or bigoted.

Do you think ANYONE would read that into her statement. That statement was dumber than anything to come out of a politician's mouth since the Dean Scream.

And I know there are many atheists who are good people who are more than qualified to lead. Moreso than many right wing fundies who think we should not follow the Constitution of the United States which explicitly prohibits selection of elected officials in Article IV.

If the Founding Fathers had wanted a Christian Nation, they would not have drafted Article IV or the 1st Amendment.

This was a stupid, stupid move by Harris. She has just ensured her marginalization to the extreme Right where she will stay forever.

35 posted on 08/27/2006 10:31:19 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The left just has to sit back and watch. Maybe snicker a time or two.

Lets see if she read Napoleon: "Do not interfere if your enemy is making a mistake."

36 posted on 08/27/2006 10:32:18 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Separation of church and state is "a lie we have been told," Harris said in the interview, published Thursday, saying separating religion and politics is "wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers."

We have rulers now? Who knew? I thought that that was what the American Revolution was about - so that the Americans could have a representative republic.

37 posted on 08/27/2006 10:33:37 AM PDT by FixedandDilated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner
Bigotry has nothing to do with it. So for example Jews, Orthodox Greeks, Russian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Baptist, Episcopalian, all fit the definition of Christian. Or Judeo-Christian if you want to be exact. Atheists do not fit the description. So only an atheist should find Ms Harris' statement offensive or bigoted.

I doubt you will find many jews who believe they are Christians and most would find the statement offensive and Harris bigoted.

38 posted on 08/27/2006 10:54:38 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; XR7
Thank God this woman has balls.

It would have been better if she had brains.

ROTFL!!

39 posted on 08/27/2006 10:57:37 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; XR7
Thank God this woman has balls.

It would have been better if she had brains.

ROTFL!!

40 posted on 08/27/2006 10:57:55 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-412 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson