Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAME DUCK BUSH IS LEFT CRIPPLED BY A CRUSHING VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE
NY Post ^ | 11/8/06 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 11/08/2006 5:27:18 AM PST by teddyballgame

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: BluH2o

"I've voted for Bush twice, even had my picture taken with him ... however, reality is what it is and Bush is by every measure a lame duck president for the remainder of his Presidency. He knows it ..."

What he thinks he knows is that his OBL agenda for shamnesty will now have an easier time passing with a Dim congress. Clearly he had no qualms about dividing the party and risking a loss in majority by siding with the libs on this issue. Open borders and amnesty won out over winning the WOT.

"FoxNews reporting from the White House: White House spokesman Tony Snow reacted to the change in House control by allowing they're disappointed, but that it presents some intriguing opportunities, such as passing comprehensive immigration reform which failed in the previous Republican House."


21 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:31 AM PST by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Boy, talk about over reaction. Get some sleep, John. Your mind has burned out.


22 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:33 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Likely the Democrats will overplay their hand this next two years and help again to elect a Republican to the White House....


23 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:33 AM PST by John Carey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
On the plus side, I think today's result increases the chance that we'll be able to hold om to the Whitehouse in '08.

Why do you say this? All Hillary needs to do is hold Kerry's states and add Ohio, which I think is very doable. I don't buy the notion that Nancy Pelosi will turn people off to women leaders. She will focus the anger on herself, and Hillary will benefit from the comparison.

24 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:40 AM PST by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
As for the taxes, we have chance on that since they don't expire for a few more years.
25 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:59 AM PST by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
During the Bush Presidency there won't be tax increases, because the Bush tax cuts are not due yet to sunset, and, since the President would successfully veto any new legislation raising taxes, the Dems won't try.

More wishful thinking. The tax cuts are as good as gone.

26 posted on 11/08/2006 5:53:02 AM PST by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA

Bush does NOT have the stones to do what needs to be done with Iran.They are pretty much guaranteed to acquire a nuclear weapon. And who will be the proud recipients of that nuke?
Some democrat-infested major city in the USA. You reap what you sow.
Lead pipe cinch that it will be either McCain or Juliani
against the HILDEBEAST.I never thought Santorum would get
spanked by 18 points. Unless he moves out of Penn. , he is
toast politically.


27 posted on 11/08/2006 5:53:32 AM PST by FreeMarketCapitalist (Wait till you hear what Mark Levin said)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

ok, if you're sure. My guess he'll be too compassionate conservative do do much more.


28 posted on 11/08/2006 5:53:41 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

I totally agree.


29 posted on 11/08/2006 5:55:33 AM PST by RetiredArmy (ANYONE who votes for the Abortion Democrats are enemies of the Republic, and ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame
Well Bush fought the democrats and the war in Iraq with Compassionate Conservatism

Maybe he didn't give Teddy enough Popcorn

Yeah the MSM is a big problem but it wasn't the MSM who failed to veto CFR--Failed to clear the Clintonites out of the goverment--wanted Harriet Myers on the court--didn't run a war in Iraq like he should have been run--left Sandy Berger off the hook --was completely out of touch on Illegal Immigration --etc etc
30 posted on 11/08/2006 5:55:48 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

And since one of the results of this election has been the election of more moderate Democrats, last night's new Congressmen will serve as a check on liberal-to-radical Dems who seem determined to turn themselves into proctologists investigating every internal aspect of the Bush administration.

Sorry John, but I think that you're completely wrong here. Remember who RUNS the democratic party. Remember who holds the pursestrings. Remember who's in the leadership positions. Those newly elected members of congress, most of whom were elected BECAUSE they ran as "moderates" or even "conservatives" will find that if they want to have an office bigger than a coffin, or be assigned to any committees, they're going to have to go along with the hard leftists on pretty much every issue.

Mark

31 posted on 11/08/2006 5:56:20 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

"On the plus side, I think today's result increases the chance that we'll be able to hold om to the Whitehouse in '08.
Why do you say this? All Hillary needs to do is hold Kerry's states and add Ohio, which I think is very doable. I don't buy the notion that Nancy Pelosi will turn people off to women leaders. She will focus the anger on herself, and Hillary will benefit from the comparison."

The moonbats won't rest. They'll want to kick the ever-lovin' snot out of Bush for the next two years. Don't buy this bipartison crap. The want Bush bloodied and beatin' with investigations and hearings. It's the only way to grease the skids for Hillary in '08. Remember the "culture of curruption", well it worked for them in '06 what makes you think they won't use it in '08?


32 posted on 11/08/2006 5:56:41 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: John Carey
Likely the Democrats will overplay their hand this next two years and help again to elect a Republican to the White House...

Yeah now that they have their victory it remains to be seen what they do with it--especially Illegal Immigration and the war effort against Radical Islam

They really have no idea on anything except be against Bush

Now it will be time to put up and expect some nast infighting among the democrats
33 posted on 11/08/2006 5:58:34 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame
The moonbats won't rest. They'll want to kick the ever-lovin' snot out of Bush for the next two years.

Absolutely. They'll overreach, leaving Hillary to appear the voice of sweet reason (Attila the Hun is the voice of sweet reason compared to Nancy Pelosi). Hillary is the big winner yesterday, which is why the choice of her GOP opponent is so important.

34 posted on 11/08/2006 6:00:21 AM PST by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: randita
and one-time hawks who think Iraq was a perfectly fine thing to do in the first place, but that it's a huge mess now

The problem is that too much of the general population is too easily swayed by the media hammering them with negative news and opinions on the war.

Right after 9/11 we were shaken out of complacency.

Years later we seem to have forgotten that many things that are worth doing and must be done aren't quick or easy.

We're in a war. Our enemy is throwing a great deal of resources at us and aren't fighting by the rules of war.

Of course there are casualties. Of course it's a hard fight. Of course there are risks.

However, no one is presenting a better overall plan than the president. They are just attacking his efforts without a real plan of their own.

The only other plan being offered is appeasement, and history has clearly shown time and time again that doesn't solve problems, it makes them worse over the long run.

35 posted on 11/08/2006 6:01:34 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The large expeditionary force in Iraq will not be there in six months.

The People have spoken.

Yeah, and it's going to be really exciting to watch the reaction when the first suicide bomber goes off at an American mall. We'll be needing every one of those troops right here. The media won't mention the connection, but in the backs of everyone's mind will be the sure and certain knowledge that the 2006 election brought it home.

36 posted on 11/08/2006 6:01:56 AM PST by McGavin999 (Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

It's also a repudiation of everyone who has helped the U.S. over the last five years.


37 posted on 11/08/2006 6:02:42 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

They'll try to raise taxes and they have to do it soon. Anyone whose state has a newly elected Dem governor: It's the first thing they do, so that people will forget.


38 posted on 11/08/2006 6:02:46 AM PST by AmishDude (Democrats raise taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Does anyone know thw date when the tax cuts expire?


39 posted on 11/08/2006 6:03:11 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (U.S. out of the U.N., and the U.N. out of the U.S.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
I am with you. Clinton was not a leader but he was a great counter puncher. With a Republican Congress, Clinton had an enemy he could attack. I just don't see Bush having these skills. He is more of a leader and is not an effective counter puncher. I see him as a very lame duck right now. My only hope is for the democrats to self destruct and for a bright conservative Republican nominee to capture the voter's anger. I can count on the Democrats to self destruct. I am pessimistic about the Republican nominee.
40 posted on 11/08/2006 6:03:27 AM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson