Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Ted Haggard delivered control to the Democrats
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 11/11/06 | By Charles McVety

Posted on 11/11/2006 12:38:04 AM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Thunder90
Many of those evangelicals are part of the Pysbertarian church, which has a track record of being ultra liberal.

And that is called "bearing false witness". Find a liberal Presbyterian body on this list: http://www.nae.net/index.cfm?FUSEACTION=nae.members

41 posted on 11/11/2006 1:38:38 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

I guess you want this place to be Donk City.


42 posted on 11/11/2006 1:39:36 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
So is it purely a matter of being part of this organization, or does it denote all non-high church Protestants, or is there some specific theological or liturgical definition. I am confused!!

Oh well, as was said above, let us pray on it, and fight the good fight against the leftists.
43 posted on 11/11/2006 1:43:29 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

2 Thessalonians 2
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.


44 posted on 11/11/2006 1:44:09 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Maybe Christans should start the Do-Over Denomination?
45 posted on 11/11/2006 1:44:15 AM PST by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

So you'd prefer a 2/3rds Lib rodent Congress and legislatures and ineffective lib RINO opposition ? I think you're on the wrong website, friend.


46 posted on 11/11/2006 1:47:44 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

What a stupid concept. Conjured up by a complete idiot!


47 posted on 11/11/2006 1:49:25 AM PST by lawdude (The dems see Wal-Mart as a bigger threat to the US than muslim terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I am an evangelical Christian, and I have never heard of this man until he made the headlines.


48 posted on 11/11/2006 1:50:28 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (Go back and do your duty even as I have done mine. I would rather die than be whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

What is a true Evangelical? I guess I'm not really sure either.


49 posted on 11/11/2006 1:50:28 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Then I will have to redo my post. I am a fundamentalist and not a evangelical. At least I know who I am now. (Not that I'm that confused. I'm a Christian. I think that sums it up pretty darn tight. As for the rest, details that I don't concern myself with.)


50 posted on 11/11/2006 1:53:23 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (Go back and do your duty even as I have done mine. I would rather die than be whipped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good article, thanks for posting, but I think what happened with Haggard is that God exposed him and brought him down just like God brought down Baker and Swaggart. I knew about Haggard when I voted and I voted straight Repubican.

The fact is, God will not allow His holy name to be dragged through the mud and God will not allow a man who has access to thousands of souls to use Him to try to implement an agenda that is against His commandments and principles. That's what I belive happened with Haggard.

51 posted on 11/11/2006 2:09:18 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanFreePath

When are all religions going to free themselves up from crazy men on power guilt fear and control trips.


52 posted on 11/11/2006 2:27:27 AM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

I concur with the Google/Youtube assessment -- college turnout was significant here in Wisconsin. And college kids couldn't care less about Foley and the MSM scandals.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=528978


53 posted on 11/11/2006 2:33:05 AM PST by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
When are all religions going to free themselves up from crazy men on power guilt fear and control trips.

A long time ago I heard of the 'The Committee to Repeal Original Sin'. Unfortunately its work is not yet completed! This is true for religious folks and non-religious folks.

54 posted on 11/11/2006 2:40:48 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

The timing of Haggard public meltdown was uncannily 'perfect' for the radical Dems victory election sweep.


55 posted on 11/11/2006 2:40:53 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Very true.


56 posted on 11/11/2006 2:42:25 AM PST by tkathy (The choice is clear: White hat people or white flag people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
As a Baptist I never heard of Haggard.

However, from seeing his picture, I am surprised that he could fool so many people.

I am sure many of these mega-church organizations are headed by homosexuals.

Most seem to all have an effeminate aspect about them

57 posted on 11/11/2006 2:56:53 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
There are big E and little e evangelicals. (Sort of like a big C Catholic always means Roman Catholic, while a small c catholic usage can get you into a flame war if you aren't careful.)

The NAE is evangelical in the small e sense - what you would probably consider conservative 'born again' protestant, but there are many small e evangelicals who aren't part of the NAE.

Small e evangelicals would also include conservative members of the mainline protestant denominations who still adhere to traditional Christian beliefs.

Big E evangelicals are generally distinguished from the Reformed (Lutheran and Calvinist) traditions. Generally, they will follow a dispensational 'Left Behind' theology.

I'll use my church as a specific example. The church membership is broadly evangelical. You have to be a professing Christian to join. The officers, on the other hand, have to subscribe to the historical Reformed standards, so I would not classify the church as a big "E" Evangelical body (although it is associated with the NAE.

To try to answer your question more directly, evangelical (small e) can be used to denote any protestant (even high church in its broadest sense), can be used as shorthand for 'conservative protestant' (whatever that may mean), it can mean non- high church protestant, non - mainline protestant, or it can mean non -reformed protestant. With so many possible meanings, I can see why you could be confused.

It can also be used as part of a name of a church body, such as Evangelical Lutheran (a fairly liberal mainline body) or Evangelical Presbyterian (a moderate group that probably wouldn't fall into an Evangelical (big E) grouping.)
58 posted on 11/11/2006 3:01:14 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
If evangelicals left the party, we would win.

Kooks.

McPainintheass, is that you?

59 posted on 11/11/2006 3:08:29 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Thanks for the information, but I am still a little confused. Things are much simpler for us RC's!
60 posted on 11/11/2006 3:16:54 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (I went down in 1964 for Barry Goldwater with all flags flying! This is just a blip!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson