“Hillary will be the easiest to beat in the general elections.”
No she won’t.
A lot of women who won’t tell polsters they’ll vote for her will—just because she’s female.
Plus she had the support of socialist party regulars, and she has had that support since 1992.
And a lot of GIRLIE MEN will vote for Hillary and not tell the pollsters either! get ready for President Hillary!
“A lot of women who won’t tell polsters they’ll vote for her will—just because she’s female.”
59% of Nevada’s voters in the DNC caucus were females.
Any surprises that Hillary won?
That said, take a look at the numbers:
Romney: 17,680 (with 41% reporting)
Clinton: 4,958 (with 85% reporting)
Obama: 4,398 (with 85% reporting)
Edwards: 363 (with 85% reporting)
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#NV
Is it just me, or did the Republicans just turn out more voters than the Dems for the first time?
Yes, but that (IMO) would be cancelled out by the men who won’t vote for her just because she’s female. So, taking that out of the equation... see the earlier post about why she’s a good opponent.
You’re pissing into the wind. I’ve been trying to tell everybody here for months the Clintons are our worst nightmare. The lovers of BJ (again, mostly women who would don kneepads for him in an instant)added to the vagina vote will be almost inpossible to overcome. Nobody is willing to factor BJ into things. Think about it. She is the only candidate to ever run for the presidency that can campaign in two places at once.
The only good news is that no matter how powerful the Clintons come to be, they have no clue about economics. Hillary will destroy the economy to an extent that would shock even Jimmy Carter, and no amount of Hillary's fascist oppressive government will be able to bring back.