Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEDIA FIREWORKS: MCCAIN PLEADS WITH NY TIMES TO SPIKE STORY
The Drudge Report ^ | Thursday, December 20, 2007 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 12/20/2007 7:47:55 AM PST by sitetest

Edited on 12/20/2007 9:24:12 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

MEDIA FIREWORKS: MCCAIN PLEADS WITH NY TIMES TO SPIKE STORY

Thu Dec 20 2007 10:56:57 ET

Just weeks away from a possible surprise victory in the primaries, Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz has been waging a ferocious behind the scenes battle with the NEW YORK TIMES, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, and has hired DC power lawyer Bob Bennett to mount a bold defense against charges of giving special treatment to a lobbyist!

McCain has personally pleaded with NY TIMES editor Bill Keller not to publish the high-impact report involving key telecom legislation before the Senate Commerce Committee, newsroom insiders tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

The paper's Jim Rutenberg has been leading the investigation and is described as beyond frustrated with McCain's aggressive and angry efforts to stop any and all publication.

MORE

The drama involves a woman lobbyist who may have helped to write key telecom legislation.

The woman in question has retained counsel and strongly denies receiving any special treatment from McCain.

Rutenberg, along with reporter David Kirkpatrick, has been developing the story for the last 6 weeks.

Rutenberg had hoped to break the story before the Christmas holiday, sources reveal, but editor Keller expressed serious reservations about jounalism ethics and issuing a damaging story so close to an election.

McCain campaign officials Rick Davis, Charlie Black and Mark Salter are also said to have met with the NEW YORK TIMES in an effort to halt publication.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; corruption; dirty; drudge; election; elections; fredthompson; hillary; huma; mccain; nyt; romney; spiked; whoisleft2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-277 next last
To: sitetest
McCain: The only Republican among the Keating 5

161 posted on 12/20/2007 11:03:45 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; meandog; therut; Laissez-faire capitalist; MARTIAL MONK; napscoordinator; sportutegrl; ..
Details are sketchy on this but I decided to ping everyone just so you are aware.

The McCain List.
162 posted on 12/20/2007 11:05:19 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Um, okay. Except that isn’t really fully ‘established’. Just rumored. Secondly, if you read what Drudge says carefully, you’ll note the apprehension about publishing the story, as well as the curious fact that the lobbyist has also strongly denied any special treatment, which says to me that it’s really related to something else other than influence peddling.

It’s all speculation of course, but so is the stuff about it being Hillary. The two stories do seem to match up to me.


163 posted on 12/20/2007 11:06:19 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

Thank you.


164 posted on 12/20/2007 11:06:57 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

It’s yet to be proven any of those angles are true. I never paid much attention to Drudge but he isn’t raising my opinion of him with these rumor stories.


165 posted on 12/20/2007 11:08:38 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

I think the sort of “special treatment” they’re talking about here is where you get a no-bid contract or a chunk of federal funding without having to leap through the usual hoops.

I just don’t get a “sex scandal” out of what’s been reported.


166 posted on 12/20/2007 11:10:30 AM PST by JennysCool (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: meandog

McCain is a leftist media prostitute. They would LOVE to have him as the Republican candidate.

That way the public can choose between Hillery and Hillery light.


167 posted on 12/20/2007 11:10:52 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yeah.

This story has Mitt’s finger prints all over it.


168 posted on 12/20/2007 11:12:16 AM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

And these guys are civil SERVANTS? Now I can fully understand why these people can’t identify with the average American people.They tell us to conserve energy but what do they do? We have yet to use our heat to save money! No carbon credits so that we can use all the energy we want!


169 posted on 12/20/2007 11:12:55 AM PST by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Dear Norman Bates,

“It’s yet to be proven any of those angles are true.”

That’s true. However, if Mr. McCain has retained the services of Mr. Bennett, then he is taking the story extremely seriously.

I find this bit of double-talk especially amusing:

“McCain acknowledged that his presidential campaign aides have had discussions with the newspaper regarding its inquiries.

“’I have not been in talks with The New York Times. They’ve been communicating with our staff and with us,’ McCain said.”

From: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8TLB7JO1&show_article=1

He acknowledges discussions with the New York Times, but disclaims talks with the New York Times.

That’s not Drudge speaking, that’s a quote from the Senator himself.

ROFLMAO!!!


sitetest

170 posted on 12/20/2007 11:14:22 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Dear JennysCool,

“I just don’t get a 'sex scandal' out of what’s been reported.”

At this point, it’s just speculation. But here’s the hint form Drudge’s report:

“The drama involves a woman lobbyist who may have helped to write key telecom legislation.

“The woman in question has retained counsel and strongly denies receiving any special treatment from McCain.”


sitetest

171 posted on 12/20/2007 11:16:50 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

McCain isdone. Stick a fork in the old coot.


172 posted on 12/20/2007 11:17:16 AM PST by Palladin (Cackle..cackle..cackle. Hillary laid another egg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

The drama involves a woman lobbyist who may have helped to write key telecom legislation.

The woman in question has retained counsel and strongly denies receiving any special treatment from McCain.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


173 posted on 12/20/2007 11:21:40 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Perhaps I have a dirty mind, I guess. When I hear a politician is accused of wrongdoing with a female lobbyist who also denies any ‘special treatment’, the first thing that pops into my mind is some sort of relationship or sex scandal. Also, hiring Clinton’s sex scandal lawyer is another tipoff.

Who knows...not I, but it does kind of seem to fit together to me. The part about them not wanting to report on it really was what brought the whole ‘secret sex scandal’ thing to mind in the first place.


174 posted on 12/20/2007 11:22:47 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

The story I heard was the first wife was in a bad accident coming back from a POW/MIA fund raising event. She had been very active in the POW/MIA movement. When McCain returned home his wife was disabled. Somewhere along the way he met the heiress. Not sure if it was before or after he divorced his first wife.


175 posted on 12/20/2007 11:24:13 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I wonder if this is the “sitting senator” rumor that has been swirling around.


176 posted on 12/20/2007 11:26:22 AM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee is the GOP's Jimmy Carter. Are you ready for Huck the Schmuck to plunder your pocketbook?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
Just weeks away from a possible surprise victory in the primaries....

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

Sure, McLame was on the verge of vaulting over Rudy, Mitt, Fred, and Mike. And monkeys might fly out of my butt.

177 posted on 12/20/2007 11:27:42 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

I went to www.ask.com and put in “mccain wife disabled” and got the following in the first link:

“McCain dumped his first wife after she had been disabled in an auto accident. Although this woman had worked tirelessly to get him released from captivity, he did not hesitate to betray her with other women upon finding her crippled when he returned home.”

I goes on to talk about her family and drug problems. Her family is one of the richest in Arizona. Ol John did alright for himself!


178 posted on 12/20/2007 11:29:33 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Could be.


179 posted on 12/20/2007 11:31:43 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I refer you to my #166.

"Special treatment" doesn't have to be of a sexual nature, you know.

Not saying it isn't, just that it doesn't have to be.

180 posted on 12/20/2007 11:32:10 AM PST by JennysCool (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson