Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court says UPS discriminated against deaf drivers
AP ^ | 10/10/6 | DAVID KRAVETS

Posted on 10/10/2006 12:59:50 PM PDT by SmithL

San Francisco -- A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a lower court ruling that UPS Inc. violated anti-discrimination laws by automatically barring the deaf and hearing-impaired from driving parcel delivery trucks.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson's 2004 ruling that the Atlanta-based company's practices breach the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Henderson, in a class-action case representing as many as 1,000 would-be drivers, ruled that the hearing impaired should "be given the same opportunities that a hearing applicant would be given to show that they can perform the job of package-car driver safely and effectively." The San Francisco federal court order was stayed pending appeal.

On appeal, UPS maintained its hiring practice was a safety issue and that it was not discriminating. The company did not immediately have a comment, a spokesman said.

"While UPS offered anecdotal testimony involving situations where a driver avoided an accident because he or she heard a warning sound, the company ... failed to show that those accidents would not also have been avoided by a deaf driver who was compensated for his or her loss of hearing by, for example, adapting modified driving techniques or using compensatory devices such as backing cameras or additional mirrors," Judge Marsha Berzon wrote for a three-judge panel of the appeals court.

The case was litigated by Disability Rights Advocates who represented current and former employees who were passed over for driving positions, and other potential employees who consented to what the group dubbed UPS's "deaf-need-not-apply" policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircus; deaf; dhoh; ups; whatcanbrowndo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last
To: SmithL

Deaf people are legally allowed to drive? Excuse my ignorance on this one, but isn't hearing a required ability to drive a car? Now, I know there are many morons out there driving with their stereos blaring, but if caught, can't they be given citations for that? Isn't the reason behind that a safety reason? Maybe I'm just being dee-dee-dee, but if I'm not...oh, wait, you said the 9th circus?...nevermind...


61 posted on 10/10/2006 2:19:54 PM PDT by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yeah and we should stop stupid people from becoming judges.

That will be a good first step.


62 posted on 10/10/2006 2:20:16 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
What ?
63 posted on 10/10/2006 2:20:44 PM PDT by pipecorp ( Al Lahsucks...Islam: nothing that a good crusade wouldn't fix ;; mercy is wasted on the merciless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

You said -- "Are they out of their minds? Driving deaf is a serious safety issue. I am sure their insurer would not allow it."

In the general market, insurers cover deaf drivers right now. Being deaf and driving (right now) is not an issue with state agencies issuing drivers licenses and with insurers giving coverage.

In fact, from what I've seen from the way some hearing people drive, deaf people are better drivers because they are more alert on the visual level, because they make it a point to be.



You also said -- "So what will be next? Will the 9th Circuit rule that UPS should be forced to hire blind drivers as well?"

Well, that's obviously a joke since I'm sure even you "see" the difference.

Regards,
Star Traveler


64 posted on 10/10/2006 2:24:50 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Andonius_99

You said -- "Deaf people are legally allowed to drive? Excuse my ignorance on this one, but isn't hearing a required ability to drive a car?"

Well, your question and a lot of other people's comments here show a severe lack of knowledge about the deaf community. Of course they're allowed to drive. It's never been a safety issue. State *do* issue driver's licenses to deaf people.

AND, that's *one good reason* for having the ADA -- in order to force people (if necessary) to come to terms and understand that these disabilities (that some people have) should not restrict them from doing certain things -- and also -- that society should accommodate them on other things.

I'm glad people are becoming *more educated* here.

Regards,
Star Traveler


65 posted on 10/10/2006 2:28:05 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: hotshu

Come on...we know DJ is blind, but he is not deaf!


66 posted on 10/10/2006 2:28:56 PM PDT by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I delivered for UPS for 29 years and took a hearing test with each physical. I doubt that if I had flunked that test, I would have been allowed to continue working therer, according to I.C.C. rules.


67 posted on 10/10/2006 2:30:40 PM PDT by Straight8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud

You said -- "In any case, what's the difference between a deaf driver and a hearing driver who is listening to a loud radio? And finally, you don't see many deaf drivers chatting on cell phones, do ya?"

