Contact Info for Senators Likely to Flip Their Vote on the Immigration Bill

Michelle Malkin posted a list of Senators targetted by Kennedy-McCain to flip their vote for the immigration bill. Now its being submitted again so please contact them.

The ones with asterisks are coming up for re-election so let them hear it.

Sorry for the lousy formatting.

1 posted on 06/15/2007 2:04:58 AM PDT by opticoax

To: opticoax; Salvation

Gordon Smith was on the Lars Larson show and called it amnesty. Indicated he didn’t support it...

Call him anyway...

2 posted on 06/15/2007 2:08:57 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

Contact Info for Senators Likely to Flip Their Vote on
setting precedent for all unlawful to become legal.

Yep, anyone who breaks a law will expect because illegal
immigrants get away with it, they can too,
crime rates will increase under ‘immigration bill’ logic.

3 posted on 06/15/2007 2:32:46 AM PDT by Son House ( Democrats are Hostile to Tax Payers.)

Just say NO to Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

4 posted on 06/15/2007 2:54:03 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)

To: 2ndDivisionVet

First, thank you for your persistent posts, a terrific service for each of us who cares deeply about our country compared to the unpatriotiotic and unlawful will of many of our senators!

I finally broke through the word game some senators are playing, especially Kay Hutchison (my senator). For weeks, her administrative assistants have been saying "she is against amnesty." Good.
But, wait. When I pushed back firmly yesterday to ask whether the so-called "touch-back" meant the bill didn't offer amnesty, the assistant agreed that returning to one's home country first meant S1348 was NOT amnesty and that would be the reason KBH could vote for it!!! Can you believe this?

Sen. Cornyn is another two-faced politician (sorry for the redundancy). He didn't support Vitter but did vote 'no' to cloture in the end. He is likely to carry the co-presidente de Mexico with him till the end.

Regards . . . Penny

5 posted on 06/15/2007 3:19:28 AM PDT by Penny

McConnel’s fax machine must be on fire . Everytime I try to get through it is busy .

6 posted on 06/15/2007 3:57:19 AM PDT by Renegade

Michelle wiped the floor with Geraldo last night on this subject on O’Reilly’s show.....

7 posted on 06/15/2007 5:25:25 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Just the facts ma'am)

Calling Senators is all well and good, and I have been doing it regularly, but I don't believe they think there will be any real consequences for them personally if they vote for amnesty. And they are right in that there is nothing citizens can do right now to exact any cost for their votes. I think it is time to up the ante and make a credible threat of immediate impeachment of President Bush on this issue. Millions of people calling their Congressional representatives and demanding that impeachment charges be brought against Bush for his failure to uphold his oath in enforcing our democratically enacted laws and for his usurpation of the legislative authority of the people will get the attention of the Senate and of the President.

Bush's acts exhibit extreme disdain and contempt for the legislative authority of the people on illegal immigration and he has substituted his own arbitrary and capricious whim for the rule of law as determined by the people through their elected representatives. He has implemented his personal open borders policy in defiance of our laws and against the will of the overwhelming majority of citizens. In doing this for the past 7 years he has rejected the basis of our constitution and our republican form of government -- the sovereignty of the people. He does not believe that "the people" have a say in this illegal immigration matter. He simply does not believe in our system of republican self-government.

All legislative authority in our republican form of government rests with the people which we exercise through our elected representatives. The House of Representatives is the guardian of our sovereignty and the constitutional remedy for a chief executive who arrogantly abuses the trust of the people by disregarding their laws is impeachment. The founders gave us this remedy of impeachment to provide a method short of revolution for the people to rise up and throw off the rule of a chief executive who subverts our system of republican self-government.

I spent considerable time explaining to a Congressional aide why it is the duty of the House to defend the legislative authority of the people against usurpation by President Bush. These are the most serious charges that can be brought because if a President can substitute his personal whim for the people's laws then we no longer have a republican form of government as guaranteed by the constitution. It is that simple. If we want to preserve self-government and the legislative authority of the people for ourselves and our descendants then we must impeach a President who so clearly and demonstrably refuses to be restrained from defying the people's laws and substituting his personal rule for will of the people.

8 posted on 06/15/2007 5:43:24 AM PDT by politeia

Start calling your HOUSE members too....
..must be proactive!

9 posted on 06/15/2007 5:45:59 AM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)

To: DelphiUser; the lone highschooler; liberty4us2; Cal_Locke; glad2b_mormon; Ethel; glock rocks; ...

Utah PING!

Hatch and Bennett are on the list. Now would be a good time to call. Ask them to oppose the bill AND vote no on cloture.

Why both? Take a look at this: The Inside Story On What's Happening With The Senate Immigration Bill

Called Hatch and Bennett's offices. I will call again. If you have already called them, call again.

10 posted on 06/15/2007 11:17:30 AM PDT by batter ("Always take the offensive...Never Dig in." - Gen Patton)

You bet I’ll call again. I’m on these guys like ugly on an ape.

11 posted on 06/15/2007 1:06:55 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Bad spellers of the world untie!!)

Hatch is the one who really scares me. He’s been slumming with the likes of Kennedy and McCain.

12 posted on 06/15/2007 1:08:29 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Bad spellers of the world untie!!)

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Hatch is also behind the whole DREAM Act thing (you probably already know that already). Bennett is also one to watch

Sen. Bennett sides with Bush on immigration reform - our good Senator may want to bamboozle his constituents (it will be interesting to see if he is one of those voting for cloture but against the bill - as described in the link on post#10).

13 posted on 06/15/2007 1:34:27 PM PDT by batter ("Always take the offensive...Never Dig in." - Gen Patton)

Got numbers, will call, thanks!

14 posted on 06/15/2007 8:21:50 PM PDT by whenigettime (What part of NO do you (gov't) not understand?????)

Cornyn isn’t going to switch sides.

15 posted on 06/15/2007 10:25:40 PM PDT by PAR35

I know you got the list from Michelle Malkin's site but Ted Stevens is also up for reelection next year (the asterisks).

I've contacted both his office and Lisa Murkowski's about this issue.

16 posted on 06/16/2007 2:21:19 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY

Thanks for posting that. Don’t worry about the formatting.

17 posted on 06/18/2007 8:50:54 AM PDT by presence of mind

To: Penny; PhiKapMom; eeevil conservative; Ladycalif; calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; Cacique; PhilDragoo; ...

I finally broke through the word game some senators are playing, especially Kay Hutchison (my senator). For weeks, her administrative assistants have been saying "she is against amnesty." Good.

But, wait. When I pushed back firmly yesterday to ask whether the so-called "touch-back" meant the bill didn't offer amnesty, the assistant agreed that returning to one's home country first meant S1348 was NOT amnesty and that would be the reason KBH could vote for it!!! Can you believe this?

It may be argued that the 'touch-back' provision may be 'satisfied' with a visit to a foreign embassy located WITHIN the continental USA. Such embassy premises are considered FOREIGN SOIL.

In other words, not even a real touch-back at all. STOP THIS ZOMBIE SHILL BILL NOW!

18 posted on 06/22/2007 5:58:36 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Thanks for the ping!

How about satisfying touchback by sleeping in a box with soil from your homeland? Speaking of zombies et al.

This has to be stopped (again)!

19 posted on 06/22/2007 6:02:34 AM PDT by DBrow

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

thanks!

Would like your assessment on this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1854459/posts?page=26#26

20 posted on 06/22/2007 6:13:28 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Fred Thompson - Endorsed by George P. Bush. Is he the OBL Candidate? Connect the dots folks !)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794