Posted on 04/25/2007 3:41:28 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Now, now, shame on you Liz. You know Rooty said Judi is OFF LIMITS - period, end, stop.
Just because her ex husband (#2) said she was and I quote, "a social climber and a drunk" is no reason to bring Judi into this - even though she'd be the 'first lady' (trollop is more apt) and sit in on Cabinet Meetings.
Okay I'm outta here, have to work now.
ps: (Meow back at ya miss V) (snicker)
So you admit that the temperature has risen, but you do not necessarily agree that it is man made. So you agree with Rudy. :)
If Rudy wasn’t buying the man made line then why did he add the part about dealing with pollution anyway? Rudy supports anything that involves the government taking from the citizens.
Well, gawrsh! Thanks!
No, I'm not. Had you not cut off my excerpt of Rudy's quote, you would have seen the problem with his statement.
"I do believe there’s global warming, yes. ...The big question has always been how much of it is happening because of natural climate changes and how much of it is happening because of human intervention." The debate on the existence of global warming is "is almost unnecessary...because we should be dealing with pollution anyway."
The debate is VERY MUCH necessary! Global warming is not "pollution" and the actions to regulate pollution are not the same as those for global warming. Global warming regulation is an effort to weaken the United States economy with unnecessary regulation, promoted by the UN and others. And the so-called "market based" approach of curbing global warming by implementation of a cap-and-trade program is nothing more than a global scam that abets those efforts and redistributing wealth in the process.
Please don't base your knowledge on Hugh Hewitt. There are many reputable sources of information available. Here is a good starting point.
Why, to flush out dissenters. Naturally.
(Good post, by the way)
I have been reading the conversation, you started this whole thing by wanting to know what gun laws would be acceptable and what the ramifications would be regarding them. There is one and only gun law, it is the 2ND AMENDMENT, to prohit or restrict is in direct violation of the constitution. You cannot pick and choose what rights are to be allowed based population density.
“Third party,” “Write-in,” “Stay home” and “Leave blank” are the spoil sports who take the ball and go home.
The Third Party Perot vote gave the Presidency to Clinton in 1992, but I’m sure all those who voted for Perot were proud of themselves — they were able to get rid of GHW Bush.
Ridding the White House of GHW was a worthy cause. In the case of both parties running a liberal candidate, conservative voters should support the conservative candidate even if they have to write one in.
Sorry, but Rudy does buy into the notion that the bulk of global warming is human-caused. And he's praised Ahnold's "progressive" approach to the problem.
I agree 100%. I see nothing in your quote from Rudy that leads me to believe he thinks otherwise.
...and one who sows discord among brothers.”
Looking at your posts on this thread, it's clear that you are violating one of the seven sins that is listed in the scriptures. Your disrespectful comments to JR are unChristlike, and yet, you tell everyone else here how “ungodly” they are. FR mission statement is listed on the home page, and yet you come here to challenge the very thing this forum stands for. Breaking the rules of this forum isn’t so Christlike—is it? Here’s another scripture for you to ponder...
“Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but don’t consider the beam that is in your own eye?” Matthew 7:3
Other men in her life have said quite the opposite about her.
You choose to believe the one that feeds your obsession.
I love it. The Rudy boosters and the GOP leadership are being told loud and clear that their guy would split the GOP. It's not like conservatives are demanding someone hard right - support on FR for GOP centrist Fred Thompson is overwhleming.
But if the Rudy boosters insist on pushing their liberal for the nomination and he somehow wins, THEY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE for the party split that will ensue. Reagan showed the GOP how to win. The Rudy camp, in their hubris, thinks they can disregard that lesson.
Good point, Condor----maybe Ruti could up his negatives by telling Barbara Walters he'll make Juti US Secy of Global Warming----and that /RutiJuti will command all American's carbon footprints be placed in FBI files.
It was not Hugh commenting. It was a guest on his show who is an expert in the science of weather.
Course, I like your latest, too.
You might be right.
It might be time for the Reoublican party to go to war with itself.
Maybe in the long run it would be a healthy exercise.
Maybe the GOP should ID itself and consider a split into right-center-left?
Maybe.
We see what the far left is doing to the democrats right now.
Do we want to follow their lead - and be guided by the far-right?
Maybe - maybe not.
You might be right.
You’re not LOL-ing as much as usual today. :)
I agree 100%. I see nothing in your quote from Rudy that leads me to believe he thinks otherwise.
Did ya miss the part in bold? He's already rolled over!!!
The debate on the existence of global warming is "is almost unnecessary...because we should be dealing with pollution anyway."
Shucks! It just comes naturally!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.