Yes, they're more visually aware of their surrounding circumstances, because it's their "lifeline".

Regards,
Star Traveler

P.S. -- It's too bad that so many FReepers are so woefully ignorant on the subject. I've seen it before (on previoius threads) about the deaf community.


68 posted on 10/10/2006 2:31:00 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1

You said -- "So....exactly WHY do trains blow their horns when they approach a crossing?"

Because it sounds cool. And also, it scares the little kids.

Otherwise, look both ways and proceed carefully -- *regardless* of horn or "no horn".

Regards,
Star Traveler


69 posted on 10/10/2006 2:33:33 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
In any case, what's the difference between a deaf driver and a hearing driver who is listening to a loud radio?

The hearing driver listening to the loud radio would be distracted. The deaf driver would not.

And finally, you don't see many deaf drivers chatting on cell phones, do ya?

Well, now that you mention it . . .

70 posted on 10/10/2006 2:34:41 PM PDT by Hoodat ( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
"Didn't you hear those police sirens?"

Since when does the Americans with Disability Act require common sense in order to make the lawyer and client rich?

Remember Exon was sued because the drunk captain ran the tanker aground in Alaska.

Then they were sued again because they didn't rehire the him.
71 posted on 10/10/2006 2:35:09 PM PDT by a02001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

You said -- "I see young kids driving by with music blaring so loud, they may as well be deaf."

Yeah, and the car manufacturers are advertising that their cars are *so soundproof* that you can't hear anything outside -- making the inside of your car your own private room (with no outside disturbances).

With me, I turn on the air conditioner blower and put it on high and I can't hear a thing outside (with that fan going). And I hear good (no problems there). Also, at times, I've had people in the car that want the radio on, up a bit loud, too -- and you're right, you can't hear what's going on outside.

In those cases, you're *highly dependent* upon your *eyes* to warn you of what's happening.

Regards,
Star Traveler


72 posted on 10/10/2006 2:38:20 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: flutters

You said -- "A deaf person can operate a vehicle just fine and probably more observant of their surroundings than the hearing."

That's absolutely right. The deaf person has a highly tuned ability for "seeing". I don't mean that they actually see any better (physically) -- but rather -- that they *pay attention* better than the hearing person does. The hearing person will rely upon their sense of hearing to the detriment of their sight (at least to the extent that the deaf person uses it).

Regards,
Star Traveler


73 posted on 10/10/2006 2:40:48 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Have you noticed, UPS does not have any drivers in wheelchairs?


74 posted on 10/10/2006 2:41:16 PM PDT by N. Theknow ((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

He's just gettin' a bit long in the tooth. Is UPS going with him to Toyota?


75 posted on 10/10/2006 2:41:38 PM PDT by hotshu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"The Ninth Circuit does it.."
"The Ninth Circuit does it.."
"again."
"again."
76 posted on 10/10/2006 2:44:41 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Yeah, and I bet they discriminated against the blind drivers, too! (/sarc for those so stupid you might think this was serious)

Don't know how to tell ya this, Tommy, but I recall reading years ago that UPS *was* sued for not allowing people who were blind in one eye to drive the trucks.

This either happened or my aging memory is failing me.

77 posted on 10/10/2006 2:45:03 PM PDT by freespirited (A government big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Impossible.

"DJ, you can go towards the front anytime now."

"Say that again!"

"Now is the time to GO, driver!"

"What did you say?"

"GO GO GO - NOW!"

"10-4. I'll just hang right here for a few more laps."

78 posted on 10/10/2006 2:47:22 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That's interesting, thanks for that little tidbit of knowledge! I didn't realize that.


79 posted on 10/10/2006 2:54:58 PM PDT by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
proof that even self-proclaimed conservatives instinctively reason like leftists given the right stimulus. Even played the "JimRob" card.

This isn't a fair fight, logically, so I'm going to do the stand-up thing and withdraw.

80 posted on 10/10/2006 3:00:29 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (* nuke * the * jihad *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson