[ex-snook]

"JR and the others who've been forlornly trying to get to me this morning has been my position that this wretched man is most likely going to be the Republican nominee and as such he's better than the Democrats."

Nah. Pro-life will survive 4 years of Hillary as it did 8 years of Bill but 4 years of pro-abortion RINO-Rudy will spell disaster because neither party will represent the unborn. Hence as JR, et al, have been telling you is that if Rudy is nominated there will be another party and it will be pro-life.

[wagglebee]

Pro-life will survive 4 years of Hillary as it did 8 years of Bill but 4 years of pro-abortion RINO-Rudy will spell disaster because neither party will represent the unborn. Hence as JR, et al, have been telling you is that if Rudy is nominated there will be another party and it will be pro-life.

Perfect!

As long as their is a major party to fight the enemy, we're okay. When both major parties become the enemy, we are in peril.

[Live free or die]

The philosophy will survive any attempt by either party to extinguish it. This is a given. You cannot eradicate helpless babies and not have someone, somewhere nail some 99 Thesis to some doorway.

My point, that you very nearly make for me is that if it can survive 4 years of Hillary, as it did 8 years of Bill, how then could it not survive 4 years of Rudy?

Here's what I think you're position is and correct me if I have it wrong: I think you're afraid that there will be a broad perception that the right in this country has abandoned the unborn. I don't think there's much substance to that apprehension because as was pointed out in an earlier part of this conversation, Rudy is only one man. Naturally he's the president in this dystopian vision, but there isn't much he can or would be willing to do to harm the pro-life position as Clinton did.

Let me know what you think?