1/3 of Likely Voters Remain Persuadable

FOXNews | November 4, 2006 | Nancee

[Nancee]

I just heard, on FOXNews that well over 33.3% of likely voters reamin "persuadable". So, if you're here in Pennsylvania, or anywhere else for that matter, call your Republican Headquarters, ask what you can do to get the vote out for Senator Santorum and other really conservative candidates, and then, PLEASE, do it. Let's stay focused and work!

Thank you all!!!

Nancee

[Nancee]

PING!!!


Nancee

[TracyPA]

I live in Northeast Pa, my son lives in Harrisburg and we can't wait to vote the straight Republican ticket!! Go Rick!! I am even voting for our congressman Don Sherwood (who had some personal scandle). The Dems won't get my help to take over the House. I know this is hopeless, but Lynn Swann over "Fast Eddie Rendell" for Governor of PA!!

[Nancee]

PING!!!


Nancee

[Nancee]

Hi there, "TracyPA"!!!

Thank you!


Nancee

[Hoodat]

1/3 of Likely Voters Remain Persuadable

This can't be. The DBM has already assured me that it's already a lock for the Dems to take over both houses. They couldn't be lying to me, could they?

[Big Horn]

I never did understand, why this close to an election, there are still undecided voters. I do understand people are busy with their own lives; but surely they must be paying some attention to whats going on politically.

I know people who think politics and voting are very unimportant and boring. I think the are nuts.

[Nancee]

PING!!!


Nancee

[Nancee]

Of course they're lying to you! It's what they do best!!!

:)


Nancee

[Joan Kerrey]

well over 33.3% of likely voters reamin "persuadable".

This is hard to believe. If ever there was an election where sides were so clearly defined, this is it.

[Nancee]

I know, but I also know what I experienced yesterday. People are still open to listening. And we have people signed up to take these registered voters to the polls. We work in teams and the response was and remains very positive.

Pray for us here in Pennsylvania.

Thanks!


Nancee

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

I'll see your Ping! and raise you a BTTT!

[Nancee]

PING!!!


Nancee

[Nancee]

What a picture!

Nancee

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

My daughter just told me a cute story. Last night she was taking 5 boys to a math contest in NW Iowa. They got stopped for about 40 minutes because of the president's motorcade going by.

She said one boy got out of the car and yelled: "President Bush, you're my hero. Kill those ragheads!!"

[Nancee]

Out of the mouths of babes! Wonderful!!

Thanks for sharing that! :) :) :)


Nancee

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

She said the conversation between the boys then degraded to calling them "sheetheads". She said two of the boys did not like Bush.

[Nancee]

This demonstrates that we need to teach our children and grandchildren and great grandchildren the facts. We need to instruct them to educate themselves responsibly, do we not? Children are so impressionable. One does not have to wonder for very long where our children are getting their data. Friends, school, etc. They need us to be responsible for educating them. And teaching them not to simply adopt any position because someone else has. And "Conservativegreatgrandma" I know you'll take every opportunity to do just that with your precious great grandchildren!!

Thanks again!


Nancee

[Nancee]

PING!!!


Nancee

[edpc]

Persuadable isn't the same as undecided. Persuadable means something could make you change your mind. You should remain persuadable up until the minute you vote, you just never when candidate X whom you've been supporting since he announced his candidacy is going to suddenly admit a taste for the flesh of the unborn. If you didn't remain persuadable you'd still vote for the freaky abortionist cannibal. Best to remain open and give candidates every opportunity to lose your support.

Trouble is.....I'm not a single-issue voter. If I was, I'd still be waiting since 1986 to vote for the first time. I've had to vote for a few candidates with whom I did not totally agree. I can safely say in my state (MD), there are, or should be, no questions. I will never vote for a MD Democrat and third parties in this state (and most others) are in disarray. Other states don't seem that different from mine.

All chin-stroking musings aside, when I hear someone declare themselves "open-minded" and "persuadable", I interpret that as Gullible Dupe. Maybe that makes me close-minded or stubborn, but that's the way I roll.....ya dig?

See you in the forum.

[discostu]

Who said anything about being a single issue voter?! Actually if anything having multiple issues should keep you persuadable longer, since it's rare to agree fully with any candidate on all issues. Maybe in MD there are no questions. Out in the rest of the world there frequently are, just the last mayoral election I had the choice between the crappy incumbent R and the lame former D, I gave them as long as possible to find a good reason to vote for either of them, eventually I wrote in "empty seat" to punish both parties for giving me such lame choices. And the proposition to give the mayor a raise that year lost with barely 1/3 of the vote, apparently I wasn't the only person in town aghast at our choices.

Remember nearly 1/3 of the country has picked either no party allegiance or one of the extra parties, that leaves a lot of people with no external loyalty to help them decide their vote. Maybe the people who are undecided late are the actual deep thinkers, or maybe they're just indecisive. Everybody is different and has to figure out their own vote their way, slamming anybody for how they make said decision is the really stupid thing.