And then there's the Clinton Cackle:
Can you imagine having to listen to President Hillary for the next 8 years?
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Posted on 10/20/2007 11:22:06 AM PDT by keepitreal
While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their party’s presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.
The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton – 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 18–29 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.
(Excerpt) Read more at zogby.com ...
Exactly . She needs to pick off a Red state somewhere . I look for her to put a Red stater on the ticket , perhaps from Virginia or Ohio .
Especially that stump speech where she tells everyone they’re fat!
WASHINGTON - Hey, Tubby, step away from the Big Mac!
That would be the message from a President Hillary Clinton, who suggested Thursday that Americans are roaming eating machines whose belt-busting habits are adding to the country’s health woes.
“People now eat all day long,” said Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.), comparing habits now to her childhood. “We had three meals a day. [Now] people walk down the street, they eat in their cars - they eat everywhere.”
I will point it out again. The men that are left in the US need to rally on this one.
Do not try to beat this woman by giving up all you believe in and accept a liberal male.
Stand up and fight her by standing for family and the security of the US, otherwise you will lose to a nanny state liberal whether there is a D or an R before their name.
And then there's the Clinton Cackle:
Can you imagine having to listen to President Hillary for the next 8 years?
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
We did get luck with Reagan in 1980 though. Who was it John Anderson, a liberal republican that ran for president that year? I though he got 10% of the vote and Reagan still beat Carter by 10 points.
As for Gore I don’t think he’ll run either. If Nader ran and got 2 0r 3% of the vote that would be something at least. And He might if the anti-war left loses faith in Hillary.
This is why she must “Perot” the election.
Clinton can still get elected. Obviously, this poll did NOT sample dead voters - they don't answer the phone, and they don't respond much to surveys. But they do vote, and will vote in large turnouts for Hillary!.
I thought for a minute that I was reading The Onion. I haven't laughed so loud at a line in a serious news report in a long time.
I think this explains why the liberal media have been covering Hillary's financial scandals so much. They don't think she can win in the general election. But if she does get nominated, they will surely clam up.
Not when self-important idiots like Dobson talk about backing a 3rd Party candidate. Combine that with the sanctimonious single-issue voter getting ready to “send another message” and you get Hitlery the First, Primer of the Peoples Socialist Collective of America.
“People now eat all day long,” said Sen. Clinton (D-N.Y.), comparing habits now to her childhood. “We had three meals a day. [Now] people walk down the street, they eat in their cars - they eat everywhere.”
If she keeps this up, she is going to lose the fat vote.
“Approximately 23 percent of Americans are obese. An additional 36 percent are overweight.”
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB4549/index1.html
Yep, better not alienate 59% of the population!
I’ve been trying to stay upbeat, but if she does win, there may never be another conservative in the white house. Everything that goes wrong in her first term will be blamed on Bush, she will start wars for political purposes, so she’ll most likely be re-elected. By 2016 the 20 million illegals, millions of convicted felons, will be given the right to vote. So I don’t see how having her in the white house is a positive for the conservative cause.
If every single person who voted for John Anderson in 1980 had instead voted for “the incumbent” (not likely), Ronald Reagan would still have won both the popular and electoral vote.
That is why we need to not vote for any 3rd party candidate, not matter what. If a third party does start to promote a conservative Christian, be warned, the Reform Party was ran by liberal homosexuals from San Fransico, though many thought it was just about Perot, it was a big front. It was Clinton’s people all along, and I suspect that it will be Clinton’s people again should a “Christian Conservative” decide to run on a third party ticket.
Her national negatives have always been above 50%. Her fellow RATS are in fear of their lives if they mention it.
“All the more reason why the GOP must not choose Rudy Guliani, and instead opt for Romney, Thompson ... or ?”
I agree with you, we could be being fooled into picking Rudy because the Clinton people know that this will cause a back-lash. So people need to be smart and refuse to vote for Rudy at all, even though he has some good qualities, it’s not enough to be elected President as a Republcian, we can’t have a pro-abortion candidate, no matter how good they sound, because it will only cause a 3rd party, despite warnings to Chrisitans, people will not listen. So we must understand that.
They will dig up the votes somewhere.
She did say that “we” will have to take things away from you for the common good.Like your dinner.What next,the Food Police?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.