Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."
Agree.
Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.
‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan
“Permitting democrats to take elected offices will not protect any of the unborn. It can only serve to make things worse.”
Are you asking people for whom abortion is one of the greatest crimes imaginable to hang up their conscience and vote for it anyway? :o
I just don't have a Pro-Choice vote in me.
There is no middle ground on abortion, my friend.
Besides, Rudy gave speeches to NARAL and just this spring supported taxpayer funding of abortions.
Rudy is pro-abortion, even more so than some Democrats. Harry Reid voted for the partial-birth abortion ban bill, for crying out loud. HARRY FRICKING REID
as Rush Limbaugh demonstrated this week, the MSM is no longer required.
over a million views on the Reid Smear Letter.
Anti-gun is anti-life too.
Besides, it is my strong belief that no one of is going to change the abortion culture through legislation. You need to change hearts & educate people. Funding ultrasounds works wonders.
I am more worried about the Bush administration quietly backing Rudy.
Thompson evidently wants to stop illegal immigration, and he is the only candidate close enough to conservatives to get their vote.
Not just Rudy, wagglebee. The Romneybots are in serious denial as well. Oven Mitt was pro-abortion just a few years ago before his magical deathbed conversion.
I know it took a lot for you to type that. I'm very sorry for all of your losses.
Sorry I ain't buying it. Rudy proclaimed that his policies were similar to Clinton's.
Rush is probably correct here.
??? - Ron Paul has always been very pro life in congress.
Ben you and I have had our differences, but Schwarzenegger wasn’t/isn’t one of them. The problem many of us have is that we keep sliding down the slippery sloap while supporting Republican candidates. The party has all but abandoned any pretense of Conservatism. And when these RINOs get into office, they actually implement policy that is diametrically opposed to what we stand for.
I can no longer stand by and watch our Republic go down the drain as people I helped elect do things I abhore.
I must support Jim on this one. I will also state that this isn’t the only issue that will prevent me from voting for a Republican this year. If they are not VERY STRONG against illegal immigration, they’ll be looking for new work in January of 2009. I will not vote to hire them.
Mitt is going to fade quickly I think.
“The recent examples of 2000, 2004 and 2006 should be a major clue. The Presidential elections were close only because a REAGAN conservative wasn’t in the running and the base stayed home. The 2006 election was lost when Republicans didn’t stick to conservative principles, thus losing their base voters. You are so right!”
I told a friend, running in 2006, I was concerned about the party dissing conservatives, and that I thought conservatives were gonna stay home. They did.
I have friends and lots of family members who have lost all trust in the party. I don’t blame them.
The difference is:
I refuse to curl up and let ‘em win. I have never stayed home since Reagan. I have begun to selectively pull the lever, though.
I have never before seen a candidate I believe in as much as this election, and that candidate is:
Duncan Hunter.
I don’t care about naysayers. I care about what is best for this country, and my children. I care that the candidate not only talk the talk, but walk the walk, too.
I want him to live like he knows he is a servant of God- as we all are, whether we acknowledge it or not.
I can wholeheartedly present Duncan Hunter’s message to my family and friends, without qualifications.
I hope I can persuade them to start voting again, but I can’t do that without being able to offer them someone credible, consistent, honest, prolife, and full of INTEGRITY.
I’ve been worried about the Bush administration for a long time!
I don’t know why GOP leaders are attacking their own party. Everyone knows the GOP is the conservative party, and what that means. They spend how many hours analyzing polls and election statistics. Can they figure out that conservatism is what gets Republicans elected, at least in most of this country? It would be a huge self-inflicted wound to nominate a pro-choice candidate. We would then either lose the presidency or shatter the party.
Here's one of my concerns, wagglebee. If Hillary is elected, we can expect vacancies on the Supreme Court to be filled by Ruth Bader Ginsburg types (IIRC Gingsburg was her doing). One or two more Ginsburgs and we'll have a court that will uphold the lower courts when they throw out the laws on partial birth abortion. So PBA will become unstoppable.
I know some freepers believe that Rudy will nominate liberals to the court but I just dont see him nominating the kind of radical feminazi kooks that I am sure we will see under a Hillary administration. And we have to keep in mind that the judges don't go when she does. She would leave her imprint on the Court for decades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.