Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate meets for 9 seconds to block Bush appointment
Associated Press ^ | Dec. 26, 2007 | LAURIE KELLMAN

Posted on 12/26/2007 8:11:08 PM PST by TRY ONE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I for one approve. The less time these rascals are in session the less damage they cause, generally speaking.

I must strongly disagree. The "rascals" are not supposed to be in session. These shenanigans mean their are perpetually in session purposely to cause damage - in this case to prevent the President from his Constitutional right to perform recess appointments.

21 posted on 12/26/2007 9:05:22 PM PST by torchthemummy (“America Will Not Reject Abortion Until America Sees Abortion” -Father Frank Pavone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Since VP Cheney is the President of the Senate, why isn’t he the one handling the gavel? Does he need to be invited? This article leaves much to be desired about explaining anything.


22 posted on 12/26/2007 9:30:53 PM PST by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
So that's why Webb is trying to keep his Senate session brief (9 seconds!). This little trick of the Dems to keep the Senate in "session" while the rest are off on holiday vacations could backfire on them if the GOP unified and played sneaky hardball.

Thanks for the rundown on what would be necessary to counter the Dem perpetual session.

My question is whether the funds paying for the travel of each Senator is being covered by the taxpayer at an extra cost. Obviously they are covered to travel to their respective states during a recess but absent an emergency are they allowed to essentially "charge" their travel costs to and from DC to the taxpayer just to gavel in a session for political obstruction of their choice? Or is the cost supposed to covered by the individual Senator from their own salary or pocket?

23 posted on 12/26/2007 9:33:57 PM PST by torchthemummy (“America Will Not Reject Abortion Until America Sees Abortion” -Father Frank Pavone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Southack

If the GOP unified and played sneaky hardball they would lose their reputation as castrated, spineless politicians, a name they must really love.


24 posted on 12/26/2007 9:36:37 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

how about somebody asking for a quorum call?


25 posted on 12/26/2007 9:38:00 PM PST by patch789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

why didn’t our Pub congress block Clinton?....the stupid party is just that....or maybe they are just more devious in their deceit to the voters ....then again, maybe just b*all-less...


26 posted on 12/26/2007 9:40:36 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

I agree. It’s an abuse of power by the Senate.


27 posted on 12/26/2007 9:41:12 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

chickensheets is right...you called it...


28 posted on 12/26/2007 9:42:08 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

One Republican Senator should show up and ask for a quorum call.


29 posted on 12/26/2007 9:43:25 PM PST by FreedomCalls (Texas: "We close at five.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
It’s a shame we’re not paying them on a piecework basis, however. They’d all starve.

I'd do one of two things:

1. Put them on a reverse commission ... they get paid only out of the money they DON'T spend

or

2. have their salaries and office budget come out of the treasury last if and only if there was actual money in the treasury.

30 posted on 12/26/2007 9:59:43 PM PST by Stegall Tx (...but that's just me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
I wanna know how much this stunt cost the taxpayers for those 11 days. Staff salaries, lights/heat, the whole shooting match.

This is unconstitutional, not to mention just another use of weasel words. The GOP should have been in that session in full force just to highlight the whole farce. Course the GOP ain't that brave.

31 posted on 12/26/2007 10:04:32 PM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Leave it to a child pornographer like Webb.


32 posted on 12/26/2007 10:07:17 PM PST by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

A quorum of Pubbies need to show up, refuse to adjourn, then vote to recess.


33 posted on 12/26/2007 10:14:16 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal/RINO hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Who is more of a budding creep in the Congress than Webb?

Wimp-bloc types that voted for him should be ashamed.


34 posted on 12/26/2007 10:16:02 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Unfortunately, Webb could object to any action. In order to overcome the objection, they would have to file a cloture motion. That requires time to pass, and still would fail because they would need 60 votes.

The only thing the republicans could do would be to take over the senate and talk.

Of course, if Webb disappeared for a second, they could do something, but Webb certainly is prepared to stand their long enough for the Maryland senators to come and relieve him, which would be long enough to fly in some other senators.


35 posted on 12/26/2007 10:43:42 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Southack

great explanation...thanks


36 posted on 12/26/2007 10:55:04 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Southack; Cboldt; ken5050; Congressman Billybob; Mo1
This little trick of the Dems to keep the Senate in "session" while the rest are off on holiday vacations could backfire on them if the GOP unified and played sneaky hardball.

I'd say it's time to turn up the heat in the bullpen, so's we can hold some feet to the fire....regrettably no doubt some are home in their State offices so a call campaign on this issue would likely be ineffective.
37 posted on 12/26/2007 11:07:48 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
Someone on the GOP side needs to get smart enough to block Webb’s car.

Why would they do that? Webb carries a *gun* into the Senate building.

Oh, I'm sorry. I mean Webb's staff gets to carry Webb's gun into the Senate building.

Wonder how that's working out for Webb's fall guy?

38 posted on 12/26/2007 11:14:37 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Pardon my ignorance, but are you saying Webb could object to a quorum call? I thought that any senator could call for a quorum any time they wanted. And that if a quorum cannot be established, that the Senate must be adjourned by pro forma procedure.


39 posted on 12/26/2007 11:27:38 PM PST by DGHoodini (The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Senate meets for 9 seconds to block Bush appointment...

No cajones republicans.....have more than 9 meet for a special session and call for a quarom..if the lib/dems refuse....after a roll call.....seek a ruling by the SCOTUS!!!


40 posted on 12/27/2007 3:35:34 AM PST by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson