Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP contender will not rule out third-party run [Guess Who?]
cnn.com ^ | 12/23/07 | politicalticker

Posted on 12/23/2007 7:36:15 PM PST by melt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: melt; Captain Kirk

I told you he was going to run 3rd party two months ago. Don’t forget our bet Captain Kirk.

If nothing else it should be entertaining watching GOP statists try to convince the libertarian part of their base to vote for Rudy/Huck aka Baby Killer/Nanny Stater ‘08 and not for the Libertarian candidate.

The same people who laughed at the “leave me, my rights and my money alone” libertarians will be begging and pleading for us to vote for their idiot GOP establishment nominee.


41 posted on 12/23/2007 8:53:47 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Oh good, somebody got a photograph of him in one of his more lucid moments.


42 posted on 12/23/2007 8:53:58 PM PST by Gator113 (My short list..Fred, Hunter, Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

43 posted on 12/23/2007 8:55:04 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

OMG, it’s Stan Laurel! Who is Hardey...Huckabee? LOL!

http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MEPOD/10152669~Comic-Duo-and-Movie-Stars-Stan-Laurel-and-Oliver-Hardy-Posters.jpg


44 posted on 12/23/2007 8:55:56 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

45 posted on 12/23/2007 8:58:23 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
"What type of man then wavers on a promise to his wife of that magnitude?"

Just how fat is she? I've never seen her.

46 posted on 12/23/2007 9:08:55 PM PST by matthew fuller (The destruction of the CIA tapes was indubitably intentional obstruction of treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Defiant; melt

“Shouldn’t this disqualify him from being allowed to appear at the GOP debates? He doesn’t deserve official sanction as a Republican if he is going to run against the party.”

More of Paul’s inconsistencies. If he’d had his way in a resolution he co-sponsored with liberal congressman JESSE JACKSON he would have been kept out of the debates.

. H.CON.RES.263 : Expressing the sense of Congress that any Presidential candidate should be permitted to participate in debates among candidates if at least 5 percent of respondents in national public opinion polls of all eligible voters support the candidate’s election for President or if a majority of respondents in such polls support the candidate’s participation in such debates. Sponsor: Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] (introduced 11/6/2001) Cosponsors (2)

See some of Paul’s CO sponsored legislation here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/1940847/posts?page=28#28


47 posted on 12/23/2007 9:09:16 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All
PAUL IS NOT INTERESTED IN 3RD PARTY RUN (Posted on 11/10/2007 11:55:15 AM CST by Extremely Extreme Extremist)
48 posted on 12/23/2007 9:11:52 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
“Shouldn’t this disqualify him from being allowed to appear at the GOP debates? He doesn’t deserve official sanction as a Republican if he is going to run against the party.”

Since Huckabee is running as a pro life big government Democrat, shouldn't the same rules apply to him?

In all seriousness, taking Paul out of it for a second, I know what you mean. You need a license and test to drive, hunt, fish but any leftist can run with an R next to their name. See Mike Bloomberg. You are right that something needs to be done to protect the brand.

49 posted on 12/23/2007 9:14:34 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: melt

this isn’t fair...if i recall correctly he said he was 99% sure he wouldn’t run as a 3rd party


50 posted on 12/23/2007 9:15:06 PM PST by ChurtleDawg (kill em all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Ron Paul is an anti-Christian bigot and a prick.


51 posted on 12/23/2007 9:15:15 PM PST by BlackjackPershing ("The great object is that every man be armed." Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
Ron Paul proving his word is not worth piddle. He has told us several times he promised his wife he would not run as an independent. What type of man then wavers on a promise to his wife of that magnitude?

Dude, you just said on the other thread that if Ron Paul runs, he'll hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans. So why are you and others getting all bent out of shape over this?

You guys don't want Paul to run as a Republican but you secretly hope he doesn't run 3rd party or independent either. Make up your minds, you're worse than women at a department store, sheesh.

52 posted on 12/23/2007 9:15:19 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackjackPershing
Ron Paul is an anti-Christian bigot and a prick.

Did you know that Paul's 3 brothers are active in the ministry and Paul himself considered going?

Does this sound like an anti-Christian "prick" to you?

STATEMENT OF FAITH BY RON PAUL, 21 JULY 2007

53 posted on 12/23/2007 9:18:18 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: gunservative
Ron Paul appeals to mostly KOOKS from what I’ve seen.

Those "kooks" are the same people who coalesced around Reagan in 1980. People who are hungry for limited government and freedom.

Have all of you guys gone completely bat-s--t insane?

54 posted on 12/23/2007 9:20:47 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Don’t you ever get tired of schilling for this hypocrite. Man you make yourself look like a fool defending this nut.

He cries for term limits and has spent 18 years in Congress.

He whines for less spending and then inserts multi-millions in earmarks while refusing to vote for a bill he knows will pass.

Paul is the biggest hypocrite DC has ever seen.


55 posted on 12/23/2007 9:22:43 PM PST by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

If nothing else it should be entertaining watching GOP statists try to convince the libertarian part of their base to vote for Rudy/Huck aka Baby Killer/Nanny Stater ‘08 and not for the Libertarian candidate.

The same people who laughed at the “leave me, my rights and my money alone” libertarians will be begging and pleading for us to vote for their idiot GOP establishment nominee.

Good point, because in the general election every percentage point of Republican turnout will be essential to victory. Like it or not, whoever is the Republican candidate needs every one of the Republicans and independents who are supporting Ron Paul today to show up and vote Republican in November 2008.

56 posted on 12/23/2007 9:23:32 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

““Shouldn’t this disqualify him from being allowed to appear at the GOP debates? He doesn’t deserve official sanction as a Republican if he is going to run against the party.”

Sorry, that was a quote that I quoted from someone else. I wouldn’t disqualify Paul from the debates, but his own resolution if passed would have. The more he talks the worse off he is.


57 posted on 12/23/2007 9:24:24 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Someone’s working hard to puff up his ego - and at 2% of the Republican vote - it’s NOT us... The MSM seems oddly uninterested in who is giving him the cash...

He is not running as a 3rd party or independent candidate. Both CNN and the Washington ComPost have completely taken his words out of context - AGAIN, and FReepers have knee-jerked and fell for it - AGAIN.

Dr. Paul doesn't believe in absolutes, which is why his real statement was this: "I have no intentions of running 3rd party, I'm 99.9% sure." He told his wife that he wouldn't run 3rd party, for God's sakes.

As far as the money, all of it is from individual donors across the political spectrum.

58 posted on 12/23/2007 9:24:44 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Too many voters and GOP establishment types have decided that Big Gubmint is perfectly OK if it used to accomplish their agenda and keep them in power.

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is. Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals. The strongest man on the block will run the neighborhood. We have government to insure that we don’t each one of us have to carry a club to defend ourselves. But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path".

--Ronald Reagan

Inside Ronald Reagan: A Reason Interview from July 1975

59 posted on 12/23/2007 9:27:26 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson