1. Hsu talked about "loan" (which is what was a correct structure of the deals), not an "investment" - so no "Ponzi scheme"
2. What Ponzi schemer would go to the trouble of flying to assure his "investors", instead of flying the coup when becoming exposed in newspaper? Means he knew that the money was still coming into the accoounts set up to pay the high-sky "interest" on the loan - that's no Ponzi scheme, that's money-laundering.
1 posted on
11/11/2007 11:24:33 PM PST by
CutePuppy
To: CutePuppy
Money-laundering and the Clintons. As American as apple pie.
2 posted on
11/11/2007 11:25:40 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: CutePuppy
Good to see Wall Street Journal keeping after this story.
4 posted on
11/11/2007 11:33:47 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: CutePuppy
Politics was a world where his schmoozing and fund-raising talents were powerful currency. He became a "bundler," someone who could induce hundreds of acquaintances to donate.
The timing is very important - he became a "bundler" after he got friends in high political places - the $60 million Question is WHO placed and shortly thereafter advanced Norman Hsu on the board of American School?
5 posted on
11/11/2007 11:34:07 PM PST by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: CutePuppy
hmmm... I wonder if Hsu was also involved in counterfeit clothing.
6 posted on
11/11/2007 11:37:10 PM PST by
jer33 3
To: CutePuppy
7 posted on
11/11/2007 11:46:48 PM PST by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: CutePuppy
The curious thing about this article is how it never mentions what an earlier article in the LA Times mentioned: many of the "investors" were persuaded to participate in Hsu's enterprises by all of the endorsements he received from the Witch and others. It also shows an astounding lack of curiosity over the legal redress those "investors" might be able to get by filing securities suits against the Witch and other DemonRats based on the idea that the endorsements provided to Hsu, from which the Witch and other DemonRats massively benefited through contributions, make them liable for negligent or intentional misrepresentations about Hsu that induced the "investors" to participate in his schemes.
To: CutePuppy
Norman Hsu has shown himself to be an opportunist who will do anything to steal from his acquaintences. Now the question still unanswered is whether Hsu will cut a deal with the Feds to implicate the Democrats in return for a lesser sentence.
I hope the recent delays in his prosecution are being caused by the Feds cutting a deal with Hsu to implicate Hillary.
Hsu could have been laundering money obtained from well-heeled Hillary supporters and that would be a much bigger story than Hsu’s ponzi endeavors.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson